Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Now this is what I call trolling! (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=48375)

Calzone Lord 09-14-2012 12:16 PM

Now this is what I call trolling!
 
Here is the movie (or 14 mintues of it anyway) that has inspired attacks on US Embassies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=qmodVun16Q4


A+ for trolling

F for acting and screenplay.

Riot 09-14-2012 12:26 PM

Wish we could lock the crazy, hate-filled religious extremists from all sides in one big colosseum, and let them fight it out among themselves.

MaTH716 09-14-2012 12:34 PM

BT = Islamic Terriorst. I guess that expains the beard in Tampa..........

MaTH716 09-14-2012 12:38 PM

Not for anything but at the 2:53 mark, they say to "name him Mohammad", the actor looks like he is mouthing something else and Mohammad has been dubbed in.

Danzig 09-14-2012 12:40 PM

it's like a bad porn movie, without the sex.

Riot 09-14-2012 12:40 PM

An obscure slapstick film said to be entitled Innocence of Muslims or Life of Muhammed has been cited as the cause for riots at US diplomatic posts in Egypt and Libya.

But the existence of the purported filmmaker, Sam Bacile, allegedly a 52-year-old Israeli-American real estate developer, has not been proven.

In interviews with the AP news agency and the Wall Street Journal, a man calling himself "Sam Bacile" said he had raised about $5m to produce the film. He also was quoted describing Islam as "a cancer", and claimed he had raised money from "about 100 Jewish donors" to make the video.

But the interview subject did not even give the same age during his two known press interviews, as he told the AP he was 56.

The man said the amateur, two-hour-long film had involved dozens of actors and was produced in California in 2011. But new reports suggest neither any prior social media presence by the director nor any IMDB page for the film.

The director of the California Film Commission - which issues permits for films that are shot in the state, told the Huffington Post that no permit was ever granted to someone by the name "Sam Bacile".

'Desert Warrior'


The trailer for the film - which itself is so far unavailable to the public - portrays Islam’s Prophet Muhammad as a fraud and a womaniser, and depicts him having sex. The entire film has only been shown once in public, at a theatre in Hollywood, said the source who identified himself as "Bacile".

He also explained he made the film because “after 9/11 everybody should be in front of the judge”, AP reported. "Even Jesus, even Muhammad."

But actors who participated in the filming now say they had no idea the film was even about Muhamad or Islam. The original casting call was reportedly for a film called "Desert Warrior" by director Alan Roberts.

And all the film's religious references were actually dubbed after the original shooting.

"Bacile" is now reportedly in hiding, even though reports suggest that the name is merely cover for a larger group, or a pseudonym for someone who may be neither Israeli nor Jewish - but who cited such an identify to inflame tensions.

One of the actresses who says she was tricked into being in the film says "Bacile" told her on set that he was Egyptian, and that he spoke Arabic to other men present.

Reuters has reported that Egypt's Coptic Orthodox church issued a statement condemning some Egyptian Christians living aboard who it said had financed "the production of a film insulting Prophet Muhammad".

In Egypt and Libya, public anger at the video spilled over on Tuesday, leading to the death of the US ambassador in Benghazi, Libya and the evacuation of embassy workers in Cairo.

Spread on social media

How did an obscure film trailer come to have international ramifications? It was first posted on YouTube by a user called "sam bacile" in July 2012, and has received about 450,000 views to date.

The trailer began to get more attention in September. On September 4, the same user posted a version dubbed in Arabic, which has garnered tens of thousands of views.

Morris Sadek, a Coptic Christian born in Egypt but who lives in the US, told AP he had been promoting the film on his website. He also tweeted a link to the trailer on September 9.

Sadek, the head of the National American Coptic Assembly, is known for his vehemently anti-Islam views, and told the Wall Street Journal that “the violence that it [the film] caused in Egypt is further evidence of how violent the religion and people are".

Terry Jones, the Florida pastor whose burning of Qurans in 2011 spurred riots across the Muslim world leading to several deaths, also reportedly promoted the film.

The Arabic version of the trailer received heavy media coverage in Egypt last week, including by controversial hardline TV host Khaled Abdallah, who reported on the film on September 8.

A clip of the show was posted to YouTube on September 9, where it has received almost 400,000 views so far.

"The operation behind this film appears to be extreme Egyptian Copts who want to discredit the Morsi government and create a provocation," journalist Max Blumenthal told Al Jazeera.

"They oppose the revolution and are aligned with Christian right groups who have an apocalyptic, theocratic agenda and who are inciting against Muslim-Americans," Blumenthal said, adding, "They put Muslims in the US in danger, they put Copts in Egypt in danger, and they're putting US diplomats in danger."

YouTube clip blocked


The Afghan government on Wednesday temporarily blocked YouTube in an effort to discourage people from watching the clip. YouTube also blocked the video in Egypt, agency reports said.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, the company said: "We work hard to create a community everyone can enjoy and which also enables people to express different opinions.

"This can be a challenge because what's OK in one country can be offensive elsewhere.

"This video - which is widely available on the web - is clearly within our guidelines and so will stay on YouTube. However, given the very difficult situation in Libya and Egypt we have temporarily restricted access in both countries.

"Our hearts are with the families of the people murdered in [Tuesday's] attack in Libya."

Observers say Google has grown more averse to removing videos. After its 2006 acquisition of YouTube, it was accused of censorship in several high-profile controversies.

"They're squeezed on all sides," said Rebecca MacKinnon, a fellow at the New America Foundation. "But because of pressure from a lot of people who feel they made the wrong decisions, they now generally err on the side of keeping things up."

In recent years, Google has used technology to filter out videos in certain countries to comply with local regulations.

MaTH716 09-14-2012 12:41 PM

The only reason these people should have rioted is, if they were forced to sit through this........................


:wf:wf at the 4:20 mark

Antitrust32 09-14-2012 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calzone Lord (Post 890028)
Here is the movie (or 14 mintues of it anyway) that has inspired attacks on US Embassies.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=qmodVun16Q4


A+ for trolling

F for acting and screenplay.

is it weird that I never met you and dont even know who you are... but I idolize you?

Besides the Beulah Thread... you're the Randy Moss of Derby Trail.

MaTH716 09-14-2012 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 890043)
is it weird that I never met you and dont even know who you are... but I idolize you?

Besides the Beulah Thread... you're the Randy Moss of Derby Trail.

The white or black one?

Antitrust32 09-14-2012 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 890044)
The white or black one?

I almost typed the black one... but since we're talking DrugS here, I figured that would be implied :)


you coming back to tampa in the spring??????

my golf game is getting better.. I'm down to bet anyone except GPK

Riot 09-14-2012 12:50 PM

Man who produced film that sparked death of US embassy staff is bank fraudster with ties to Christian right

California man confirms role in anti-Islam film that sparked deadly Libya violence

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula says he was manager for the company that produced 'Innocence of Muslims,' which mocked Muslims and the prophet Muhammad.

By DPA and The Associated Press | Sep.13, 2012

The search for those behind the provocative, anti-Muslim film implicated in violent protests in Egypt and Libya led Wednesday to a California Coptic Christian convicted of financial crimes who acknowledged his role in managing and providing logistics for the production.

Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, told The Associated Press in an interview outside Los Angeles that he was manager for the company that produced "Innocence of Muslims," which mocked Muslims and the prophet Muhammad and may have caused inflamed mobs that attacked U.S. missions in Egypt and Libya. He provided the first details about a shadowy production group behind the film.

snip

Nakoula, who talked guardedly about his role, pleaded no contest in 2010 to federal bank fraud charges in California and was ordered to pay more than $790,000 in restitution. He was also sentenced to 21 months in federal prison and ordered not to use computers or the Internet for five years without approval from his probation officer.

snip

Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Leigh Williams said Nakoula set up fraudulent bank accounts using stolen identities and Social Security numbers, then checks from those accounts would be deposited into other bogus accounts from which Nakoula would withdraw money at ATM machines.

snip

The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups, said Klein is a former Marine and longtime religious-right activist who has helped train paramilitary militias at a California church. It described Klein as founder of Courageous Christians United, which conducts protests outside abortion clinics, Mormon temples and mosques.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-e...lence-1.464700

MaTH716 09-14-2012 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 890046)
I almost typed the black one... but since we're talking DrugS here, I figured that would be implied :)


you coming back to tampa in the spring??????

my golf game is getting better.. I'm down to bet anyone except GPK

From what I understand, they is going to be a very strong turnout at the Spa next year. So I might try to save my chips and get up there (by myself) for a few days.

Even so, not sure that Tampa is in the cards for this year.

Antitrust32 09-14-2012 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716 (Post 890050)
From what I understand, they is going to be a very strong turnout at the Spa next year. So I might try to save my chips and get up there (by myself) for a few days.

Even so, not sure that Tampa is in the cards for this year.

I had such a great time at Saratoga this year.. if a toga trip is planned instead of a tampa trip, that is a-okay with me.

I just feel like we need to see where things will be headed with NYRA. I really hope next years Saratoga will be the same Saratoga I've known and loved over the past 16 years.

my miss storm cat 09-14-2012 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 890043)
... you're the Randy Moss of Derby Trail.

That's a great line. :D

Thepaindispenser 09-15-2012 05:59 PM

It is obvious by now that the film had nothing to do with the attack on our embassy in Libya. It is the spin by Obama to coverup his failed foreign policies. By the way who cares if the filmmaker has ties to the Christian right. Riot are you trying to say that the filmmaker doesn't have a right to make this film? Good for You Tube and Google for telling Obama where to go when he asked them to take the film off of their sites. Can you imagine a President of the USA putting the feelings of violent,hateful, extremist Islamists over one of our most valuable rights, the right of free speech? Just another reason not to vote for this clown in November.

GBBob 09-15-2012 07:08 PM

[quote=Thepaindispenser;890284]It is obvious by now that the film had nothing to do with the attack on our embassy in Libya. It is the spin by Obama to coverup his failed foreign policies. By the way who cares if the filmmaker has ties to the Christian right. Riot are you trying to say that the filmmaker doesn't have a right to make this film? Good for You Tube and Google for telling Obama where to go when he asked them to take the film off of their sites. Can you imagine a President of the USA putting the feelings of violent,hateful, extremist Islamists over one of our most valuable rights, the right of free speech? Just another reason not to vote for this clown in November.[/QUOTE]

Yup...your brother..or was it friend...or...whatever..he's right..you bring a lot of intelligent debate to this forum:rolleyes:

Thepaindispenser 09-15-2012 07:42 PM

[quote=GBBob;890296]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 890284)
It is obvious by now that the film had nothing to do with the attack on our embassy in Libya. It is the spin by Obama to coverup his failed foreign policies. By the way who cares if the filmmaker has ties to the Christian right. Riot are you trying to say that the filmmaker doesn't have a right to make this film? Good for You Tube and Google for telling Obama where to go when he asked them to take the film off of their sites. Can you imagine a President of the USA putting the feelings of violent,hateful, extremist Islamists over one of our most valuable rights, the right of free speech? Just another reason not to vote for this clown in November.[/QUOTE]

Yup...your brother..or was it friend...or...whatever..he's right..you bring a lot of intelligent debate to this forum:rolleyes:

For Bob if it isn't something supporting or making excuses for all the failed policies of the Obama administration then it isn't intelligent debate. You have a problem with people who happen to disagree with you. Plus you are a hypocrite as you attack the methods of those who disagree with you while you remain silent about the insults and nasty methods used by your fellow ideologue Riot.

Yeah Bob, Obama is really doing a great job. Maybe one day you will open your eyes.

Danzig 09-15-2012 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 890284)
It is obvious by now that the film had nothing to do with the attack on our embassy in Libya. It is the spin by Obama to coverup his failed foreign policies. By the way who cares if the filmmaker has ties to the Christian right. Riot are you trying to say that the filmmaker doesn't have a right to make this film? Good for You Tube and Google for telling Obama where to go when he asked them to take the film off of their sites. Can you imagine a President of the USA putting the feelings of violent,hateful, extremist Islamists over one of our most valuable rights, the right of free speech? Just another reason not to vote for this clown in November.

What has dramatically changed in our foriegn policy in the last 3 1/2 years compared to the last admin? Or the ones before for that matter? Seems the status quo is still the same as its been for years.
And note that as you say, omama asked them to take it down. Didnt order it, he asked.

Thepaindispenser 09-15-2012 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 890304)
What has dramatically changed in our foriegn policy in the last 3 1/2 years compared to the last admin? Or the ones before for that matter? Seems the status quo is still the same as its been for years.
And note that as you say, omama asked them to take it down. Didnt order it, he asked.

What has changed in our foreign policy??? How Russian reset buttons, apologizing to other countries, bowing to murdering dictators, leading from behind, not fighting to win in Afghanistan, withdrawing from Iraq leaving a vacuum that the Iranians are filling, distancing from Israel to appease other countries who seem to respect us less anyway, waging wars without Congressional approval. Yeah Danzig nothing has changed.

Also Danzig, Obama is not an all powerful dictator, although you know he wants to be, so he can't order You Tube and Google to take down videos that aren't violating any laws. Just by asking them, he choose the feelings of murdering, extremist Islamist thugs over a fundamental right for Americans. Also why is the government all of the sudden investigating the filmmaker over an unrelated charge? Obviously to silence him to appease violent, intolerant Islamic thugs.

By the way that video has been up on You Tube for months, only idiots believe Obama's desperate story of that being the reason for the attacks. Even if it was the reason, he should be defending the free speech rights of an American.

Also have you noticed how all of these hypocrites in Hollywood don't have the guts to defend free speech rights here when they defend those rights when any anti-Christian film is made. Let's see if Bill Maher, who made an anti-Christian film and donates heavily to Obama, has the guts to defend the filmmaker here. If he doesn't, he is just another gutless Hollywood hypocrite who will offensively criticize Christianity because he knows no harm will come to him but won't defend someone's rights to criticize Islam because he is afraid of violent Islamic extremists.

Riot 09-15-2012 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 890284)
It is obvious by now that the film had nothing to do with the attack on our embassy in Libya. It is the spin by Obama to coverup his failed foreign policies. By the way who cares if the filmmaker has ties to the Christian right. Riot are you trying to say that the filmmaker doesn't have a right to make this film? Good for You Tube and Google for telling Obama where to go when he asked them to take the film off of their sites. Can you imagine a President of the USA putting the feelings of violent,hateful, extremist Islamists over one of our most valuable rights, the right of free speech? Just another reason not to vote for this clown in November.

Geeshus, Pointman, cut the crap. You're beyond a joke.

Danzig 09-15-2012 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 890312)
What has changed in our foreign policy??? How Russian reset buttons, apologizing to other countries, bowing to murdering dictators, leading from behind, not fighting to win in Afghanistan, withdrawing from Iraq leaving a vacuum that the Iranians are filling, distancing from Israel to appease other countries who seem to respect us less anyway, waging wars without Congressional approval. Yeah Danzig nothing has changed.

Also Danzig, Obama is not an all powerful dictator, although you know he wants to be, so he can't order You Tube and Google to take down videos that aren't violating any laws. Just by asking them, he choose the feelings of murdering, extremist Islamist thugs over a fundamental right for Americans. Also why is the government all of the sudden investigating the filmmaker over an unrelated charge? Obviously to silence him to appease violent, intolerant Islamic thugs.

By the way that video has been up on You Tube for months, only idiots believe Obama's desperate story of that being the reason for the attacks. Even if it was the reason, he should be defending the free speech rights of an American.

Also have you noticed how all of these hypocrites in Hollywood don't have the guts to defend free speech rights here when they defend those rights when any anti-Christian film is made. Let's see if Bill Maher, who made an anti-Christian film and donates heavily to Obama, has the guts to defend the filmmaker here. If he doesn't, he is just another gutless Hollywood hypocrite who will offensively criticize Christianity because he knows no harm will come to him but won't defend someone's rights to criticize Islam because he is afraid of violent Islamic extremists.

our allies and enemies haven't changed a whit. and with obama's drone attacks, he certainly has taken things even further than bush did in that regard. and as for withdrawing from iraq, i'm glad we did that. it was planned before he took office, so that wasn't a change of plan on his part-it was a continuation. his style is different, the policies remain the same.
did you notice the democratic party reaffirming israel being our ally, and them going on record about jerusalem being their capital. that hasn't even been part of our official policy. another step further. saying we are 'resetting' relations with russia is a far cry from actually doing so, and at least the current admin didn't say something as ridiculously stupid as bush did when he said he 'saw in putins eyes' that he was a good guy. now, that's a stroke of naivete if i ever saw one.
we haven't fought to win in afganistan since entering that stupid war. remember, the one war expanding to two, with much of the focus being placed on iraq, where we should never have gone? and had we not gone there, you wouldn't be having the bs with iran that you have-which is exactly why bush one didn't push into iraq back with the first gulf war. and had we not invaded iraq, the focus would have remained solely on afganistan from the start. we went in with guns blazing, completely ignoring history in afganistan, and the fact that a 'war' on terror isn't exactly going to be conventionally fought...and knowing the track records for countries invading that wasteland, it would turn out a waste anyway.
and you're right, nothing has changed. which was my point. we're still involved in the morass bush started in afganistan. we're still seeing problems that came from us going into iraq. meanwhile, everything else is pretty much status quo, except maybe with egypt-and that's probably balanced by libya.


and it's not obama's 'story' that the film was the cause of the attacks. it's the cause of the protests. the attack was pre-planned, and took place when they felt an opportune moment came.
and i guess you've ignored all the people in those countries who are standing up for us, and are ashamed of what's occurred? but then, if you did, it wouldn't help your whole 'obama sucks' argument.

jms62 09-16-2012 07:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 890321)
our allies and enemies haven't changed a whit. and with obama's drone attacks, he certainly has taken things even further than bush did in that regard. and as for withdrawing from iraq, i'm glad we did that. it was planned before he took office, so that wasn't a change of plan on his part-it was a continuation. his style is different, the policies remain the same.
did you notice the democratic party reaffirming israel being our ally, and them going on record about jerusalem being their capital. that hasn't even been part of our official policy. another step further. saying we are 'resetting' relations with russia is a far cry from actually doing so, and at least the current admin didn't say something as ridiculously stupid as bush did when he said he 'saw in putins eyes' that he was a good guy. now, that's a stroke of naivete if i ever saw one.
we haven't fought to win in afganistan since entering that stupid war. remember, the one war expanding to two, with much of the focus being placed on iraq, where we should never have gone? and had we not gone there, you wouldn't be having the bs with iran that you have-which is exactly why bush one didn't push into iraq back with the first gulf war. and had we not invaded iraq, the focus would have remained solely on afganistan from the start. we went in with guns blazing, completely ignoring history in afganistan, and the fact that a 'war' on terror isn't exactly going to be conventionally fought...and knowing the track records for countries invading that wasteland, it would turn out a waste anyway.
and you're right, nothing has changed. which was my point. we're still involved in the morass bush started in afganistan. we're still seeing problems that came from us going into iraq. meanwhile, everything else is pretty much status quo, except maybe with egypt-and that's probably balanced by libya.


and it's not obama's 'story' that the film was the cause of the attacks. it's the cause of the protests. the attack was pre-planned, and took place when they felt an opportune moment came.
and i guess you've ignored all the people in those countries who are standing up for us, and are ashamed of what's occurred? but then, if you did, it wouldn't help your whole 'obama sucks' argument.

How can you just not laugh at these ****ing idiots and basically ignore their entire argument. How can you be for continuing these unjust wars and for entering new ones and also be against the spiraling debt? They are for the cause yet against the effect. In their mind they get to blame in either case. In reality they just look like the ****ing idiots that they are. Call them on it and they will completely spin in a different directions like cutting the size of the government which is needed but won't even come close to covering the cost of the existing and new wars. Their circular argument is more like a circle jerk with the same result, getting them off on blamin Obama for either of the results. I was going to write in Ron Paul as his views align with my own. After reading all this **** being spewed here I am now voting for Obama to cancel out a vote for Romney.

geeker2 09-16-2012 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 890336)
....... I am now voting for Obama to cancel out a vote for Romney.

jms and zig don't be passive supporters - help support your guy! ;)

http://www.yardsaleforobama.com/

jms62 09-16-2012 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2 (Post 890346)
jms and zig don't be passive supporters - help support your guy! ;)

http://www.yardsaleforobama.com/

Are you 10? When you contribute something ANYFUKING thing of substance to any thread I will treat you with the respect you deserve which at this point is none.

Danzig 09-16-2012 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 890336)
How can you just not laugh at these ****ing idiots and basically ignore their entire argument. How can you be for continuing these unjust wars and for entering new ones and also be against the spiraling debt? They are for the cause yet against the effect. In their mind they get to blame in either case. In reality they just look like the ****ing idiots that they are. Call them on it and they will completely spin in a different directions like cutting the size of the government which is needed but won't even come close to covering the cost of the existing and new wars. Their circular argument is more like a circle jerk with the same result, getting them off on blamin Obama for either of the results. I was going to write in Ron Paul as his views align with my own. After reading all this **** being spewed here I am now voting for Obama to cancel out a vote for Romney.

yeah, i know it.
imo there is a complete lack of logic in many of the posts here. there's emotion, but not much actual thought.
if people are angry about the deficit, why would you vote for someone who wishes to grow defense?
if you are worried about taxes, why would you vote for someone whose primary tax plan is to cut taxes for the richest? you know, the ones paying less taxes than ever, and yet there's no correlating job growth?
if you are concerned about medicare, why would you vote for someone who advocates a voucher system?
if you're concerned about foreign affairs, why would you vote for someone who hasn't got a clue about foreign affairs?
if you're concerned about our standing in the world, why would you vote for someone who rushes to a press release without having the full story? how does that connote good leadership? i've heard of strike while the iron is hot, but the fire hadn't even been lit yet.
if you're unhappy with how banking completely effed up the economy, why would you vote for the guy who wants to remove regulations on banks?
if the republican party couldn't find someone better than that idiot, it doesn't say much for the future of the gop.

Danzig 09-16-2012 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2 (Post 890346)
jms and zig don't be passive supporters - help support your guy! ;)

http://www.yardsaleforobama.com/

yeah, he's not my guy. i think i'm going to do a write in for ron paul.

jms62 09-16-2012 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 890355)
yeah, he's not my guy. i think i'm going to do a write in for ron paul.

Don't waste it. Vote for the guy out of the 2 you dislike least otherwise the one you dislike most may win.

Danzig 09-16-2012 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 890357)
Don't waste it. Vote for the guy out of the 2 you dislike least otherwise the one you dislike most may win.

yeah, i don't view it as a waste, even tho a vote for paul won't do much overall. and it seems that romney will win arkansas, which is amazing to me. this state is still primarily democratic, but they can't stand obama. hillary would carry the state tho, had she gotten the nomination.

jms62 09-16-2012 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 890359)
yeah, i don't view it as a waste, even tho a vote for paul won't do much overall. and it seems that romney will win arkansas, which is amazing to me. this state is still primarily democratic, but they can't stand obama. hillary would carry the state tho, had she gotten the nomination.

I thought about this a bit more and realize that my anybody but Romney is as narrow minded as the anti Obama clowns. I am going to listen to how Romney is going increase jobs, reduce out sourcing and the destruction of the middle class. If I think it is workable i will vote for him. Cutting taxes on the "job creators" and business assuming they will create quality jobs is not a workable solution. I want to see punitive measures aginst the process. I want to see tariffs equal to what american companies pay. I want to see companies taxed heavily for shipping jobs out of the country. Policies of the 1970's no longer are viable.

geeker2 09-16-2012 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 890355)
yeah, he's not my guy. i think i'm going to do a write in for ron paul.

Zig...it was a joke

Danzig 09-16-2012 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 890367)
I thought about this a bit more and realize that my anybody but Romney is as narrow minded as the anti Obama clowns. I am going to listen to how Romney is going increase jobs, reduce out sourcing and the destruction of the middle class. If I think it is workable i will vote for him. Cutting taxes on the "job creators" and business assuming they will create quality jobs is not a workable solution. I want to see punitive measures aginst the process. I want to see tariffs equal to what american companies pay. I want to see companies taxed heavily for shipping jobs out of the country. Policies of the 1970's no longer are viable.

that's the thing; i have listened to what he has to say. if you look back thru my posts, not long ago i said i hadn't made up my mind. but after watching, listening, reading, i can say i don't see anything about romney's plans that i like. i don't care for the direction we've taken in the last few years, but i don't see mitt being an improvement. there's just too much in this plans that i think would be worse than what we have now.
i don't like his take on defense, taxes, banking regs, foreign policy, domestic policy, civil rights policy....i honestly can't think of one thing right now that he's said that i like. his campaign seems to be predicated on 'obama sucks'. but it is becoming clearer to me as things progess that he sucks worse.

Danzig 09-16-2012 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geeker2 (Post 890372)
Zig...it was a joke

:D i figured; no worries!

Thepaindispenser 09-16-2012 02:42 PM

Nobody in their right mind goes from voting for Ron Paul to Obama as you couldn't find two more opposite candidates so you aren't fooling anyone JMS. Apparently you aren't too bright either as I wasn't endorsing our previous foreign policy, I was just merely pointing out the differences which are clear. Maybe you should try a reading comprehension class.

I would like to see Ron Paul as President but I am a grown up instead of a whining little baby and realize it isn't going to happen this year.

Obama is the biggest threat to our liberties since FDR, plus he is completely incompetent in managing the economy and in foreign policies. He has to go or we will really regret it.

jMS go ahead and vote for Obama as you are just as big of a fraud as him.

Danzig I was against the Iraq war from the beginning but at least Bush went to Congress for approval I was also against the Libyan war and now look at the mess it has created. But since we were already in Iraq, a sensible pullout would be expected but Obama's pullout is solely for election purposes and that vacuum is being filled by Iran.

Danzig you are ok with drone attacks into another country where innocent people are indiscriminately killed? Something tells me that you wouldn't feel the same way if Bush was behind them.

Again I wasn't taking a stance on Israel, I was just merely pointing out differences in foreign policy. Please don't pretend for one second that Democrat party affirmed Jeresalem as the capital of Israel, even on the third vote the nays clearly drowned out the yeahs.

Coach Pants 09-16-2012 02:49 PM

You're a submissive p.ussy...not a grown up. Go waste your vote on a myth, douche.

Thepaindispenser 09-16-2012 05:14 PM

Hey Coach Jerkoff, who is almost as crazy and nasty as Riot, chimes in with his usual posts that are high on unoriginal insults and always lacking in substance. As usual, you didn't disappoint. Go back to the fantasy world in your head. It wouldn't shock me if Riot and you are on the same floor in Bellevue's wing for the highly delusional and deeply disturbed,

Thepaindispenser 09-16-2012 05:30 PM

It is a sad day in this country when Obama can dictate to the media that Romney and an American filmmaker are problem instead of the murdering Islamic terrorists and Obama. It is even sadder when people like Coach Jerkoff sit with their hands down their pants instead of speaking out against Obama's incompetence and his attempt to appease terrorists at the expense of an Ameican's right to free speech. Yeah Coach Jerkoff keep lying to yourself about there not being a difference between an Obama and Romney presidency.

Danzig 09-16-2012 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 890428)
Nobody in their right mind goes from voting for Ron Paul to Obama as you couldn't find two more opposite candidates so you aren't fooling anyone JMS. Apparently you aren't too bright either as I wasn't endorsing our previous foreign policy, I was just merely pointing out the differences which are clear. Maybe you should try a reading comprehension class.

I would like to see Ron Paul as President but I am a grown up instead of a whining little baby and realize it isn't going to happen this year.

Obama is the biggest threat to our liberties since FDR, plus he is completely incompetent in managing the economy and in foreign policies. He has to go or we will really regret it.

jMS go ahead and vote for Obama as you are just as big of a fraud as him.

Danzig I was against the Iraq war from the beginning but at least Bush went to Congress for approval I was also against the Libyan war and now look at the mess it has created. But since we were already in Iraq, a sensible pullout would be expected but Obama's pullout is solely for election purposes and that vacuum is being filled by Iran.

Danzig you are ok with drone attacks into another country where innocent people are indiscriminately killed? Something tells me that you wouldn't feel the same way if Bush was behind them.

Again I wasn't taking a stance on Israel, I was just merely pointing out differences in foreign policy. Please don't pretend for one second that Democrat party affirmed Jeresalem as the capital of Israel, even on the third vote the nays clearly drowned out the yeahs.

no, i'm not for the drone strikes. if i'm against troops on the ground, why would i be for those? and i am certainly against drone strikes against american citizens.

Danzig 09-16-2012 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thepaindispenser (Post 890472)
It is a sad day in this country when Obama can dictate to the media that Romney and an American filmmaker are problem instead of the murdering Islamic terrorists and Obama. It is even sadder when people like Coach Jerkoff sit with their hands down their pants instead of speaking out against Obama's incompetence and his attempt to appease terrorists at the expense of an Ameican's right to free speech. Yeah Coach Jerkoff keep lying to yourself about there not being a difference between an Obama and Romney presidency.

i gotta tell you, with posts like this being your mode of operation since day one, i don't picture a long posting career here.

GBBob 09-16-2012 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 890474)
i gotta tell you, with posts like this being your mode of operation since day one, i don't picture a long posting career here.

Two for one dart

GBBob 09-16-2012 06:01 PM

PD is my younger brother Tom and a very intelligent person and I can assure you he signed up on his own and expresses his own views and can handle debating you or anyone else on the issues facing our country today.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.