Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
(Post 834489)
It's a start. Kudos to the States Attorneys General, because it sure wasn't instigated at the federal level. Best part: no legal release from additional claims.
|
Perhaps it wasn't instigated at the Federal level because it would have been hypocritical?
Obama got elected on promises of hope and change, of transparency and look what the country got.
Backroom loans, for hundreds of billions, perhaps trillions, to financial institutions, kept secret from the taxpayer/bondsman because it may have adversely affected the banks/corps being bailed out. Imagine if those same banks kept the taxpayers’ account information a secret from the government.
Now, suddenly late in the fourth quarter we’re going to settle a lawsuit with those same banks? This on the heels of wanting a smaller smarter government complete with plans of consolidation that will save a pittance (one ten thousandth of one percent of the budget ) and not terminate or layoff a single employee, hypocrisy to the core. Just think if we allow him to go through with his plan he’ll save us the equivalent of this years budget over the next 100,000 years. Next he’ll be telling us he’ll pass an insider trading law against congress as soon as congress makes up the law.
The attack on the top 1% as not doing enough is nothing but a smokescreen meant to keep focus off the fact we are spending with total abandonment while holding onto the unfeasible assurances of the top 1% somehow paying for it in the form of future/higher taxes.
To expose the true colors of the scheme one must simply run the numbers. Using 2009 IRS stats, the top 1% (Those making 380K or more) 1.4 million of them, paid $392 Billion in taxes on $1.68 trillion in income for an effective tax rate of 23.27%. Raising that up to Obama’s 30% target would result in $113.4 Billion of added tax revenue, less than 3% of his yearly budget but 378 years worth of a smaller, smarter, consolidated government. .
Obama gave Fannie & Freddie that and more over the last three years. All they need now is more money.
We are leaking far, far more than we are bailing and without plugging the holes we will drown. Raising taxes with no plan much less ability to cut spending is like buying and installing a new power plant on a sinking ship.
Until a plan to balance the budget is in effect and not just promised, raising taxes is the equivalent of burning money. However once a balanced budget plan is in practice with a couple quarters of spending sobriety behind us, taxes should be raised with the stipulation ALL new tax revenue goes to paying down the debt with the Social Security Trust being the first creditor paid.
Should one need further proof, taxing without balancing is doomed, look no further than the State of Illinois who after the largest single income tax rate increase in its history find themselves deeper than ever in debt with $9 billion currently owed and predictions that will balloon to $30 billion in 5 years.
The fact some consider the call for a balanced budget first and the pay down of the debt second as ‘radical conservatism’ illustrates how out of touch with reality they truly are and I suppose why some are happy living and protesting in a public park. The creativity they have shown thru their signs, chants and housing is remarkable. I mean creating the human microphone and voting via hand signals is ‘one small step for man, one giant step for mankind’ kind of stuff.