Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Normandy's Return (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53267)

randallscott35 02-23-2014 02:05 PM

Normandy's Return
 
Didn't get a lot of talk yesterday. Realize how fast the track was playing, but man did he ever look sharp yesterday. Hope he has a big year and lives up to the hype finally.

randallscott35 02-23-2014 02:17 PM

no figure for this yet? maybe 107-110 range.

tanner12oz 02-23-2014 02:32 PM

Looked very good...gotta think BC is the goal

randallscott35 02-23-2014 02:36 PM

I always got a miler vibe from him. Even a closer at 7 furlongs. We'll see. Exciting to watch him

RockHardTen1985 02-23-2014 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 966824)
no figure for this yet? maybe 107-110 range.

Seems high considering who ran behind him. My guess is that 103 fits.

Kasept 02-23-2014 04:49 PM

100 Beyer

randallscott35 02-23-2014 05:55 PM

Ok. Track was fast. Didn't think it was that fast.

RockHardTen1985 02-23-2014 06:52 PM

He beat 2 horses off 300 plus day layoffs and 2 horses that just stink. I am looking forward to betting against him next time out, in any spot that he shows up in.

Jay Frederick 02-23-2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 966918)
He beat 2 horses off 300 plus day layoffs and 2 horses that just stink. I am looking forward to betting against him next time out, in any spot that he shows up in.

I know Morgan's Guerilla was one, but who is the other horse that was coming off a 300 plus day layoff?

randallscott35 02-23-2014 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 966918)
He beat 2 horses off 300 plus day layoffs and 2 horses that just stink. I am looking forward to betting against him next time out, in any spot that he shows up in.

No doubt the competition wasn't great. But I don't think his race was a mirage either. Wait till you see where he goes. I'm not sold on routes for him either so you might have the right idea.

RockHardTen1985 02-23-2014 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Frederick (Post 966926)
I know Morgan's Guerilla was one, but who is the other horse that was coming off a 300 plus day layoff?

Maybe it wasnt 300, but Touchofstarquality had not run in a long time.

RockHardTen1985 02-23-2014 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Frederick (Post 966926)
I know Morgan's Guerilla was one, but who is the other horse that was coming off a 300 plus day layoff?

Just looked it up. Touchofstarquality was 231 and Morgan's Guerilla was 504 and Risk Factor was 291. So he beat three horses of very long layoffs and two horses that just suck.

Jay Frederick 02-23-2014 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 966928)
Maybe it wasnt 300, but Touchofstarquality had not run in a long time.

He ran more recently than Normandy Invasion. Normandy Invasion had been off since May. Touchofstarquality ran in July.

RockHardTen1985 02-23-2014 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Frederick (Post 966933)
He ran more recently than Normandy Invasion. Normandy Invasion had been off since May. Touchofstarquality ran in July.

Apples and oranges my friend. The other horse was 291. Touchofstarquality ran in a MSW race, thats it. Normany was a legit Derby horse running in the Wood and Derby.

Jay Frederick 02-23-2014 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 966936)
Apples and oranges my friend. The other horse was 291. Touchofstarquality ran in a MSW race, thats it. Normany was a legit Derby horse running in the Wood and Derby.

Agree that Normandy Invasion had much better form going into the race yesterday.

How is it apples and oranges to bring up that the layoff he had was longer than Touchofstarquality?

RockHardTen1985 02-23-2014 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Frederick (Post 966937)
Agree that Normandy Invasion had much better form going into the race yesterday.

How is it apples and oranges to bring up that the layoff he had was longer than Touchofstarquality?

Because I said 300 day layoff, one of them was 500 plus another was 291.
And thats without even mentioning Touchofstarquality.

Jay Frederick 02-23-2014 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985 (Post 966939)
Because I said 300 day layoff, one of them was 500 plus another was 291.
And thats without even mentioning Touchofstarquality.

Sorry, was just trying to go by the facts.

RockHardTen1985 02-23-2014 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Frederick (Post 966944)
Sorry, was just trying to go by the facts.

Your right. I was wrong about the # of days. I apologize.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.