Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   newt-colonize the moon (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45356)

Danzig 01-26-2012 06:44 AM

newt-colonize the moon
 
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news...colony-by-2020



wtf for? and is he forgetting we no longer have shuttles? that the space station is now dependent on russian rockets? does anyone think this would be a good thing to shoot for?

Coach Pants 01-26-2012 07:01 AM

Just a lunar getaway for the elite. I say why not?:rolleyes:

Riot 01-26-2012 05:13 PM

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...idea-Maybe-not

As Gingrich noted Wednesday, he’s outlined his ideas for space self-government before. As a young member of Congress in 1981, he introduced a bill he now refers to as the Northwest Ordinance for Space, but back then went by the more prosaic name of National Aeronautics and Space Policy Act of 1981.

BuzzFeed has dug up an actual copy of this legislation from the Library of Congress, and it’s pretty interesting.

Much of it consists of an order to NASA to set 30-year goals for everything from a new “operational world information system” (Newt invented the Internet!) to manned Mars and moon missions.

Title IV covers “Government of Space Territories.” It begins in a sweeping manner: all persons residing in any US space community (which could be anywhere from the moon to Jupiter, we guess) “shall be entitled to the protection of the Constitution of the United States.”

The second section of Title IV says that when a US space colony holds 20,000 people, it will be able to hold a convention to establish a constitution and form of self-government for itself. Kind of like Philadelphia in 1787, only with external oxygen supplies.

Title IV’s third section establishes that whenever said space colony holds the same number of people as the least populous US state (right now, that’s Wyoming, at 544,270) it will be admitted as a US state “on an equal footing with the original states.”

hi_im_god 01-26-2012 07:31 PM

he doesn't go far enough.

we should build a time machine on the moon that let's us go back in time to kill hitler.

geeker2 01-26-2012 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 834313)
he doesn't go far enough.

we should build a time machine on the moon that let's us go back in time to kill hitler.

Or maybe Spock's Brain :D

Rudeboyelvis 01-26-2012 08:59 PM

If you're running a campaign in FL...And if you've been to the Space Coast lately (11.1% unemployment), it's what people want to hear....since the pres gutted NASA so he can prop up banks and make believe there isn't a problem by borrowing trillions more to throw into socialist govt sponsored welfare programs because he's proven that makes it all better. Yay!

hi_im_god 01-26-2012 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudeboyelvis (Post 834323)
If you're running a campaign in FL...And if you've been to the Space Coast lately (11.1% unemployment), it's what people want to hear....since the pres gutted NASA so he can prop up banks and make believe there isn't a problem by borrowing trillions more to throw into socialist govt sponsored welfare programs because he's proven that makes it all better. Yay!

kepler, messenger, new horizons, dawn, curiosity.

nasa is continuing the mission of exploration just fine. it's hardly been gutted.

explaining to a small government republican why we shouldn't spend hundreds of billions on manned space flight to find out the answer to the burning question: "why did we spend all that money?" shouldn't be this hard.

orbital sciences, spacex, scaled composites, and other private companies are building the next generation of launch vehicles. they'll launch from virginia, new mexico, and other sites (along with florida).

they'll even provide supplies and manned missions to iss (at a small mark up to cost) so we can continue studying the effects of weightlessness on man. the futuristic equivelant of staring at our own belly buttons.

DaTruth 01-26-2012 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 834328)
explaining to a small government republican why we shouldn't spend hundreds of billions on manned space flight to find out the answer to the burning question: "why did we spend all that money?" shouldn't be this hard.

Since when is Newt Gingrich a small government Republican?

Danzig 01-27-2012 07:26 AM

i don't think any of them are small government. i don't think one of those has existed in years. ever?

Cannon Shell 01-27-2012 11:28 AM

I am completely for a Moon colony. As a matter of fact I know exactly who should be sent there Ralph Kramden style...

bigrun 01-27-2012 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 834425)
I am completely for a Moon colony. As a matter of fact I know exactly who should be sent there Ralph Kramden style...


Bush/Cheney, Newt and.......

Coach Pants 01-27-2012 12:16 PM

All of the central bankers. Aka their bosses.

Clip-Clop 01-30-2012 08:42 AM

Anyone remember the guy from Airplane 2 that was the perv and they were going to the moon to get away from all the people talking...

Danzig 01-30-2012 08:44 AM

i think all of our current pols should be the ones to colonize the moon. take their lobbyists with them. the prez, vice, all of congress...that would be a great way to begin anew in d.c. take the current republican candidates along as well.

Cannon Shell 01-30-2012 03:39 PM

We need to send Al Gore so he can invent the internet up there. No global warming though.

Cannon Shell 01-30-2012 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 835102)
i think all of our current pols should be the ones to colonize the moon. take their lobbyists with them. the prez, vice, all of congress...that would be a great way to begin anew in d.c. take the current republican candidates along as well.

And any citizen cheerleaders as well


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.