Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Danzig188
several thoughts have occurred to me..
for one, apparently dutrow wasn't aware, or didn't care, that they could subpoena the records-else why chance it? or did the subsequent interview have something to do with them investigating further? how long have they had the power to do so much checking? is a newer rule in place that allowed them to go back and investigate? i'm asking those last couple since it's been over a year since the original suspension.
also, is this a good example of dutrows mindset? breaking rules, scoffing at them, etc...
also, should they have re-instated the original suspension, since he didn't follow the rules of that suspension?
|
Not that I would want to learn first hand, but I would think that every suspension has its own terms and conditions. I say this because I and others have seen different. A trainer here posted the language from his suspension and it said nothing about contact, billing, phone calls, etc. Maybe this is the case for all suspensions and it goes unsaid or maybe its the case for second, third, etc. offenses -- I don't know.
Eric