Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Grits
1.) Ok, so what you are saying here is it is alright to have threads here on every subject that YOU are interested in that pertains to horseracing.
So, I guess I understand this one.
2.) And as far as Perfect Drift's following, or those that care about him and other older runners never betting--I'm pretty sure I put a good deal more through the windows in the last 3 days than he did.
3.) Get it right, when discussing me. I said, "I find no honor in speaking of the horse in a negative manner."
I called no one anything, and that includes "dishonorable."
4.) And don't ever suggest a thing wrong with my imagination again--not in figment, fantasy or otherwise.
5.) If anything does exist here it is the propensity for the immature 20 something to come out swinging everytime their mouth engages a tick faster than their know-it-all brain.
|
This was so rich I don't even know where to start.
1.) I don't care who starts threads about what. This was news, and PDrift said that the thread was started to point out that he ran second again and that he runs second often, which was "obvious" to any racing fan. So was the fact that Curlin won the Arkansas Derby. So was the fact that Dominican won the Blue Grass. Therefore, starting a thread about Drift finishing second was no different at all.
2.) Not really sure that was ever the crux of the issue. It was mentioned, that he's a money burner, but never the crux of the issue. But you get your thing on and pretend that it was.
3.) Of course you didn't call anyone anything. The implication was plenty clear. "I find no honor in...." carries plenty of implications. If I say "I find no class in using an acronym as a message board name," that implies there is a lack of class in calling yourself Grits. Lack of class = classless. I find no class in having a first name that has two names in it. You = lack of class. Lack of class = classless. Of course I don't believe either of those, but please spare me the oh so wise, older than me implication that I somehow took some gratuitous semantic leap on that one.
4.) You made up the negativity in the thread. It was all in your head. Oops I may have just broken your new rule.
5.) Funny. All this time I thought it was people trolling around here that was obvious. You win.
Nothing personal, of course. But it appears you're edging off your rocker on this one.