Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
My favorite kind of poster....somebody who alters other's comments and then twists their response to suit their own desperate needs.
Here is what YOU said...
" He ran the race up front, unlike his other races, and finished going away easily "
I somehow don't think pointing out that he was closer in his previous effort, especially as that was far and away his best effort, was particularly unreasonable.
Once again, however, I gave my opinion of his performance today. Just because you have some need to attack me doesn't mean I need to further my comments to suit your needs. If you don't like my opinions feel free to put me on ignore. I happen to find it curious that in spite of the fact that others said similar things to me it was me that you chose to call out.
|
Okay I attacked you viciously like a pit bull. I apologize.
I dont think this horse has the kind of early speed to run up front, therefore I will again say I think his effort at Keeneland would be more the type of race he would run against solid derby contenders, but not necessarily that wide.
Now, what would have impressed you in an early prep race at Tampa against a weak field with the idea that you might want the horse to run in a big race in May? Just curious.