Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDog
And with which part is PP most concerned? It's pretty obvious if one follows their lobbying and political efforts.
Do you know how the 3% claim is calculated? It would be interesting if PP released how much revenue it collects for these different services, but it doesn't. Aren't you at all curious? Perhaps it wouldn't matter to you. But don't quote that 3% figure to me because I think it's bogus propaganda.
Yes, my cover is blown. I am anti-abortion. And I am anti-PP because they are pro-abortion. They are so pro-abortion that they do more than any other "provider," and their share of that despicable market grows every year. They provide abortion under the guise of women's health, but every year they do more abortions and less of nearly everything else, while every year they receive more government money. They perform about 20 abortions for every prenatal care visit and about 200 abortions for every adoption referral. PP is in the abortion business, and it's subsidized by tax dollars.
|
I know where this will go because it's a softball question, but you are saying that tax dollars shouldn't subsidize legal medical procedures?