[pmayjr]

Rudy or Mccain seem to be the most bi-partisan. I mean I think they're both so centralized, that they could get a lot done, and resolve party politics. It's a lot of ambitious thinking I know, but if anyone could do it, it's those 2. So Rudy seems like a great choise. Obama should wait 4 years and try again then.

Oh! 1 big thing about Giuliani- I think he'd try to take the high road, and not bach Bush to terribly about this, but! As far as the Hurrican Katrina debacle goes (and Bush's as well as FEMA's inactivity regarding said disaster), Giuliani has experience responding and handling diasters.

He can say "look at what I did after 9-11. I was active in doing everything I could in to get the problem resolved as quickly as possible". Yes the infrastructure was there in getting help to the WTC quickly. But Giuliani worked endlessly during this disaster. It's an angle that he can use over any other candidate.

Think about this too- If you're a candidate, or a poster on this message bored (not named Cajungator... no... not her lol jk), do you dare say "that's apples and oranges"? Because even if it is, it shows insensitivity to the 9/11 situation as a whole. Political opponents would eat that up and use it again and again against any opponent who would say "that's apples and oranges".