![]() |
Breeders' Cup Turf
This race needs help.
If the Europeans aren't going to support, who will? Our horses? They're being pulled towards shorter distances, which makes for a very light and weak division. Handle is pinched too. The Dirt Mile out-handled the BC Turf by $1.3 million ($9.3 million versus $10.6 million). The Dirt Mile did have a pick three. However, the double pool in the Dirt Mile was small because of it. The double pool in the Turf was huge. If you take-out the multi-race wagers, for the second year in a row the Dirt Mile out-handled the Turf. That said, the Turf has never been particularly strong in the field size department. Since 2000, there have only been four runnings with 10 or more horses. Four races with eight horses, and this year with seven. |
Quote:
|
I thought a few of the horses running in the Red Smith yesterday would have had better chances than our American contingent that actually ran in the BC Turf.
|
They should switch places with the Turf and the Ladies Classic.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Would Paddy O'Prado have made the field a little better? I thought (after entries were drawn) he would have had a better chance of winning the Turf than the Classic.
|
I think they need to seriously consider raising the purse another million.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:rolleyes: |
Maybe they should take away the f an m turf and just make it unrestricted for a bigger purse.
|
Quote:
Me though, I say fugg those Eurotards. If they're dumb enough to not want to take down a huge purse with their second tier horses, let them stay at home. Hell, even their third tier horses would fare well in the Turf. I'm sure some of them will wake up to the easy pickings eventually. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Make the race clock-wise.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.