the Ramseys - We salute you
 

In NY we see what you are doing. Thank you for stepping up and being a huge player in horse racing. God Bless.

whew...do you know what you are saying? maybe you should ask a few questions about these people and their practices....

Chuck Simon.. Dale Romans.. Lynn Whiting.. Ronny Werner.. and more. ALL unpaid or strung out to the breaking point, and ultimately short-changed by the embarassing Ken Ramsey.

In the spirit of this thread I would like to take this opportunity to thank Satan for 9/11. We see what you're doing and we likes it!!

Hey bartender let me get 3 shots of Jack and a Tall boy!! WHOOOOOOO!!!

Ginger Punch could pay the bills

I think this is your finest post ever. On a side note, I would not trust Ramsey with 10 cents.

J. Paul Reddam and Kenneth Ramsey have reached a settlement in a lawsuit in which Reddam alleged that Ramsey and his trainer conspired to conceal injuries to a horse that was the subject of a 2005 sale, according to Reddam's attorney.

The settlement was reached on Sunday night, according to Dan Baren, who represents Reddam, one day before a jury trial to hear the lawsuit was scheduled to begin. Baren declined to provide details of the settlement, but said that the horse that was the subject of the lawsuit, Big Picture, is still owned by Reddam.

"It was an amicable settlement," Baren said.

Michael Meuser, the attorney for Ramsey, did not return a phone call on Thursday.

Reddam filed the lawsuit late in 2005, claiming that a horse was administered painkillers before a veterinary examination by Reddam's representative on July 10 of that year. The lawsuit alleged that Reddam's veterinary representative would have detected lameness in the horse if the painkillers had not been administered. Following the inspection, Reddam purchased the horse for $600,000.

The lawsuit was seeking the purchase price plus punitive damages.

Invite him on ATRAB and ask him to address the state of racing and why he has had so many trainers?

He has a billion dollar net worth it isnt about money perhaps he didn't feel he was getting a fair shake from list above? Who knows? You know trainers would never screw an owner so it can't be that right? Ask Mr Gann about his friend Frankel? Who does more screwing trainers to owners or owners to trainers? Doesn't make Ramsey right but you think that list above is beyond reapproach? Save Cannon Ball who obviously is a man of extreme righteousness.

I don't think anyone wants to hear his BS on ATR.

If you don't like the "shake" you are getting from your trainer, change trainers, call the police, sue the trainer, or whatever needs to be done in a legal, civil manner. Keeping your horses with that trainer and not paying the bills is plain wrong.

Apparently MrB wasn't referring to Ramsey's bills....

O, that is Franks baby,

No more or less wrong then not getting what you are charged for.. Imagine a trainer invoicing for BS services? "Did you buy magic beans Jack"?

Wow Dahoss made a mistake alert the media