![]() |
Will it pass?
|
Quote:
|
i thought it was another thread on kidney stones.
|
if it's presented as a way for the govt to end up with more money, yes-it'll pass.
|
No, gambling is evil and must be punished.
|
Anything is better than nothing, but wouldn't a better tax law change be one that looks at amount wagered when calculating whether the bettor received more than 300-1 odds. With such a rule in place, there would be far fewer "signers." The proposed legislation will have no impact on the need to sign for what really are some relatively small payouts.
|
Quote:
now that's funny... :) |
about 4 years too late for me.
I'm battling the IRS on some withholding tickets from 2006-2008 and it's a real pain in my balls. |
Quote:
I hear Giorni Felice has been out working Fed Deposit in the mornings.. |
While this bill certainly isn't a bad thing, there are so many more important things that could be addressed. This bill would help a very small percentage of bettors, and the tracks even more. This bill isn't about the bettor, of that I am sure.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If nothing else it will eliminate needless paperwork like this and the truly unfair methodology which increases your gross income then takes the losses as deductions. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
this is a windfall for 'professional signers' if you know what I mean!
|
|
It sounds to me that you will still owe the taxes at the end of the year? So how does this really change anything? We shouldn't have to "sign" for anything under 10,000, now that, boys and girls, is reform we can believe in.
|
i think ,if i read correctly, is this would only keep you from having the taxes withheld immediately. you'd still have to pony up later. it would change that you would have more money in your pocket while still at the track, so then you could bet more back.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.