Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Downthestretch55
Somerfrost,
This has been a "polite thread", and I like it that way.
You are certainly entitled to your opinions, as are others, as am I.
Just a couple of questions...
1) Does it cost any more money to keep one's mouth shut rather than have lies come out of it to support a "war of choice"? (Condi)
2) Although Hillary certainly has a war chest that dwarfs her opponents, her positions have always been "hedged". Do you think she needs to do a bit more to gain the confidence of those that she seeks support from?
At this point, I don't support either of your choices.
|
I'm really not sure about what you are saying/asking? My answer was "political". Cost money? What does that mean? And before you call someone a liar because you disagree with their point of view...I think you may need a little more insight on how change occurs, how politics work and the relationship of power to advocacy! Not my job to educate you and I'm not getting into an endless debate that goes nowhere because you are locked into your mindset of "Bush-loathing"...my last comment to you about Condy is that when you call her (or any figure) names, you are simply discrediting your own position. There is always the "big picture" to assess and a myopic point of view like you constantly display here is not conducive to seeing past your hate. If I viewed politics like you seem to...I'd vote for nothing but conservatives due to my anti-abortion views and nothing but radical leftists due to my social views...in other words, I could never vote for anyone! Regarding Hillary...this is why we have campaigns...so that candidates have time to present their views, be questioned about them and otherwise give us insight...the process is just beginning, when it's over then each of us can decide whether Hillary and others have defined themselves...at this point your criticism is premature!