Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Riot
The "animal rights" movement in the US is strong and frankly, quite dangerous.
There is a huge difference between the concepts of animal rights and animal welfare. I think it's quite important for people to be quite clear in their minds where they, themselves, stand - and from where authors or speakers are coming from when these topics are discussed.
For example, there is currently a bill in committee in CA that makes it mandatory that any dog or cat living in the state be spayed/neutered. Sounds fairly harmless, no? But the ultimate intent and result of this bill, if it is passed, is the elimination of private ownership of pets in CA. Last year, a bill taking away the right to hunt was narrowly defeated in that state.
PETA has long been recognized by the FBI as a domestic terrorist organization, and The Humane Society of the United States, under president Wayne Parcell, has the publically stated goal of eliminating all private ownership of dogs and cats in the US.
Neither organization, although taking in millions of dollars in donations from well-intentioned folks wanting to "help animals", does anything in the least to help animals. Their intent is quite the opposite.
Horse racing hasn't yet been the focused target of either of these organizations (it's a power/money issue) - but it will be some day.
I urge anyone with a serious or vested interest in animal welfare to be very, very cautious, and very, very well-educated, about what "causes" or "groups" one supports, when it comes to "animal" issues.
|
Hey Riot, apparently we think alike.
I fight the bunny huggers all the time.
And in the UK there are a number of groups that are fighting horseracing.
Did you know PETA had their guy in a bear suit following the Queen around so the bear was at the Derby.
And how bout the polar bear baby deal, they can't even make up their own minds.
We have to fight them. We have several pieces of legislation we are monitoring down here.
Keep fightin them riot, I always am.