Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Obama Pays Respects to Serial Abuser/Pediphile (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=56341)

dellinger63 01-28-2015 10:41 AM

Obama Pays Respects to Serial Abuser/Pediphile
 
And bowed to him when he was alive.:wf

A 48 year old man marrying and impregnating a 15 year old, having 30 wives, beating a woman for divorcing him, and then using his sons to beat and imprison their adult sisters is to be spit on, not respected.

Quote:

In 1972, when he was 48, King Abdullah took a 15-year-old Jordanian-born wife, Alanoud Al-Fayez. The marriage was arranged; she was one of 30 wives. In four years, she produced four daughters — infuriating the king, who wanted more sons. (He only has seven sons — and 15 known daughters.)

For this crime, Abdullah divorced Alanoud. But he beat her, too, and prevented her from taking care of her daughters when they were ill. In 2001, she fled the kingdom, hoping that as a father, Abdullah would treat his own daughters with more kindness.

She was wrong. In addition to having a mother who “got away,” these daughters, Sahar, Maha, Hala and Jawaher Al Saud, now in their late 30s and early 40s, dared speak out for women’s rights. Their punishment has been extreme and long-lasting.

The princesses are seen with their father, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz. From left: Sahar, Jawaher, Hala (on the king’s shoulders) and Maha.

For 13 years, the unmarried princesses have been confined in pairs, isolated from outside contact — beaten, drugged, deprived of food and water for periods of time, slowly starved, subjected to heat without air-conditioning in the desert clime.

According to their mother’s account, and to a video that Sahar and Jawaher smuggled out, the princesses claim that their “half-brothers beat them with sticks” and “yell at us and tell us we will die here.”

Sahar also told The Post, “My father said that after his death, our brothers would continue to detain us and abuse us.”
http://nypost.com/2015/01/27/the-fou...-muslim-women/

At least the new King ignored Michelle Obama, who was accompanying the President as opposed to slapping her. The Saudi media showed how progressive they've become by simply blurring Michelle's face.Baby steps! :wf

Quote:

First lady Michelle Obama’s face was reportedly blurred by Saudi state television Tuesday as she and the president met with new Saudi King Salman in Riyadh, although officials deny the claim.

The new Saudi king shook hands with President Obama at the Erga Palace but did not acknowledge the first lady at all during a brief aside at the funeral for King Abdullah, Bloomberg View reported.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...-state-televi/

Kasept 01-28-2015 11:22 AM

But it was OK for the Bushes to suck his cock and do his bidding for years?

Pants II 01-28-2015 11:28 AM

They continue to do so after his death, Steve.

But :tro::tro::tro::tro:

ROFL

The Kingdom is the largest shareholder of Faux News outside of Murdoch, Dell.

Think about how many times stories have been edited by Faux concerning THE KINGDOM.

dellinger63 01-28-2015 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept (Post 1014002)
But it was OK for the Bushes to suck his cock and do his bidding for years?

FDR started the circle jerk. And no it was not OK for the Bushes especially the 'scuttling' of the investigation of who (Saudis) financed the 9-11 attackers and enabling those suspected (Saudis) to flee.

My question is why the crime of impregnating a child, and one with no free will, OK and ignored because of where on this earth it occurred?

dellinger63 01-28-2015 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants II (Post 1014005)

The Kingdom is the largest shareholder of Faux News outside of Murdoch, Dell.

Think about how many times stories have been edited by Faux concerning THE KINGDOM.

And Giuliani told him to stick his $10 million. Probably why he's never on FOX

Instead of arguing which party swallows better can't we unite and condemn this man for what he did during his life?

jms62 01-28-2015 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 1014009)
And Giuliani told him to stick his $10 million. Probably why he's never on FOX

Instead of arguing which party swallows better can't we unite and condemn this man for what he did during his life?

Well that would be nice BUT you are the one that threw the first punch without expecting it to be called that your guy was doing the same thing or worse. The title says it all

bigrun 01-28-2015 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept (Post 1014002)
But it was OK for the Bushes to suck his cock and do his bidding for years?

Not bad at kissing either:eek:








mark2061mn 01-28-2015 03:56 PM

:
Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 1014017)
Well that would be nice BUT you are the one that threw the first punch without expecting it to be called that your guy was doing the same thing or worse. The title says it all

:tro:

Danzig 01-28-2015 04:04 PM

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...important.html



The longtime coziness between the oil kingdom and the leader of the free world has gone cold for some time and turned frigid in 2013, when Obama refrained from bombing Syria and undertook negotiations with Iran—the Saudis’ two main enemies. Those moves came in the wake of Obama’s abandonment of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, their main ally, during the Arab Spring protests of 2011.

At the low point, Saudi Arabia’s intelligence chief and former longtime ambassador to Washington, Prince Bandar Sultan al-Saud, publicly grumbled that the kingdom was losing trust in Obama’s judgment and might reassess the whole web of relations between the two powers.

Obama didn’t panic over the threat, nor did he need to. Bandar’s rhetorical flourishes coincided with, and may have reflected, a weakening of Saudi power—its standing as the world’s largest petroleum supplier, the basis of its international influence, having just been overtaken by the United States. For once, they needed our arms more than we needed their oil.

dellinger63 01-28-2015 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 1014009)

Instead of arguing which party swallows better can't we unite and condemn this man for what he did during his life?

Thought so....zzzzzz

chirp-chirp-chirp

Pants II 01-28-2015 10:07 PM

Dell it is not an issue worth discussing. Americans will have to learn the hard way.

Side note...

Glancing over the quote from the Slate article...heh. I guess the Sauds are losing influence. They have absolutely nothing to do with the plunge in oil.

:D

dellinger63 01-29-2015 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants II (Post 1014048)
Dell it is not an issue worth discussing. Americans will have to learn the hard way.

What's sad is if the King was abusing his dogs like he did his women, Americans would be all over him. :wf

somerfrost 01-29-2015 01:09 PM

Foreign policy is a bitch, on the one hand we stand behind perverts like this guy, on the other hand we selectively take on other bad guys like Saddam, Kadafi and the Shaw and we end up with worse...the enemy of my enemy is my friend...if only the real world was that simple.

GenuineRisk 01-29-2015 09:56 PM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-...b_4840060.html

Pants II 01-30-2015 05:29 AM

King of Michigan?

ROFL

Why not post a link to Savior Bill and the Epstein Factory?

:D

Danzig 01-30-2015 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk (Post 1014115)

when huckabee was on the daily show, and john stewart showed video of him playing bass alongside ted nugent, i was really hoping he'd bring up the underage girl...the one ted had 'custody' of.

dellinger63 01-30-2015 08:15 AM

With such virulent condemnation of the King's crimes against women (actually his wives and daughters) by our two resident feminists, change is surely coming. :rolleyes:

I suppose as long as there's an abortion clinic, within easy driving distance, for every woman in the U.S. and all female law students at Georgetown are afforded free BC, all is good in this world.

Kasept 02-04-2015 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants II (Post 1014005)
They continue to do so after his death, Steve.

But :tro::tro::tro:

ROFL

The Kingdom is the largest shareholder of Faux News outside of Murdoch, Dell.

Think about how many times stories have been edited by Faux concerning THE KINGDOM.

Coach..

Timely notes pertaining to your contributions.. :tro:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/us...aeda.html?_r=0

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...to-1-from-6-6-

Kasept 02-04-2015 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 1014008)
FDR started the circle jerk. And no it was not OK for the Bushes especially the 'scuttling' of the investigation of who (Saudis) financed the 9-11 attackers and enabling those suspected (Saudis) to flee.

My question is why the crime of impregnating a child, and one with no free will, OK and ignored because of where on this earth it occurred?

You really can't help yourself. FDR? So strategic alliances trying to win WWII doesn't measure up as a bona fide reason to open relations with Saudi Arabia? You'll twist yourself into a pretzel to tie anything to a perceived malfeasance by Democratic management.

dellinger63 02-04-2015 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kasept (Post 1014599)
You really can't help yourself. FDR? So strategic alliances trying to win WWII doesn't measure up as a bona fide reason to open relations with Saudi Arabia? You'll twist yourself into a pretzel to tie anything to a perceived malfeasance by Democratic management.

Can we stop the pissing match and simply focus on the condemnation of the barbaric, backwards culture that allows a 48 year old to 'own' a 15 year old bride. Regardless of party or President?

GenuineRisk 02-04-2015 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 1014609)
Can we stop the pissing match and simply focus on the condemnation of the barbaric, backwards culture that allows a 48 year old to 'own' a 15 year old bride. Regardless of party or President?

Dell, women are second class citizens everywhere in the world. Hell, here in the USA we have cultures that endorse 48 year old men marrying multiple teenage wives. And just because it's technically illegal here doesn't mean much to the women to whom it's happening in this nation, as we speak.

Polygyny (and polyandry, in the few cultures where that occurs) become the norm in various parts of the world for multiple reasons. But criticizing cultures as "backward" doesn't do anything towards creating equality of opportunity for those being affected, any more than calling anti-vaxxers morons is going to get them to do their civic duty and get their kids vaccinated.

EDIT to add: Well, okay, there are forager cultures that come much closer to gender equality than we do. Again, due to myriad factors.

dellinger63 02-04-2015 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GenuineRisk (Post 1014612)
Dell, women are second class citizens everywhere in the world. Hell, here in the USA we have cultures that endorse 48 year old men marrying multiple teenage wives. And just because it's technically illegal here doesn't mean much to the women to whom it's happening in this nation, as we speak.

Let's be honest. We have cults here in the USA that endorse such and let's not forget to include MANBLA's position that 48 year old men should be able to teach sex to gay young boys.

Thankfully it's not 'our culture' and the women and boys 'victimized' here in the US have numerous resources including the law and general public on their side. Sadly the same thing can't be said for many places in the rest of the world.

I've always maintained that women will change the cultures that need changing because as experience has taught us the men are content maintaining the status quo.

GenuineRisk 02-04-2015 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 1014623)
Thankfully it's not 'our culture' and the women and boys 'victimized' here in the US have numerous resources including the law and general public on their side.


Danzig 02-04-2015 05:41 PM

And can someone fix the spelling in the title....i keep thinking the thread is about rex ryan.

dellinger63 02-04-2015 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 1014652)
And can someone fix the spelling in the title....i keep thinking the thread is about rex ryan.

:zz::zz:

The 'new' village idiot has spoken!

Rudeboyelvis 02-04-2015 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellinger63 (Post 1014124)
With such virulent condemnation of the King's crimes against women (actually his wives and daughters) by our two resident feminists, change is surely coming. :rolleyes:

I suppose as long as there's an abortion clinic, within easy driving distance, for every woman in the U.S. and all female law students at Georgetown are afforded free BC, all is good in this world.

I'm DYING to know where the feigned "outrage" of all of this was when you Republitards were in charge and oil was 100+ a barrel.

Oh, You were still sucking the same dick, but now you aren't stuffing currency in your oil-laden tills, so NOW its all about the poor, downtrodden commonfolk

Shill.

Keep on keepin' on.

How about the poor, under-privileged, downtrodden, young girls your pal Rush Limbaugh "enjoyed" on his viagra-fueled trip to the Dominican Republic?!

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documen...can-stag-party

What about them??


Don't they matter??


Hypocrite.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.