[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

What are you wondering, why the second one paid so much more? The first one had a 1/9 to start off the pic. Which means nearly everyone who played a pic had that horse, and most probably singled. The second horse was second choice, and with the probability that most singled the 1-9, I'm sure there were a ton live to the third leg. The third leg was not an easy, but again, with such a short priced favorite winning the first leg, it's actually not a bad paying pic 3 considering it was basically a double.

The second one started out with a $65 horse which obviously probably knocked a lot of people out of the pics. The horse that one the second leg was a close second choice, but with such a bomb leading off, probably not too many live. And then the last race was a crapshoot.

I think it's a case of probably many people having the first one, and only a few having the second.

I believe I covered that! I don't understand Curts' dilemna.