Occupy UC Berkeley
 

We'll wait for word on whether she's Ok from Riot. ;)

But what a piece of shiat!

A young 20 something male hitting a young female with an aluminum bottle for saying no? Hopefully karma will leave this idiot, dead in the road, run over by a truck, tonight.

http://www.dailycal.org/2011/11/18/m...students-face/

What in the world does that have to do with Occupy UC Berkeley?

Have another drink :tro:

:zz:

Again - what in the world does that have to do with Occupy Berkely?

Just happens to be Occupy Berkeley is going on in Sproul Plaza. But don't let the facts stand in your way. She probably made the whole story up anyway.

:zz: What facts? This didn't happen at Occupy Berkeley. Why do you think it had anything to do with Occupy Berkeley?

She's a Berkeley student who got smashed in the face, on campus, after telling some ***** idiot she wasn't going to the protest at Sproul Plaza. That protest in Sproul Plaza is also known as Occupy Berkeley. I could make it easier for you but why bother? :zz:

I already know that, Dell. That's why I'm asking - so what the hell does this have to do with any of the protesters? or with the Occupy movement at Berkeley? Why did you entitle this "Occupy UC Berkeley"?

It was a campus attack, Dell. Why are you trying to tie it to Occupy Berkeley? Why don't you tie the arson or the three sexual assaults to "Occupy" while you're at it?

i'm figuring because of what the guy said to the victim? it's a reach, but i'm sure that's why.

Because of the reason she was hit. You know saying she was not going to the protest? :zz:

I suppose if a patron was coming out of a cafe across from Zuccotti Park and was attacked after saying she wasn't going to the protest, you'd call it a cafe attack.

Take the blinks off.

Seriously? Are you that crazy prejudiced? It's Occupy's fault because some nut attacks a woman on campus? Seriously?

BWAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ! Hey, don't forget to tie the campus arson and sexual assaults to "Occupy", too. LOL!

Are you that out of touch with reality? The attack came as a result of an answer she gave responding to whether she was going to the protest. I'm unaware of any arsons or sexual assaults (other than the one in Zuccotti Park) but that was of course settled with screams of pervert. :zz:

You realize you dug another hole and are simply digging further, again?

yeah, but that guy coulda been a loony that would have hit her if she said yes, she was going.

Oh, well those arsons and sexual assaults are listed on the same page as the article you linked. Did you READ the page you linked?

So are you accusing the assaulter of being an Occupy person? Yes or no? How prejudiced are you?

Yes or at least a sympathizer. Only because it occured directly after an answer to whether she was going to the protest.

If that makes me prejudiced in your eyes, so be it.

Gee, you think? :rolleyes:

BTW your compassion for the woman who was attacked comes through loud and clear, once again.

Yup. Pretty damn prejudiced. Zero evidence to link this to Occupy - not even in the police report - yet you've done it :tro:

Of course, you've wished this attacker to be killed. I guess that makes you a hate-filled terrorist, associated with Al Quaeda ?

i think after reading both of the above, i can see why this room is so little visited anymore.

i think both of you are loony.

:tro: