Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb
Just for your own edification: the use of insults does not camoflage your own apparent level of ignorance. Quite the opposite actually.
So according to your model, a president cannot drive prices down, so your problem is with bigrun?
And, sorry to say, there was no true surplus. There was an accounting trick used during the Clinton administration to show a "surplus" for a couple of years if you "don't count" social security - which you kind of have to since it's also in the general fund. And Clinton touted a "peace dividend" which was a nice way of saying cuts in military preparedness. This is now coming home to roost. At all times we had a large debt on the order of trillions so the term "surplus" needs to be qualified in any case.
And your guy Obama is the 18 trillion dollar man. He has taken us to the cliff's edge. And you know where that spending is going - the Democrat bread and butter of social programs. The bottomless pit where we will continue to throw our ever declining dollars into.
Sounds like you are having a bit of an emotional reaction to just how bad your guy has turned out to be. Sorry but even you will have to put up with him for two more years, as will the rest of us. |
My definition of ignorance is someone that looks at an issue and always has a response that is the party line. Unwilling to have an original thought on anything. Lazy thinking.
My problem was with both you parrots. Both parties are equally as bad and at fault. That basically has been my stance all along. Obama's performance at addressing the jobs crisis has been abysmal. For you to say that we would be better off if the Republicans were in charge after they took us to the brink of a depression just boggles my mind. We would be where we are or worse. Just like 8 years from now we will be in the exact position. The problem is with the process. Citizens United cemented any chance that we would get out of this mess regardless of whose colors are flying at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC.