|  | 
| 
 Secretariat -- the movie I will go see Secretariat when it comes out, and I'm sure I'll enjoy it.  But I was reading this article (link removed, see below) and found the following quote by the screenwriter amusing: “We never got to see him run as a 4- or 5-year-old,” Rich says. “The real age of maturity for a colt is five. I have no doubt he’d have made a run at another Triple Crown.” | 
| 
 The article was in the Portland Tribune, which can be found at portlandtribune.com, if anyone wants to risk it.  I did not get any malware warning from the site (but I'm at work, which has extremely good protection). | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Did a google search for Portland Tribune and below the link it says "this site may harm your computer." Now Nortons gave it a pass. Hmm! But if the screenwriter Mike Rich made the quote, all I got to say is Wow! | 
| 
 Okay.  Per this addendum to the article, turns out that the screenwriter wasn't the cluless one: "Editorial response: That's my mistake. I misquoted Rich. 'There are major stakes races open to four- and five-year-olds,' Rich says. 'Those are the races I'd have liked to have seen Secretariat in. I have no doubt he'd have done pretty well.' Kerry" | 
| 
 Quote: 
 I'm sure that's how it happened. That is a pretty big misquote. Likely he's being paid to have the author save face. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Those quotes, or misquotes, sure do not help my motivation to go see at the IMax. I knew far in advance I would never want to view the Ruffian movie. Secretariat I was up in the air on. I'm not a fan of "reality TV" at all. But I saw Secretariat and Ruffian real time, and the real memories are etched in stone. For better or worse. Real stuff. I'm inclined to pass on "historical dramas." | 
| 
 There was a book on Ruffian that I read back in the late 1990's though that was outstandingly written. I was based in South Carolina at the time, and was enlightened to her South Carolina connections that I had never known before. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Absolutely, that is the book. Here's the book with some samples of the comfortable writing style: http://books.google.com/books?id=MVZ...page&q&f=false | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Sheesh. OK though, you are right. Still a very nice book though. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 My position is: "If it has hooves and runs, I support it." All forms of racing, and any product that either tries to be reverent and/or increases interest. My sister-in-law said she wants to go see it, and she participates in the bets my buddies and I put together for the big race days. Anything that gets us exposure (as long as it doesn't tear us down) is a good thing. For all its faults, it looks like the movie, being a Disney product, will be uplifting for those who see it. That can't be bad for racing. | 
| 
 racing would be better supported if you took your sisinlaw to the track and got her to bet more often.   i won't go see it, but that has more to do with my dislike in general for most movies. i doubt this one is much good-which is a shame, since secretariat was so good. but i saw what they did to the seabiscuit book, can't imagine this would be any better. heck, i'd have rather they made a movie about slew. seabiscuit and this one are about rich folks with a horse. seattle slew was that groups first horse, bought for not a whole lot of money, and look what he did. now that's a tale. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 I agree that whatever they do will fall short of the true story. Secretariat was a horse of truly mythic proportions. He was Pegasus. If they make a Seattle Slew movie, I'm going to that one too. | 
| 
 The quote in the first post is ridiculous, but the DT members who are talkin **** on a actual racing movie that will give racing some national exposure are even more ridiculous. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Quote: 
 I was joking. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.