Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb
Wouldn't it be sadder for the person who "lost" 30,000 emails (that they didn't want the FBI to see) to be commander in chief?
Using alleged incompetence to cover criminal intent, and then trying to get elected for being "only careless" ?  |
ok. on the emails.
there aren't any lost emails. she deleted private emails. were they all private? I don't know. is the fbi satisfied? seems so. and for a gop appointed gop voter head of the fbi who was impeccably qualified and said to be beyond question regarding integrity to say no charges....well, that's that.
so, do I want a commander in chief who says come and spy over a commander in chief who didn't break any laws?
that's a pretty stupid question.
do I want a commander in chief who says he wants our military to break our laws, to violate Geneva conventions we signed? to invite foreign powers to tamper with our elections, our presidential nominees? effing Russia at that?! I mean, seriously?
how in the hell is his comments on this at all akin to her emails? it's not. she broke no laws, no rules. there is NO evidence of any hacking at all. she didn't send classified info to anyone outside the state dept.
and even if she had done something wrong, in no way does that excuse his calls at all. he keeps showing, every day, how little qualified he is to be president.
I can only imagine the howls from you and others had SHE said what trump said about Russia hacking.