![]() |
Friday night HOL 7 DQ
I'm a seriously biased opinion on this one, but there was a DQ of the #4 in the 7th at HOL on Friday night. I can't objectively say it was deserved or not because I had singled the 4 in my P6 and cost me hitting, as I had the five others. Did anyone else who saw it see it as a worthy DQ?
|
Seemed justified to me. Bad idea by Bejarano to pound the horse righty just before it was surging to the lead.
|
Good acting job by Danny with a horse that wasn't going anywhere, if Gomez was on the 4 he would of been left up.
|
Quote:
|
Horrible decision, Sorrenson caused his own bad luck and if anything to me the outside horse caused more the the eventual winner.
|
Bejarano had the better horse. They usually give the top 2 jocks out there more rope than that. Me thinks they were possibly going after the cheater who trains the horse. I don't agree that Sorenson's horse was going nowhere. I just think it wasn't gunna beat Bejarano's. I'm a horizontal player. So, I want the horse who was best to be left up(if it appeared best.) We are talking about 60% of the purse. Should make an effort to give that to the best horse on the day. I can tell Danny's horse was gunna come in behind Bejarano's. That much I know. They usually do judge these things in the way I just described. They change that procedure based on who is involved. They often let Gomez and Bejarano cheat on the 2nd best horse, and leave them up(a lot.) I think this comes down to punishing a cheater trainer.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.