![]() |
San Bernardino
|
Just awful, and im so tired of these things happening, and nothing changes.
|
There have been 355 mass shootings in the USA this year so far. That's more than 1 a day.
But apparently, Syrian refugees are what we should all be scared of. ![]() |
If this happens anywhere else in the world it is called a terrorist attack by a home grown jihadist but since it happpens here it is the guns that are at fault.
|
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/02/politi...rch/index.html
i had no idea that they had passed such a thing. i find it shocking. i have a concealed carry permit, and i now carry all the time. |
At least in mass they don't give those carry a concealed out to every tom dick or Mary. Especially Mary , who shouldn't be playing with guns anyway
|
Quote:
|
According to this Daily Mail article, Tashfeen Malik, 27, came from Saudi Arabia earlier this year.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...by-mother.html No word on whether she was thoroughly vetted. |
Quote:
'the handguns by Farook himself and the assault rifles by a third party.' wonder who the third party is.... |
Quote:
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/san...e-visa-n473791 |
Quote:
The female, a Qatari with a Pakistani passport returning from Saudi Arabia with a recently radicalized American of Islamic decent. No red flags here. Too bad they didn't just go through Chechnya on their return. We're are watching that place now. I guess we'll just keep burying Americans as we check off all of places that bad people come from. Cuz it's "Un-American" and it "looks bad" to be vigilant. Good news is that this is all completely contained...JV team and what not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/12/04/us...l?eref=edition 14 dedicated Americans and their families will not be celebrating the holidays with each other as a result of this criminal's administration who passes out visas like candy to virtually any muslim that wants in. So..yeah. Undocumented Syrian refugees, with no passports or any verifiable documentation are no threat at all. Plus they will be thoroughly "vetted" by Obama's clown college, so anyone that's alarmed by this inane stance is a racist. Got it. |
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/gop-block...ts-buying-guns
'The measure would have denied people on the terrorist watch list the ability to buy guns.' 'the Washington Post reported that suspected terrorists had successfully purchased more than 2,000 guns from American dealers between 2004 and 2014' thoughts? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
exactly what i was thinking!! sorry sir, you cannot fly. oh. can i buy a gun? sure. ten? absolutely! it's crazy. |
Why? I tuned in to msnbc whilst driving around a while ago. They're still peddling the workplace violence/disgruntled employee meme. Dolts. AG Loretta Lynch tells us that "we're at the point where these issues have come together really like never before in law enforcement thought and in our nation's history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity and a wonderful moment to really make significant change." She further vowed to go after those who use anti-Muslim speech that "edges toward violence," because her "greatest fear" is the "incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric" in America. Not to mention global warming, er, climate change. This list https://grabien.com/story.php?id=42763 grows longer by the hour. |
Quote:
|
Muslim leader from CAIR (the same winner that got out in front of the cameras before the FBI even got involved to extol the virtues of these two upstanding muslims) now saying it's our fault:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/04...error-attacks/ How CAIR is not regarded as a hate group (or at least regarded as terrorist sympathizers) defies comprehension |
Quote:
No surprise there. It's worth noting that the UAE has designated CAIR as a terrorist organization. The UAE isn't constrained by PC handcuffs. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:tro: |
He is right on this, it is insane.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama-ren...ls-gun-control The fact this failed is absolutely indefensible and is truly mind boggling. |
If your too busy to tune into our leader's speech tonight, I'll give you the talking points.
5 minutes will be spent on the fairytale 60 nation coalition to defeat ISIL. 25 minutes will be extolling american values as an all inclusive nation. 5 minutes on the bad guns that caused this incident to happen, and the new gun laws that are needed. |
Quote:
Keeping those on the no-fly list from buying guns sounds right, doesn't it? http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/04/op...terrorism.html But wait -- just a year ago http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/19/op...?_r=1&referer= But hey, these might be dangerous folks, right? Including the 72 Department of Homeland Security employees who are on the list? Why haven't they been fired? Why haven't the hundreds of thousands on the list been arrested? Detained? Snap! Due process. Who wasn't on the no-fly list? The San Bernardino shooters. The Fort Hood shooter. The Chattanooga shooter. The Boston bombers. So once again our President proposes something which sounds like it might be effective, but wouldn't have prevented that with which he justifies it. No thanks, I am not in favor of the government denying second amendment rights based on a secret list that only they control. |
so you think that an event like this shouldn't be used to go after others not tied to the event? not used to make a blanket policy?
|
See if this opinion piece helps to convey my thinking. I have a helluvalotta respect for the author.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...re-terrorists/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
that's the issue with many things, there are no easy answers. and we all want them, don't we? seems on the face of it, that if someone is deemed to dangerous to fly in or out of country, they should be too dangerous to buy a gun. but who decides who is on the list, and how do they decide? same as if someone is mentally ill, who decides? and as we know from past experience, any and every program under the sun has people who abuse it, and people who use it for their own personal vendettas. |
Secret US Policy Blocks Agents From Looking at Social Media of Visa Applicants, Former Official Says
http://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-us-p...refer_homepage “It was primarily a question of optics,” said Cohen. “There were concerns from a privacy and civil liberties perspective that while this was not illegal, that it would be viewed negatively if it was disclosed publicly.” Another former counter-terrorism official cosigned Cohen’s frustration. “Why the State Department and Homeland Security Department have not leveraged the power of social media is beyond me.” . . . |
That's so stupid...public postings aren't a privacy issue at all. Unbelievable.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.