Quote:
|
Originally Posted by boldruler
They were always going to do this. It was technically surgery, but it really was replacing screws, which they expected to do. His odds are better than 50-50 now, in fact I was told they are significantly better than 50-50.
...It was technically surgery, but it really was replacing screws, which they expected to do.
|
Where are you getting this info that they were "always going to do this." I would have expected them to say this from the outset, if it had been a routine part of recovery.
They have publicly mentioned plans to change the cast. I don't remember anyone saying "after 2 months we are going to open up the leg and put a couple more screws in".
And "technically surgery"? What's just "technical" about it? They not only replaced screws but they added 2-3 new ones. That sounds like full-blown surgery to me. And it suggests to me that something wasn't lining up the way they'd hoped.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by boldruler
The reason they didn't comment to the drf on the leg's long-term structural viability is the same reason they haven't commented on it from the beginning, because they won't know for months.
|
It would have been an excellent time, however, for the spokesperson to say that the additional surgery was not unexpected.
I hope I'm wrong.
--Dunbar