View Single Post
  #104  
Old 04-24-2007, 03:42 PM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunbar
I don't. Is there a rule you have to? ;>)

Do you think using dosage and other breeding info is going to give you more info than those who are close to the 1st time starters have? There's always inside info, but it's most dangerous, and IMO insurmountable, for 1st-time-starters.

--Dunbar
Well... I don't pay attention to dosage for most races, but I do look at the pedigree on first time starters. Let's say there's a Smart Strike or a Lemon Drop Kid on the weeds for the first time... I can promise you that I'll give that horse a second look based upon their 'turfy' pedigree. Sorry, but I find the whole pedigree angle fascinating. I agree that once a horse has had a few starts, you can't really base anything on their pedigrees, but how many of these horses have run 10 panels in a race before the Kentucky Derby? You don't think their pedigree has ANY bearing at all on how far they can go? I do.
Reply With Quote