Quote:
|
Originally Posted by todko
It's not a statistically significant sample. The sample is too small.
Some of those horses could also have won in different years.
I'll take Curlin any day over some of these with the obvious phyical issues and 2 preps at 3.
|
Again, your call! Consider them or not, but being "statistically significant" is pretty much irrelevant in horse racing due to an almost unlimited number of intervening variables (yes, I had graduate level statistics too).