Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Secretariat
i don't feel like i am backed into a corner.
and what would a day be without the keyboard coward of all time adding to the hysteria of displacing my credibility. sure my credibility is lacking here.
and only here.....
and that is due to oracle spending most of the last two years actively detroying my credibility,
because of his feeling threatened by someone whom he knows is threatening.
and why does a guy who picks as many losers as winners get the positive reaction he does ? because he actively markets his wins and glosses over his defeats, like singling Oonagh Mccool this past saturday, nice choice.
destroying someones credibility such as he has done to me, in the real world,would have landed him in civil court for sure especially if it had a direct effect on my profession.
but lucky for him he hasn't effected my professional credibility or he would need a lawyer believe me.
as far as the sheets go,
was it Deputy glitters they said to single in the
Belmont with three other under and pick him as a place under those three others.
the sheets are not gospel, just someones interprtation of how a race was run.
the drf imo, has more info on them and are easier to read. from waht i can see a 100 on the drf is equal to a 1 or 2 on the sheets. there is nothing magical about them.
and as far as the name calling, i seem to be the onlt one here who is not protected by the moderator.
i could stoop to your level and call you names, in response to yours, which i predicted would be forthcoming a few posts earlier, but i don't feel i need to.
you have your opinion of a frankle horse, i feel was doped before the bcc, and i have mine.
|
I never singled Oonagh McCool anywhere. I haven't called you names. You just accused Frankel of doping the horse in those exact words. I would suggest that Steve would much rather have unpleasantries exchanged then to have someone accusing a horse like Ghostzapper of being doped with absolutely no foundation or proof whatsoever on which to base the accusation.
You would never be teh object of ridicule if you only learned to do one thing, listen and assimilate. YOu obviously don't know a lot about the game but are attempting to learn. learning takes place when you listen to people who know more than you do about a particular subject and pay attention and think about it.
What credentials do you have in your long and illustrious career to dteremine which horses were and were not doped? You have accused many trainers of doing this, yet you offer no information or reasons to back this up.
The sheets DO NOT give picks. If you are referring to the Tg site then that is Jerry;s opinion. The sheets are like anything else, give them tyo 10 different people and they may darw ten different conclusions. They also arent the only thing to look at when attempting to figure out a race. There are about a million factors you can consider. Some more valid and important than others.
Paul, simply learn when to back off after you have made an errant statement rather than further looking stupid with continued baseless accusations.