![]() |
Charitable Man and Convocation
I am getting disappointed with Charitable Man in his last couple of starts and wonder how good he really is. While I think Desormeaux mugged him through-out the middle of the first turn and through the back stretch yesterday, I just wonder how good he is. I wonder what the rest of you folks think.
KD first came inside then pushed out and kept brushing and pushing out charitable man every few strides, checked his horse (convocation) repeatedly as he kept moving into impossible holes just to stay with CM and, of course, cost his own horse any chance in the race. Compromising CM along the way. KD has been riding great but it is these kinds of rides that make it difficult to handicapp a race. In the Belmont, Alan got taught a lesson by Desormeaux. Alan moved when he saw MTB's premature move and flattened out in the stretch in what was a distance he probably was not meant to run. I just don't know what to make of CM at this point. |
I never really thought much of Charitable Man, but I liked Convocation yesterday who ran even worse. Chartiable Man got that dream set up in that funny race (think it was the Dwyer) where Hello Broadway went out in crazy
6F type splits and has been badly overbet in both starts since. I doubt Charitable Man will run in the Travers as word has it the horse has physical issues and is often being seen by the vet. Going to be interesting to see who goes in the Travers. Kensei supposedly has distance limitations but you would never know it from yesterday's race. |
Quote:
|
It's be interesting to get E Donovan's take on this. He'd probably set a new personal record for using 'steadied' and 'uncomfortable' in a sentence. :rolleyes:
What's there to get about this horse? He got a difficult trip (wide and off the pace, when he's typically closer) in a race that didn't come back (went 2-1 around the track.) And, while running significantly more (in terms of pace and distance covered) than his barnmate, Flat Bold, he gamely finished ahead of that one (while dropping Convocation fairly easily). I'd like to see Kensei in a more fairly run race. Of course, next time out, there'll probably be mucho pace and the race will collapse -- and Charitable Man will be sent on a suicide duel. You know how that goes. :rolleyes: P.S. I never really thought much of this horse. |
Quote:
You could send him a message on facebook like I did.:D |
Quote:
I did think that Convocation was rank at the outset but when I looked at the race over and over I realized he really wasn't. Des. just yanked him in and then out and then kept pushing him into a spot that wasn't there, banging into Charitable Man in the process. |
http://nyra.com/Saratoga/Broadcast/Video/Video.shtml
I dont know how anyone who watched that race yesterday could blame the problems of the 7 on the jock. These are animals not machines. Watch the head on replays. The horse is rank and uncomfortable all the way around the back side. The horse broke from the outside and the jock brought him to the rail after the break to save ground. From there the horse gets headstrong and refuses to relax. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Charitable Man was fast last year, but there are numerous horses that have developed more than him. The sheets guys keep trying to give him big figures for going wide again and again, but this horse just doesn't appear to really want to win when he looks competitive animals in the eye. A classic money burner IMO.
|
Quote:
The plan was obviously to close. So, in your perfect ride, you will leave a closer WIDE? The jock did what he was supposed to do. The horse didnt settle. This was a 7-1 shot that has a HISTORY OF BEING A HEADCASE. See only previous two turn start. Then again, its easier to just blame the jockey. |
Quote:
And a jock knows what kind of horse he has at the break. And yes, if you have a rank horse, one of the strategies is to pull him outside, closer or not. What choice does a jock have anyway. If he doesn't get him to settle he has no chance anyway. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As far as Charitable Man, that was his third two turn effort and each one has been poor. Granted, one was the belmont and the other was at keeneland so one can hardly draw any conclusions. He was wide on both turns although i cant see Garcia as having much of a choice either besides maybe being closer to the lead. Everyone sees it differently and I understand that. To me, it just seems that people are often quick to declare jockey error. Myself, I am quick to claim track bias when further inspection proves the track to be fair. Either way, we will certainly see our share of bad rides and biases this meet. Cheers! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.