Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moodwalker
Haha, I assure you that calling me ignorant for asking how you were "sure" that there was more to this story is an improper response.
Just because you feel that you are so "in the know" about the world of law-enforcement, doesn't mean that you know any more about this particular situation than was included in the media releases.
You made this statement. "There is a lot more to this story than the media released."
My question was, "How in the hell do you know that there is more to this story? Were you there?"
Your response is that I am ignorant?
You obviously weren't there, and your assumption that the security was obviously in the wrong is due to your biased view and not to the facts of what happened on that day.
If it comes out that the security guards were totally in the wrong, etc... Then so be it.
But you can't make a blanket statement that you are "sure" of something just because you had some bad experience with law-enforcement. If you are the same person that made all of the posts about the car-ramming incident at the other board, then it all makes sense now.
Those posts about the car-ramming were whining in its highest form.
|
I did not say that the security guards were definitely in the wrong. I just say that they too MAY have been in the wrong. There is a big difference. Go back and read my posts more carefully. We will never know because none of us were actually there and the media quite often gets these things wrong.