Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
What does " deeper " mean?
The simple fact is the race was barely faster than a NW1X that was won by one horse with real trouble and the second finisher moved VERY prematurely. I don't care what the names of the competitors are. I care how the race was run....and that was slowly and unimpressively.
If you analyze races before they are run, which is what someone who thinks a race is a good one because of the names of the contestants does, you will get yourself in a lot of trouble in the future.
Sorry, but the vast majority of races that result in blanket finishes are suspect. It is very rare that a bunch of horses ran particularly well.
|
That was blazing fast. 1:09 4/5 at 6f, after a very fast first 4... and it got hotter than hell later at the track. That was a great show by at the very least 4 horses. People think Nobiz looks bad, I thought it was a very gutsy performance that showed the amazing ability of this horse. He stopped and started 3 diff. times. Adore the Gold put a tough effort in. And the leader until the finish, pure guts. The track changed drastically. Why not compare this to Corinthians run then if you wanna use times, it was hot by then also... This was a good race. The best prep so far.