You should take your own advice.

If you didnt like how I phrased my answer, not my problem.

Right, this is what you do when you're shown up about something. Don't address the issue and tell the other person they have an unrelated mental problem. And you don't see the irony in that. I think you suffer from agoraphobia. Just a wild guess.

I know. It's an internet board with lots of unstable people. Myself included.

Ain't a mental problem. Ya temper is immense. You could pull a house down the street over something stupid like this. I'm in L.A. Don't have a team. Wouldn't you think I'd be objective about this crap? What would I have against (or for) Marino, or Manning? One was good. The other was great. I addressed your statement already. I said Manning had not that great of teams, and isn't the most clutch quarterback in the post.

Must you?

Must I what?

Temper? What are you talking about? I laid out very reasonably why you're wrong about Manning. You have no rebuttal, so your response is to insinuate that there's something wrong with me. You do the same thing when you argue with Andy. Because you're dead wrong about it, it's stupid. You really don't know much about football, but maybe that's just my 'temper' talking.

I gave you a rebuttal. You wrote a book about something that's just not very important. I don't feel like writing all night bout this shyt. If it's really that big a deal to you, I will go through each game (so fkn boring.) You have never been as bad as Andy. That individual will simply lie about people. When caught, he says he wasn't serious. I don't think you do this.

LOL..Cheney

Did it ever occur to you that I've written something similar to combat tards who think that one lucky Super Bowl makes Manning great and not a choker? It took me five minutes and no one ever has any rebuttal for it.

You're perfectly willing to argue minutiae about the Dodgers and politics until your eyes bleed, but when someone takes you to task about something you're ignorant and wrong about, it's "just not very important".

Wasn't important to me (before you ever wrote it.) You can't settle everything. Sometimes people just disagree. If you don't think Manning's great, I'm not pssd about it.

Neither am I. Believe it or not, you can't read everyone's moods and tendencies the way you think you can. The point is, you said Manning's great because he got his ring. He was lucky/terrible in that playoff run. If he's great, it's not because of that ring. End of argument.

I know Colts fans who take Brady 10/10 times over Manning.

doo-dah you!!

Join the crowd.

:zz: