Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Vic Staufer (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=681)

eurobounce 06-12-2006 02:15 PM

Vic Staufer
 
Does anyone else get a kick out of him like I do. This dude was cracking me up over the weekend on TVG. Not too crazy about his picks but he is one funny dude.

Suffolk Shippers 06-12-2006 02:21 PM

I think Vic is a great race caller, only behind John Dooley in my eyes. He is sometimes comical on TVG, but when he hosted 58 flat last week, he fell 58 flat on his face. I dont hold it against him though, not his style.

eurobounce 06-12-2006 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suffolk Shippers
I think Vic is a great race caller, only behind John Dooley in my eyes. He is sometimes comical on TVG, but when he hosted 58 flat last week, he fell 58 flat on his face. I dont hold it against him though, not his style.

Yeah it is hard to compete with Greg Wolf and Matt. Vic did seem to be out of his element on :58 flat. But that man cracks me up.

intense 06-12-2006 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suffolk Shippers
I think Vic is a great race caller, only behind John Dooley in my eyes. He is sometimes comical on TVG, but when he hosted 58 flat last week, he fell 58 flat on his face. I dont hold it against him though, not his style.

I work at AP and Dooley is one hell of a nice guy.

hoovesupsideyourhead 06-12-2006 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suffolk Shippers
I think Vic is a great race caller, only behind John Dooley in my eyes. He is sometimes comical on TVG, but when he hosted 58 flat last week, he fell 58 flat on his face. I dont hold it against him though, not his style.

dooley//argggg//"with a wide and hopefull run"...

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eurobounce
Does anyone else get a kick out of him like I do. This dude was cracking me up over the weekend on TVG. Not too crazy about his picks but he is one funny dude.

I love his dedication to our sport, but I think that he is one of the least talented race callers...my personal opinion....his calls are very average from a technical standpoint, and he offers to much post race analysis after the horses cross the wire....his strong suit is the excitement element he adds to the races - which might be the best in the country outside of Durkin, as far as getting you excited in the finish/stretch run of the race...also, I hate announcers who you can tell have premeditated adjectives in place for certain events that may take place, and Vic is bad about that...it ruins it for me when I hear something that you can tell he thought up the night before, like when Surf Cat won a few weeks ago and he sad "Cowabunga Dude!" at the sixteenth pole...horrible...his stretch call in the Whittingham Saturday was the best I've heard from him in a while because you could tell that he was original in describing Lava Man's performance and it just rolled off the tongue..I really enjoyed that call..he need to replicate those types of performances..

Vic has a good sense of humor and is quick-witted, which is helpful for him when on camera, but other than that he is a fairly bad TV personality/commentator....he is too overly opinionated and is a horrible handicapper - and then makes excuses when he loses most of the time....

Best callers: (IMO)

Technical: Trevor Denman - easily the best at this..he calls moves before they happen...great understanding of horses and jockey body language, pace, class, track-play, etc. from gate to wire...

Excitement Component: Tom Durkin - his voice exudes class and prestige, and his stretch calls are so powerful that they emotionally attach you to the race...(although he is not as good as he used to be IMO)..

Most Underated/Unknown: Frank Mirahmadi - This guy is the most talented race caller IMO...he possesses it all...he uses an intelligent vocabulary to describe what is transpiring on the track without over doing it, and his level of excitement with timely adjectives and a raised tone in the stretch is powerful and compelling...On top of that, he is also a very good technical caller, which is far more important to serious horse players than the average racing fan may think.

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by intense
I work at AP and Dooley is one hell of a nice guy.

I know him well and I second that...class act

Suffolk Shippers 06-12-2006 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
dooley//argggg//"with a wide and hopefull run"...

"Artiside's Angel crosses the line first with ET Baird aboard TO WIIIIIIIIIN the 1pm opener, 4 lengths back to Saratoga Paperclip..."

eurobounce 06-12-2006 03:01 PM

What I enjoy about Durkin is that the pace of his call matches the pace of the race. He will using a low tone when the pace is fast and then his tone gets higher and speech gets faster as the race goes faster and get heated.

Denamn is unreal at spotting a horse that is going to make a move when he actually hasnt made it yet. He is extremely good at that.

I like Vic alot but I can always tell when he has money on a horse in the race he is calling. That drives me crazy.

Suffolk Shippers 06-12-2006 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cunningham Racing
I love his dedication to our sport, but I think that he is one of the least talented race callers...my personal opinion....his calls are very average from a technical standpoint, and he offers to much post race analysis after the horses cross the wire....his strong suit is the excitement element he adds to the races - which might be the best in the country outside of Durkin, as far as getting you excited in the finish/stretch run of the race...also, I hate announcers who you can tell have premeditated adjectives in place for certain events that may take place, and Vic is bad about that...it ruins it for me when I hear something that you can tell he thought up the night before, like when Surf Cat won a few weeks ago and he sad "Cowabunga Dude!" at the sixteenth pole...horrible...his stretch call in the Whittingham Saturday was the best I've heard from him in a while because you could tell that he was original in describing Lava Man's performance and it just rolled off the tongue..I really enjoyed that call..he need to replicate those types of performances..

I agree on the "Cowabunga dude"...that was really really lame....

Vic has a good sense of humor and is quick-witted, which is helpful for him when on camera, but other than that he is a fairly bad TV personality/commentator....he is too overly opinionated and is a horrible handicapper - and then makes excuses when he loses most of the time....

Best callers: (IMO)

Technical: Trevor Denman - easily the best at this..he calls moves before they happen...great understanding of horses and jockey body language, pace, class, track-play, etc. from gate to wire...

Excitement Component: Tom Durkin - his voice exudes class and prestige, and his stretch calls are so powerful that they emotionally attach you to the race...(although he is not as good as he used to be IMO)..

Most Underated/Unknown: Frank Mirahmadi - This guy is the most talented race caller IMO...he possesses it all...he uses an intelligent vocabulary to describe what is transpiring on the track without over doing it, and his level of excitement with timely adjectives and a raised tone in the stretch is powerful and compelling...On top of that, he is also a very good technical caller, which is far more important to serious horse players than the average racing fan may think.

I agree on the "Cowabunga dude"...that was really really lame....where does Mirahmadi call from? I'm sure if I heard his voice I would realize who we were discussing.

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eurobounce
What I enjoy about Durkin is that the pace of his call matches the pace of the race. He will using a low tone when the pace is fast and then his tone gets higher and speech gets faster as the race goes faster and get heated.

Denamn is unreal at spotting a horse that is going to make a move when he actually hasnt made it yet. He is extremely good at that.

I like Vic alot but I can always tell when he has money on a horse in the race he is calling. That drives me crazy.

Your exaclty right about gambling announcers, and Vic is one of them...you can ALWAYS tell who there money is on and that is a pet peeve of mine too because it compromises the entire call IMO...Terry Wallace is the worst about that (and the worst about most things as a caller (LOL)), and one time I laughed my ass off when he was calling a horse as:

"and now flying from the back of the pack is Chindi..Chindi is picking 'em up and laying down and is stroming home to another win in the King Cotton Stakes.."

..the freakin' horse finished like 4th and he never acknowledged the first three finishers until after they crossed the wire....It really made me mad and so embarrased that he did that..

As for Durkin, your right...he is good at that, but I think he doesn't take his job as seriously as he used to..he takes some days off where he is lifeless on the Mike...kind of like TO taking plays off as a snobby WR....speaking of pace with him, that is another thing he has gotten horrible at judging IMO...he yells emphatically about these blistering 22 and three opening quarter miles like it is a suicide pace, but in fact it is a moderate pace for most of the class of horses he does that to...I think to myself evertime he makes a big deal about a fast pace: "What the hell is he talking about?"...and usually the speed always wins or holds on well.....not a very good "technical" caller IMO..

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suffolk Shippers
I agree on the "Cowabunga dude"...that was really really lame....where does Mirahmadi call from? I'm sure if I heard his voice I would realize who we were discussing.


He used to call at Hialeah Park before it shut down and then called at Louisiana Downs for several years and now calls the Fair circuit in California....you may have heard him subbing in at Fair Grounds or Turf Paradise on occasion...he used to start the old FG meets when the Krantz family owned the track because Wrona couldn't fulfill his calling duties in November, and he would also finish Turf Paradise for Luke Krybosche when Luke had to go to Churchill Downs....he's good

Rupert Pupkin 06-12-2006 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eurobounce
Does anyone else get a kick out of him like I do. This dude was cracking me up over the weekend on TVG. Not too crazy about his picks but he is one funny dude.

I'm with you. I love Vic. He is very colorful and very entertaining. My two favorite announcers are Vic and Tom Durkin.

disappearingdan_akaplaya 06-12-2006 04:00 PM

i became fond of vic several years back when he called 1 race meet here in chicago@hawthorne just before he moved onto the big time........was very sad to see him go! i like dooley was well and some of his lines are very catchy like"shes charging faster than a little girl with daddys credit card" but at the same time other lines are very cheesey! wrona is my fav caller in the game, and my 2nd kevin goemmer(rip) passed away a couple of years ago unfortunately

oracle80 06-12-2006 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cunningham Racing
I love his dedication to our sport, but I think that he is one of the least talented race callers...my personal opinion....his calls are very average from a technical standpoint, and he offers to much post race analysis after the horses cross the wire....his strong suit is the excitement element he adds to the races - which might be the best in the country outside of Durkin, as far as getting you excited in the finish/stretch run of the race...also, I hate announcers who you can tell have premeditated adjectives in place for certain events that may take place, and Vic is bad about that...it ruins it for me when I hear something that you can tell he thought up the night before, like when Surf Cat won a few weeks ago and he sad "Cowabunga Dude!" at the sixteenth pole...horrible...his stretch call in the Whittingham Saturday was the best I've heard from him in a while because you could tell that he was original in describing Lava Man's performance and it just rolled off the tongue..I really enjoyed that call..he need to replicate those types of performances..

Vic has a good sense of humor and is quick-witted, which is helpful for him when on camera, but other than that he is a fairly bad TV personality/commentator....he is too overly opinionated and is a horrible handicapper - and then makes excuses when he loses most of the time....

Best callers: (IMO)

Technical: Trevor Denman - easily the best at this..he calls moves before they happen...great understanding of horses and jockey body language, pace, class, track-play, etc. from gate to wire...

Excitement Component: Tom Durkin - his voice exudes class and prestige, and his stretch calls are so powerful that they emotionally attach you to the race...(although he is not as good as he used to be IMO)..

Most Underated/Unknown: Frank Mirahmadi - This guy is the most talented race caller IMO...he possesses it all...he uses an intelligent vocabulary to describe what is transpiring on the track without over doing it, and his level of excitement with timely adjectives and a raised tone in the stretch is powerful and compelling...On top of that, he is also a very good technical caller, which is far more important to serious horse players than the average racing fan may think.


Joel putting Trevor ahead of Durkin is just plain foolish. Perhaps you don't realize this but Trevor fails to do a "little" thing thats called giving fractions. Now that may not seem like such a big deal, but every time Durkin has to interrupt his call to give a fraction it interrupts teh flow of his call and also causes him to have to start with a new cadence upon resuming the fractional call. Now look, if Durkin didn't have to interrupt his superlatives and adjectives with the fractional call(like every great race caller in history has done) I'm sure his calls could be every bit as "technical" as Trevors. fact is Trevor has always punked out and not called fractions so he can showboat with adjectives. hes about 1/10th the race caller that Durkin is.

Scav 06-12-2006 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by disappearingdan_akaplaya
i became fond of vic several years back when he called 1 race meet here in chicago@hawthorne just before he moved onto the big time........was very sad to see him go! i like dooley was well and some of his lines are very catchy like"shes charging faster than a little girl with daddys credit card" but at the same time other lines are very cheesey! wrona is my fav caller in the game, and my 2nd kevin goemmer(rip) passed away a couple of years ago unfortunately

Playa, have you heard him use that credit card line again, after the first time? I watch ALOT of Arlignton races and since that day that he used it, I HAVE NOT heard it again. I like that

Seattleallstar 06-12-2006 05:06 PM

Durkin
John G

the best 2 in the game

Denman, and Stauffer battle for 3rd and 4th. Somewhere in between is Dave Johnson

Then below that is Luke K, Hoover at Keenland, Larry Colmus, Michael Wrona, Tony Calo

Seattleallstar 06-12-2006 05:08 PM

i think we are all in agreement that Battaglia sucks

rockhardtenfan 06-12-2006 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seattleallstar
i think we are all in agreement that Battaglia sucks

That he does. I don't like VS either tho.

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oracle80
Joel putting Trevor ahead of Durkin is just plain foolish. Perhaps you don't realize this but Trevor fails to do a "little" thing thats called giving fractions. Now that may not seem like such a big deal, but every time Durkin has to interrupt his call to give a fraction it interrupts teh flow of his call and also causes him to have to start with a new cadence upon resuming the fractional call. Now look, if Durkin didn't have to interrupt his superlatives and adjectives with the fractional call(like every great race caller in history has done) I'm sure his calls could be every bit as "technical" as Trevors. fact is Trevor has always punked out and not called fractions so he can showboat with adjectives. hes about 1/10th the race caller that Durkin is.

I couldn't agree less, but that is your opinion and you're entitled to it..

..When I say technical, I am referring to everything except the glamorous voice and vivid adjectives or anything else that is cosmetic about the race call. A good technical race caller paints the best picture of how the race is unfolding...it takes great forecasting and handicapping ability and Denman is leaps and bounds better at it than Durkin....I've seen several races in New York where a jockey dropped his stick, or there was significant bumping, or a horse was closing from the clouds and Durkin never saw him....

..great example was this year's Wood Memorial..Durkin was so caught up on Keyed Entry and Bob and John walking home in that race that he didn't even mention ONE WORD about Jazil closing until after the wire he yelled "Jazil"...horrible...How can you miss a horse that closes from 20 lengths out of it?..I was hoping he would win to see how Durkin was going to wiggle out of it..LOL.

Denman understands the horses a lot more than Durkin and it shows in his race calls.....Howvere, I do prefer the class and power in Durkin's stretch calls.

As for the fractions, Denman will say them when he feels that they are relavent....Durkin thinks every first quarter is "blistering"..it's hilarious.

As a horse player, I guess I don't value a race caller telling me the fractions unless they matter...i.e. too fast or too slow...I have trained myself to get the fractions off the monitor because they are available to read a few seconds before Durkin says anything - thus he is being redundant half of the time he is saying the fractions anyway....I would rather an announcer be accurate with his call and be able to see things that are about to happen and communicate them fast - instead of reacting late like guys like Tom Durkin and Terry Wallace do most of the time....just my opinion...

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seattleallstar
i think we are all in agreement that Battaglia sucks

No argument here...aside from his annoying voice and cadence, he is another horrible reactor...horses rally passed other horses to the front before he even mentions them....

oracle80 06-12-2006 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cunningham Racing
I couldn't agree less, but that is your opinion and you're entitled to it..

..When I say technical, I am referring to everything except the glamorous voice and vivid adjectives or anything else that is cosmetic about the race call. A good technical race caller paints the best picture of how the race is unfolding...it takes great forecasting and handicapping ability and Denman is leaps and bounds better at it than Durkin....I've seen several races in New York where a jockey dropped his stick, or there was significant bumping, or a horse was closing from the clouds and Durkin never saw him....

..great example was this year's Wood Memorial..Durkin was so caught up on Keyed Entry and Bob and John walking home in that race that he didn't even mention ONE WORD about Jazil closing until after the wire he yelled "Jazil"...horrible...How can you miss a horse that closes from 20 lengths out of it?..I was hoping he would win to see how Durkin was going to wiggle out of it..LOL.

Denman understands the horses a lot more than Durkin and it shows in his race calls.....Howvere, I do prefer the class and power in Durkin's stretch calls.

As for the fractions, Denman will say them when he feels that they are relavent....Durkin thinks every first quarter is "blistering"..it's hilarious.

As a horse player, I guess I don't value a race caller telling me the fractions unless they matter...i.e. too fast or too slow...I have trained myself to get the fractions off the monitor because they are available to read a few seconds before Durkin says anything - thus he is being redundant half of the time he is saying the fractions anyway....I would rather an announcer be accurate with his call and be able to see things that are about to happen and communicate them fast - instead of reacting late like guys like Tom Durkin and Terry Wallace do most of the time....just my opinion...


Joel when Durkin came up full fledged simulcasting and in house tv screens were not in abundance. back then to accurately call a race for the majority of listeners you had to give fractions. And if you don't think working in fractions is a lot harder than saying "they're going every fast early" you are kidding yourself. I agree that with in house tv's everywhere and full fledged simulcasting all over the country that giving fractional times is not as important as it was, but Trevor has been calling here since the mid 80's and I can remember only getting the call and not the picture back then in college and screaming "why won't this foreign fruitcake give me the fractions?!! "

Seattleallstar 06-12-2006 07:27 PM

Durkin is the best, if anyone disputes this then I dont know anymore. He paints such a vivid picture and tells a story in his race calls, dont know anyone else who can do that.

Kent Desormeaux imploring Real Quiet
Rock of Gibraltar languishing in back
Jerry Bailey has St Liam In hand
War Emblem hes got another gear
Funny Cide the gutsy gelding

a picture is worth a thousand words, this photo is worth 5 million-- I mean whoa who else can come up with that

oracle80 06-12-2006 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seattleallstar
Durkin is the best, if anyone disputes this then I dont know anymore. He paints such a vivid picture and tells a story in his race calls, dont know anyone else who can do that.

Kent Desormeaux imploring Real Quiet
Rock of Gibraltar languishing in back
Jerry Bailey has St Liam In hand
War Emblem hes got another gear
Funny Cide the gutsy gelding

a picture is worth a thousand words, this photo is worth 5 million-- I mean whoa who else can come up with that


Mike Smith asking Lure for everything he's got!!! AND HES GETTING IT!!!!
Chris McCarron IMMPLLOORRRING Deputy Commander for ONE MORE FURLONG!!!!
Unbridled!!! gets to the front!!! AND WINNNSSSS!!!!!

Compare that to that wing sprouting bull**** with an accent no less.

Seattleallstar 06-12-2006 07:31 PM

ya follow!

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 07:33 PM

That's why this game is great...we all have opinions and we are all right...some like announcers for certain reasons and some like announcers for other reasons...I come from the new school of horse players and I prefer better technical race callers, and I will say this - the struggle of our industry right now is that we haven't been able to adapt and lure in the new school horse players of tomorrow...the NTRA and tracks have struggled miserably with marketing to the next generation of horse players, WHOM EMBRACE TECHNOLOGY.....we don't care about Durkin wasting time telling us fractions because we know that we can read them off the monitor 3 seconds before Durkin announces them....we just wish that Durkin wouldn't misslead people into thinking horses are running a "blistering" pace all of the time when they really are not...when Bishop Court Hill won the Carter wire-to-wire earlier this year, Durkin yelled "and he ran the first quarter in a blistering 22 and 1" and I was thinking to myself "What the hell is he talking about...this pace is VERY moderate for these kind of horses"...and sure enough, he drew away to win gate to wire....horrible call and it is because he doesn't understand racing as well as the likes of Denman, etc.....just my opinion..

oracle80 06-12-2006 07:34 PM

Well you have to admit that the wing sprouting nonsense that Trevor uses is as bad as anything in racing. The guy who calls Finger lakes has more dignity than to use a horrible line like that!!!

Seattleallstar 06-12-2006 07:37 PM

damn technology, I care about the quality and detail of a race call. If 22.1 isnt a blistering pace, then I dunno..lol 22.1 in Ny is blistering my friend

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seattleallstar
Durkin is the best, if anyone disputes this then I dont know anymore. He paints such a vivid picture and tells a story in his race calls, dont know anyone else who can do that.

Kent Desormeaux imploring Real Quiet
Rock of Gibraltar languishing in back
Jerry Bailey has St Liam In hand
War Emblem hes got another gear
Funny Cide the gutsy gelding

a picture is worth a thousand words, this photo is worth 5 million-- I mean whoa who else can come up with that

He is the most exciting...I'm not arguing that point...his adjectives and overall prestige are great and that is why he deserves to call the big races...he adds a very solid, sort-of human interest element..

Gander 06-12-2006 07:42 PM

Lets face it, Durkin use to be a lot better. He is missing horses like Jazil closing in the Wood and he refuses to call photos anymore. In fact he calls that there is a photo finish before the horses even hit the line, in races where there is a clear winner. He did that the other day in a race. The race was won by almost a half length.

He doesnt have the balls to make an assumption on races where any nitwit can see who won. Stoffer and Denman almost always do unless the race is a blanket headbob finish.

I have to agree, I like Durkin's voice better than Denmans, but I agree Denman is a far more astute caller of the game. Maybe its time for Tom to retire and leave his best calls behind them, thats clearly where they are.

As far as Battaglia goes, that guy just simply needs help. Hes an utter mess.

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oracle80
Well you have to admit that the wing sprouting nonsense that Trevor uses is as bad as anything in racing. The guy who calls Finger lakes has more dignity than to use a horrible line like that!!!

Yeah, I'm not a fan of his showboating in the stretch either...plus, I'm not crazy about foreign voices, either...I know Wrona very well from working at FG and while I like Michael a lot, the foriegn voice just has never done it for me..Again, I think the new age horse player and horse racing fan likes guys who are good technical callers and are contemperary with their vocabulary...that is why Frank Mirahmadi is my personal favorite....I don't listen to the rest of them other than Denman because he is precise with his calls from the gate to the stretch..

Gander 06-12-2006 07:44 PM

And "the gutsy gelding" isnt as cheesy as that pizza I just downed? Pleeeasse. Horrible line and so overused and beaten to death.

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seattleallstar
damn technology, I care about the quality and detail of a race call. If 22.1 isnt a blistering pace, then I dunno..lol 22.1 in Ny is blistering my friend

:eek:

Not that day on a sealed track for Grade I horses...comon, you know better than that...Anew just went 22 flat this past weekend in the True North and finished like a gorilla in the stretch...Grade I or II sprinters can go 21 seconds all day long...

Gander 06-12-2006 07:56 PM

Thats because he had a bunch of sea monkeys chasing him. Tiger is an utter mess and only won his last race due to a dream set up trip. Even his trainer admitted that 4/5 on his horse was one of the most weird odds hes ever seen on one of his own horses.

Cunningham Racing 06-12-2006 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gander
Thats because he had a bunch of sea monkeys chasing him. Tiger is an utter mess and only won his last race due to a dream set up trip. Even his trainer admitted that 4/5 on his horse was one of the most weird odds hes ever seen on one of his own horses.

I hate to break it to you but 22 and change is not a blistering half mile for top class sprinters and I think I'm in the majority with most analysts when I state that....if I bet a graded stakes horse who carves out the first quarter os a race in 22 and change on a clear lead, I'm doing back flips I'm so happy...

Suffolk Shippers 06-12-2006 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seattleallstar
i think we are all in agreement that Battaglia sucks

every race starts with "fooooooooooor the leaaaaaaaaaaad"

ArlJim78 06-12-2006 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suffolk Shippers
I think Vic is a great race caller, only behind John Dooley in my eyes. He is sometimes comical on TVG, but when he hosted 58 flat last week, he fell 58 flat on his face. I dont hold it against him though, not his style.

Wow Suffolk you've really got Dooley up there! Above Stauffer? I agree with what some others have said about him personally, he is a great guy, very nice.

But I've got to tell you that for me he is not that far above Battaglia and a few others as a caller. It's not that he doesn't call a fairly accurate race, he does. It's just the corny expressions, the mechanical ennunciation and his nasally voice that really grate on me.

"Earlie Fires partners number 5 Brittle Shins next into the gate"
"The milers meet up with the main track"
"Bronco Billy! is being produced down the center of the track"
so and so is "holding favoritism" at two to one.
plus all of the this's and that's.

Like I said he annoys me but seems like a very genuine and nice guy.

Suffolk Shippers 06-12-2006 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gander
And "the gutsy gelding" isnt as cheesy as that pizza I just downed? Pleeeasse. Horrible line and so overused and beaten to death.

might be over used now that Funny Cide has raced 20 times since he used it at the Derby. However, at the time it fit perfectly. Funny Cide toughened up and passed a stubborn Peace Rules AND held off the favorite Empire Maker, a "gutsy" effort for a 12-1 shot, and just adding the point he was a gelding.

Certainly better than Stauffer's "Cowabunga Dude" for Surf Cat three weeks ago, which made little relevant sense to the race and was just plain lame.
And I like Vic, think he is a good caller.

Also, as mentioned before, Larry Collmus who does Monmouth, Suffolk and Aqueduct is very under rated.

Suffolk Shippers 06-12-2006 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArlJim78
Wow Suffolk you've really got Dooley up there! Above Stauffer? I agree with what some others have said about him personally, he is a great guy, very nice.

But I've got to tell you that for me he is not that far above Battaglia and a few others as a caller. It's not that he doesn't call a fairly accurate race, he does. It's just the corny expressions, the mechanical ennunciation and his nasally voice that really grate on me.

"Earlie Fires partners number 5 Brittle Shins next into the gate"
"The milers meet up with the main track"
"Bronco Billy! is being produced down the center of the track"
so and so is "holding favoritism" at two to one.
plus all of the this's and that's.

Like I said he annoys me but seems like a very genuine and nice guy.

I guess we just disagree on this one :rolleyes: . I will concede he does use some corny expressions and earlier in the thread I did mention his hench for always nothing "and SO and SO WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINS the one o'clock opener".

I must say everyone of the expressions you note above are DEAD ON hahaha and I'm laughing about it. But you forgot, "CD Player HOLDS THE LINE on the front end BUT HERE COMES Saratoga Paperclip rallying on the grandstand side!!!!"

All this Dooley stuff has me laughing now :cool:

Suffolk Shippers 06-12-2006 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cunningham Racing
No argument here...aside from his annoying voice and cadence, he is another horrible reactor...horses rally passed other horses to the front before he even mentions them....

this isnt accurate. horses put others away by 7 or 8 lengths before Battaglia even mentions that the one doing the passing is rallying or "launching a bid" as Durkin would say :cool:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.