Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Battaglia's tentative pre-draw Derby ML (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46545)

Kasept 05-02-2012 10:24 AM

Battaglia's tentative pre-draw Derby ML
 
Mike Battaglia’s tentative morning line

Hansen (Maker/Dominguez)*10-1*

Daddy Long Legs (O’Brien/O’Donoghue)*30-1*

Union Rags (Matz/Leparoux)*9-2*

Dullahan (Romans/Desormeaux)*8-1*

Creative Cause (Harrington/Rosario)*12-1*

Gemologist (Pletcher/Castellano)*6-1*

Sabercat (Asmussen/Nakatani)*30-1*

Take Charge Indy (Byrne/Borel)*15-1*

Bodemeister (Baffert/Smith)*4-1*

I’ll Have Another (O’Neill/Gutierrez)*12-1*

Daddy Nose Best (Asmussen/Gomez)*15-1*

Liaison (Baffert/M. Garcia)*50-1*

Alpha (McLaughlin/Maragh)*15-1*

Prospective (Casse/Contreras)*30-1*

Trinniberg (Parboo/Martinez)*50-1*

Done Talking (Smith/Russell)*50-1*

Went the Day Well (Motion/Velazquez)*20-1*

Rousing Sermon (Hollendorfer/Lezcano)*50-1*

El Padrino (Pletcher/Bejarano)*20-1*

Optimizer (Lukas/Court)*50-1*

Coach Pants 05-02-2012 10:28 AM

Jon White had Hansen at 12-1. I can't see him being higher than 8-1.

alysheba4 05-02-2012 10:42 AM

creative cause at 12-1 would be nice.

Travis Stone 05-02-2012 10:54 AM

I can't say I would disagree with much. It's a hard line to make, especially this year.

-BT- 05-02-2012 11:01 AM

[quote=Kasept;857370]Mike Battaglia’s tentative morning line


Dullahan (Romans/Desormeaux)*8-1*
QUOTE]


so much for value there :rolleyes:

-bt-

jms62 05-02-2012 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alysheba4 (Post 857380)
creative cause at 12-1 would be nice.

Why becuase it would be a massive underlay and create value elsewhere?

HaloWishingwell 05-02-2012 11:07 AM

Take Charge Lady won't be 15-1

parsixfarms 05-02-2012 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HaloWishingwell (Post 857400)
Take Charge Lady won't be 15-1

He should be, but I agree that he won't (because of Borel).

ranger5830 05-02-2012 11:14 AM

I know it's a thankless job, but I don't know how he could have 6 horses at 50-1 when last year not a single horse was higher than 40-1. Also, the favorites seem too short, maybe put Bodemeister at 9-2 or 5, UR at 6 and adjust the longshots down accordingly.

FATPIANO 05-02-2012 11:43 AM

I'll take 6-1 on Gemologist

Travis Stone 05-02-2012 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ranger5830 (Post 857404)
I know it's a thankless job, but I don't know how he could have 6 horses at 50-1 when last year not a single horse was higher than 40-1. Also, the favorites seem too short, maybe put Bodemeister at 9-2 or 5, UR at 6 and adjust the longshots down accordingly.

I think this is a year where we return to realistic odds on the longshots... but then again, who knows... the volume in the pool is so large.

Making a horse 30-1 instead of 50-1 starts to really increase odds on some of the lower horses, which is tough to do this year.

justindew 05-02-2012 12:06 PM

I don't think there is a chance in hell that either Bodemeister or Union Rags will be under 5-1. I'd say even 6-1 would be low. Lookin' At Lucky was over 6-1 as the favorite. And only two others were under 10-1 that year (Super Saver and Sidney's Candy).

slotdirt 05-02-2012 12:22 PM

Hard to envision we'll have a Big Brown (2-1) or even a Friesan Fire (3.8-1?!?!?!?!? - sorry, had to throw that in there for laughs) in the 2012 Derby.

3kings 05-02-2012 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justindew (Post 857425)
I don't think there is a chance in hell that either Bodemeister or Union Rags will be under 5-1. I'd say even 6-1 would be low. Lookin' At Lucky was over 6-1 as the favorite. And only two others were under 10-1 that year (Super Saver and Sidney's Candy).

6-1 because he drew the rail. He would have been 4-1 or less in the 5-20 posts.

PatCummings 05-02-2012 01:04 PM

Unless you are only betting in the win pool, the odds are meaningless for assessing legitimate value. I think you get some much more realistic value on the "longshots" in the exotics pool compared to the win pool, where a load of the novice money ends up going.

justindew 05-02-2012 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3kings (Post 857447)
6-1 because he drew the rail. He would have been 4-1 or less in the 5-20 posts.

Good point, but there were still only three horses under 10-1.

Antitrust32 05-02-2012 01:14 PM

I'm starting to really like Hanson.

OldDog 05-02-2012 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 857458)
I'm starting to really like Hanson.

At 10-1 or higher, me too.

Coach Pants 05-02-2012 01:24 PM

I prefer Nelson, but Hanson will do.

OldDog 05-02-2012 01:33 PM

I think you mean Nilsson.

pmayjr 05-02-2012 02:04 PM

Tough for me to believe you'll get over 10-1 on Hansen or Creative Cause, but I'd love it

Thunder Gulch 05-02-2012 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3kings (Post 857447)
6-1 because he drew the rail. He would have been 4-1 or less in the 5-20 posts.

I think he would have won if he drew 5-10

richard 05-02-2012 02:18 PM

The odds look right in the ball park.

hockey2315 05-02-2012 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pmayjr (Post 857478)
Tough for me to believe you'll get over 10-1 on Hansen or Creative Cause, but I'd love it

They can't all be under 10-1, and I'd be shocked if Hansen was one of the ones who was.

MaTH716 05-02-2012 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockey2315 (Post 857491)
They can't all be under 10-1, and I'd be shocked if Hansen was one of the ones who was.

I think he will be under 10-1. I really feel like he's going to take a ton of money from the once a year bettors who like him because he's a pretty horsey. Not to mention, the continous clips that NBC will be showing of him winning the BC on the same track.

hockey2315 05-02-2012 02:41 PM

I guess that could be a factor. . . Just seems like very few actual handicappers (myself include) like him.

Someone out of the shorter prices is going to get lost on the board this year. . . maybe Dullahan?

Calzone Lord 05-02-2012 02:46 PM

I've heard stories of really old people throwing vacuum salesmen out of their house because the product they were trying to sell shared a name with Herbert Hoover.

For 30-year-old people, Hansen is to music what Herbert Hoover is to presidents for 90-year-old geezers.

dagolfer33 05-02-2012 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants (Post 857469)
I prefer Nelson, but Hanson will do.

I'd prefer Bond over either one. They are pretty hot.

lemoncrush 05-02-2012 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dagolfer33 (Post 857498)
I'd prefer Bond over either one. They are pretty hot.

I'm not going to be an apologist for the music group Hanson, but it's been like...18 years since they've released that MMMbop song. Now in their late 20's, they're more like a cross between Cheap Trick and Crosby Stills and Nash, than the Backstreet Boys.

In addition to owning their own record label, they write, record and perform all their own music and still sell a sh*tload of CDs around the world. I realize it's not everyones cup of tea, but those guys are actually pretty talented.

Coach Pants 05-02-2012 03:27 PM

Once NBC shows the video of Hansen playing in the sand it's over. 7-1 tops.

Antitrust32 05-02-2012 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemoncrush (Post 857512)
I'm not going to be an apologist for the music group Hanson, but it's been like...18 years since they've released that MMMbop song. Now in their late 20's, they're more like a cross between Cheap Trick and Crosby Stills and Nash, than the Backstreet Boys.

In addition to owning their own record label, they write, record and perform all their own music and still sell a sh*tload of CDs around the world. I realize it's not everyones cup of tea, but those guys are actually pretty talented.

i had no idea they were still in the music business after mmmm bop dupadobop

lemoncrush 05-02-2012 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 857521)
i had no idea they were still in the music business after mmmm bop dupadobop

you guys are killing me. All i'm saying is that if you went into a bar and saw them play, you wouldn't think they were a boy band.

DERBY DRAW (the most unriveting 30 minutes in TV) is streaming here.

http://content.usatoday.com/communit...1#.T6GgYr_PwY4

Mike 05-02-2012 04:07 PM

These two (on the video stream) are pretty boring. Not their fault I guess, someone needs to pan the camera around the room while they talk.

3kings 05-02-2012 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemoncrush (Post 857512)
I'm not going to be an apologist for the music group Hanson, but it's been like...18 years since they've released that MMMbop song. Now in their late 20's, they're more like a cross between Cheap Trick and Crosby Stills and Nash, than the Backstreet Boys.

In addition to owning their own record label, they write, record and perform all their own music and still sell a sh*tload of CDs around the world. I realize it's not everyones cup of tea, but those guys are actually pretty talented.

Those 3 guys from the movie Slapshot sing too, who knew.

Antitrust32 05-02-2012 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemoncrush (Post 857525)
you guys are killing me. All i'm saying is that if you went into a bar and saw them play, you wouldn't think they were a boy band.

DERBY DRAW (the most unriveting 30 minutes in TV) is streaming here.

http://content.usatoday.com/communit...1#.T6GgYr_PwY4

I love rock n roll. I'll have to check them out on youtube sometime.

philcski 05-02-2012 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 857458)
I'm starting to really like Hanson.

Which one?

I always liked #17.

jms62 05-03-2012 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hockey2315 (Post 857494)
I guess that could be a factor. . . Just seems like very few actual handicappers (myself include) like him.

Someone out of the shorter prices is going to get lost on the board this year. . . maybe Dullahan?

Why because races run exactly like they project on paper and jocks and trainers are too stupid to train for and deviate from historical strategy when faced with a scenario they couldnt possibly be successful at based upon the current conditions being presented? "very few actual handicappers (myself included)" geesh do you talk down to people much?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.