Quote:
|
Originally Posted by somerfrost
Viet Nam was a bit different...Charlie was never gonna give up or settle for anything other than total victory while the Iraq mess really has no obvious winning faction! Still...he could be right about "sticking" the next administration. China still needs us to build their economic intra-structure so I don't think they are ready yet to play hard ball....plunging the world's economy into chaos isn't helpful to them...just simply too many mouths to feed!
Condy vs Clinton...that would be something!!
|
You could be entirely right, especially your first two sentences.
China holds a very good hand. They know how to play the game.
Do they fold? I don't think so.
What they're holding is too good. Is it a bluff move?
Nope...they're the ones that have been doing the ante.
We'll just have to wait and see how the cards are played.
As regards Condi...yes, maybe the Repubs best shot. looks like she's getting position.
Hillary? I don't think I'd bet her. To much 'splainin' comin'.
Edwards might be a much stronger candidate, especially in key areas.
Should be interesting.