![]() |
NBA CHAMPIONSHIP: Who wins and in how many games
Heat in 6
|
Heat in 6. Maybe 7, but LEBRON GETS HIS FIRST RING FOR SURE.
|
Quote:
|
OKC in 5.
|
I'm betting the Heat in the series. I figure that'll be enough to mush Lebron.
|
Oklahoma City in 5.
|
OKC in 6
|
OKC in 5
|
Quote:
|
Miami plus 5.5 tonight 150$
Miami plus 155 in series $500 risk. Sportsinteraction.com |
Heat in 5
|
Quote:
|
Heat in 5.
|
OKC in 6
|
I guess Thunder in 7. I have no idea though.
|
Lets see if the Thunder can hold. Used a lot of energy to get the lead.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Looking at it in simpler terms OKC won despite Battier and Chalmers playing really well, Harden doing nothing, Ibaka having only 6 rebounds and no blocked shots, Miami making more 3 pointers with a better percentage and OKC's bench only having 19 points. OKC is just a better, deeper team with better, younger players. |
Basketball is just annoying to watch sometimes.
I saw a play where Westbrook sprints in front of Bosh, cuts him off, stops on a dime, and flops when Bosh can't stop in time and runs into the back of him. If you did stuff like that on a playground -- you would kill the fun of the game and people would want to fight you. But, in "real" basketball -- that's considered a very smart play...and Bosh's Ethiopian uncoordinated looking ass didn't even complain about the call...nor did the announcers think anything was wrong with the call. |
OKC does everything that the Heat do only faster and better. This is going to be ugly if Miami doesn't try to slow them down.
|
Quote:
|
Great quote from Dirk:
"He's way more of a 3-man than I ever was. He handles the ball way better on the break than I ever did. He's got deeper range. And he's doing all this at 23. He's won the scoring title three times in a row, so that he means he won the first one at 21. I barely got through my rookie year. When I was 21, Gary Trent was still killing me in practice." |
Great quote from Dirk. It might take two championships until the deranged give him proper credit. It's pretty obvious who the better player was last night.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can tell you one thing I saw for sure. Westbrook and Durant have no fear of taking an open jump shot, while Wade and ESPECIALLY Lebron wanted no parts of it in the 2nd half. Granted, Lebron's shots looked they were launched with an uncalibrated catapult, but still. |
Quote:
Westbrook and Harden. They are both better then Wade right now. I just thought Lebron could be that good. Not sure after last night. Unless Wade somehow plays like 6 years ago and Bosh does 10x more. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you have a clue (hello PG) as to what you are watching it is painfully obvious that OKC is a better team than Miami and what LeBron does or doesn't do cant change that. OKC is younger, healthier, stronger, faster and meshes far better than Miami. They came out a little tight and Miami was making shots that you knew wouldnt keep falling. OKC simply wore them down and in the end when Durant and Westbrook are hitting jumpers they are practically unstoppable. It has been that way pretty much all season and the fact that they are doing a better job of protecting the ball makes them that much better. I'm sure the refs/Stern will try to slow them down the next 2 games because they dont want a sweep but really how much better is Miami going to play? Offensively they scored 54 in the 1st half and got contributions from guys you wouldnt count on. Wade hasnt been good all year. Bosh is easily guarded by Ibaka especially if he is never going to go into the paint. Sure James may need to score 40 but unlike Boston and Indiana this is a team that can punch back. Defensively they are finding out that there is no real good answer to stopping OKC. Just like SA and the Lakers found out. I guess I could have summed that up by saying that OKC is just a better team. |
I thought that OKC and SA were both better than Miami and nothing I saw last night makes me think different. I think OKC wins pretty easily although I wouldn't be surprised to see Miami take game two or lose tomorrow and take two at home. Basketball changes quickly. Two games into the SA/OKC series, the Spurs had won 20 straight and people were comparing them to the best teams of the past 20 years and wondering if OKC could win a game. One game into the Miami/Boston series, it looked like a Miami sweep. After game five, Miami was lucky they weren't eliminated. Then they came back. OKC very easily could have been down 3-1 against LA after destroying them by 100 in game one.
|
Quote:
I hate to overreact to one game but the only way Miami wins a game is if OKC has a bad shooting night or the refs just absolutely give them the game. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
OKC is just a nightmare match up for MIA because MIA isn't deep and has no low post options like LA and SA. On defense OKC doesnt have to respect the bit players and can contest perimeter which last night wore down James and Wade. On offense they can play the pick and roll game, they can slash to the basket, they can draw doubles and hit open jumpers, they want to get the ball in the open court and they play a normal rotation. You can stop Durant simply by doubling him out by the 3 point line but that opens the court for Westbrook/Harden to to to the hoop or take the open jumper, Ibaka/Collison can roll hard against a mismatch if the heat double with a big man. What is amazing is that OKC can have so many offensive looks and options despite having one of the worst offensive players in the NBA as a starter. Like I said I hate to overrate one game but Miami is in real trouble unless OKC implodes. |
Quote:
|
Miami was impressive tonight. Good for Lebron knocking down those two free throws at the end.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Credit where credit is due. Lebron has been very good in this series. He's the second best player (to Durant) in the series, but he has been solid.
He hit the shots when it mattered, which is something he failed to do last year in the finals. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.