View Single Post
  #58  
Old 01-26-2007, 01:50 PM
FairPlay
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
When you make a post like this.....



You join the list of posters that skew people's words to fit their own agendas. I never said Afleet Alex " sucked ", nor did I imply it, but to further your agenda you suggested I did.

You have furthered your postition of poster to be ignored with your continued smart azz responses like the most recent one. For a poster with only a handful of posts you have hardly left anyone wanting more.

The sandbox is full of your ilk....and nobody is playing with you there either.
If you're paranoid and read meanings into my posts, then the issue is with you, not with me. I am the only person who raised the "suck" word to make a sarcastic point about Alex's peformance on the track. Because you associate that phrase with your assessment of Alex's career is your problem and probably a function of your own egocentricity.

And to answer your questions: The Kentucky Derby and BC Juvenile should not be the biggest indicators of a horse's career performance. In my view those are indicators that are easily rebutted. Would any one here take Wilko and Giacomo over Afleet Alex as racehorses during the course of their racing careers? Cigar and John Henry never raced in a juvenile race of meaning or the Triple Crown and yet they're great horses. Holy Bull flopped in the Derby and he was a great horse. People here have short memories about the impact of both Smarty Jones and Afleet Alex: Smarty Jones was the first horse to make the cover of Sports Illustrated in a generation and Alex was a serious candidate for SI's Sportsman of the Year Award. So I will end sarcastically: "Yeah, they were real overrated." And look who's casting stones about twisting their words: He who says "Not so aFleet Alex." What a bunch of b.s you're cultivating.
Reply With Quote