Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
You can't tame these savages.We should be spending this money on security measures that will keep them out of our country(not worrying about whether they are gunna kill each other.)Believe me,the Dems couldn't have won that election by themselves.This idiot piss'n away 3000 American lives in Iraq is what cost him both houses of Congress.Twenty thousand more troops going in there would do nothing good,and it would simply be a slap in the face of the American People (who voted to do the exact opposite.) The guy even lost f'n Montana.Is the guy just too damn slow to realize why that took place?
|
I thought the reason Bush took the fight to Iraq was so it wouldn't come here? Isn't that what he's been selling, 'scuse me, telling us the past 4 years?
Scuds, the only thing consistent about Bush is his refusal to take advice that contradicts what he thinks God is telling him to do. Don't count on him caring one way or another what the American people want. He answers to a "higher father," after all. And the 2004 election results were his mandate, as far as he's concerned. You or I, I assume, would be less likely to take a 51% victory as a mandate, but hey, what do I know?
Danzig, I hope to be proved wrong, but I think he's going to keep doing what he's been doing and then pass the whole mess off to a successor (who, I fear, will be blamed for "losing the war"). Check out his record in the business world prior to him going into politics.