Quote:
|
Originally Posted by timmgirvan
Just for the record, the posting had nothing to do with any agenda...and Judicial Watch is middle of the road as far as politics,mostly dealing with corruption in Govt. With your permission...Can I still be angry that FDA approved Avandia,the well known Diabetes drug?... which has doctors scrambling to find a safe med for their patients? btw..so much for a meaningful discussion!
|
And for the record, I posted without an agenda as well -- no right/left ideology. I just found it more than a little curious that the way Judicial Watch presented their evidence very much implied that the vaccine was to blame, and in the same article completely failed to mention the other factors that may have contributed. In their defense, at least they have the FDA reports they received so anyone willing to look into it can at least make their own inferences regarding the patients' health without regard to the vaccine.
Their report certainly could lead one to believe that they've got an agenda. If I have a history of heart problems, eat some sushi, and two weeks later drop dead from a heart incident -- would it be responsible for them to write a report saying "Sushi kills Brian W. Spencer," with no mention of the fact that I died from a heart-related incident and that I had a past history of heart problems?
I'm just concerned about the shady way they wrote the report. I am all for the FDA looking into drugs, but if they say they are safe, I will believe they are safe until proven otherwise. Showing that three girls who recieved the shot died without any proof that the shot was to blame and using it as a scare tactic does seem like someone has an agenda on this issue -- and it not you
or me.