Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Graded Stakes Committee Makes Changes (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44693)

NTamm1215 12-01-2011 04:57 PM

Graded Stakes Committee Makes Changes
 
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...takes-for-2012

Four new Grade Is including the Breeders' Cup Juvenile Fillies Turf and Turf Sprint.

NYRA loses two Grade Is, the Hopeful and Ruffian.

3kings 12-01-2011 05:09 PM

Good news for Parx.

freddymo 12-01-2011 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215 (Post 821295)
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...takes-for-2012

Four new Grade Is including the Breeders' Cup Juvenile Fillies Turf and Turf Sprint.

NYRA loses two Grade Is, the Hopeful and Ruffian.

The Marvin is like a Grade 2+++++..Arguable the best G3 in America.. If you made the Marvin a G1 there woud be 20 in the box for 250k in a minute

DaTruth 12-01-2011 05:48 PM

I feel better knowing that the Blue Grass remains a Grade 1.

freddymo 12-01-2011 05:54 PM

How the F is the BEST 2 year old race ....The Hopeful not a G! at SPA

slotdirt 12-01-2011 06:06 PM

Charles Town Classic!

Cannon Shell 12-01-2011 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo (Post 821301)
The Marvin is like a Grade 2+++++..Arguable the best G3 in America.. If you made the Marvin a G1 there woud be 20 in the box for 250k in a minute

Actually this will probably reduce the race to a 5 horse field.

Cannon Shell 12-01-2011 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo (Post 821304)
How the F is the BEST 2 year old race ....The Hopeful not a G! at SPA

Everyone knows there is no good 2 year old racing at Saratoga...

freddymo 12-01-2011 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 821310)
Everyone knows there is no good 2 year old racing at Saratoga...

Yep we need to promote Keeneland and their SPECIAL horse healthy racing surface.. Shameful simply shameful ..Its the Hopeful for Christ sake..The winners of the Hopeful line the Hall of Fame..THE FN BREEDERS CUP JUVY SPRINTS ?

rgustafson 12-01-2011 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freddymo (Post 821316)
Yep we need to promote Keeneland and their SPECIAL horse healthy racing surface.. Shameful simply shameful ..Its the Hopeful for Christ sake..The winners of the Hopeful line the Hall of Fame..THE FN BREEDERS CUP JUVY SPRINTS ?

Not saying that I disagree with your rant about the Hopeful downgrade, but the Graded Stakes committe uses certain criteria to make their recommendations and evidentally felt that recent runnings did not measure up. Your other comments are somewhat misconstrued. The Keeneland upgrade, the Jenny wiley is on the turf so no promotion of their SPECIAL surface there, though I understand your comment pertains to leaving the Blue Grass a Grade I. As far as the Breeders Cup races that were upgraded they were the Juvenile Fillies Turf( not a sprint) and the Turf Sprint for older males, 3& up. I thimk that you would agree that it has pretty much been a foregone conclusion that once a Breeders Cup race has been run enough times a Grade I status is awarded( the exception being the Marathon which is an ill concieved joke of a race and hopefully will not be continued)

NTamm1215 12-01-2011 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgustafson (Post 821325)
Not saying that I disagree with your rant about the Hopeful downgrade, but the Graded Stakes committe uses certain criteria to make their recommendations and evidentally felt that recent runnings did not measure up. Your other comments are somewhat misconstrued. The Keeneland upgrade, the Jenny wiley is on the turf so no promotion of their SPECIAL surface there, though I understand your comment pertains to leaving the Blue Grass a Grade I. As far as the Breeders Cup races that were upgraded they were the Juvenile Fillies Turf( not a sprint) and the Turf Sprint for older males, 3& up. I thimk that you would agree that it has pretty much been a foregone conclusion that once a Breeders Cup race has been run enough times a Grade I status is awarded( the exception being the Marathon which is an ill concieved joke of a race and hopefully will not be continued)

The 2009 and 2010 runnings of the Hopeful were by no means spectacular but did feature 1-2-3 finishers that subsequently won the Gotham, Jim Dandy, Travers, Commonwealth, and Churchill Downs.

The 2010 Ruffian was won by a G2 winner who came back to place in a G2. The runner-up came back to win the BC Distaff. The year before the 2nd place finisher was a G1 winner and the winner was exiting a 2nd place finish in a G1.

Neither of these two races deserved to be downgraded. The Jenny Wiley and Cotillion were races that deserved to be upgraded.

outofthebox 12-02-2011 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaTruth (Post 821302)
I feel better knowing that the Blue Grass remains a Grade 1.

Really? I mean the last 5 winners of the race have a total of 3 wins after their victory. Only Brilliant Speed won a graded race (3) . Stately Victor the non graded Ontario Derby. Dominican a allowance race at Presque Isle. General Quarters a few close calls but no wins. Anyone remember Monba? Da Truth i know you were tongue n cheek on your quote...

VOL JACK 12-02-2011 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by outofthebox (Post 821360)
Really? I mean the last 5 winners of the race have a total of 3 wins after their victory. Only Brilliant Speed won a graded race (3) . Stately Victor the non graded Ontario Derby. Dominican a allowance race at Presque Isle. General Quarters a few close calls but no wins. Anyone remember Monba? Da Truth i know you were tongue n cheek on your quote...

General Quarters followed his Bluegrass with a G1 win in the Woodford Reserve at CD on Derby Day 2010.

VOL JACK 12-02-2011 08:38 AM

The real problem with the Graded Stakes, is the absurd amount of Grade 1's on the island known as California.
Unless you consider all the rags Zenyatta beat worth of Grade 1 placing's.

3kings 12-02-2011 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VOL JACK (Post 821377)
The real problem with the Graded Stakes, is the absurd amount of Grade 1's on the island known as California.
Unless you consider all the rags Zenyatta beat worth of Grade 1 placing's.

I agree. You would think many CA races will be in for downgrading in the next year or two.

blackthroatedwind 12-02-2011 09:51 AM

What is the justification for making the BC Juvie Fillies Turf a Grade 1 ( other than allowing them to justify keeping it's biggest prep, the Alcibiades, as a Grade 1 )?

How is the Spinster still a Grade 1?

cmorioles 12-02-2011 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 821388)
What is the justification for making the BC Juvie Fillies Turf a Grade 1 ( other than allowing them to justify keeping it's biggest prep, the Alcibiades, as a Grade 1 )?

How is the Spinster still a Grade 1?

Ditto the Blue Grass.

cmorioles 12-02-2011 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgustafson (Post 821325)
I thimk that you would agree that it has pretty much been a foregone conclusion that once a Breeders Cup race has been run enough times a Grade I status is awarded( the exception being the Marathon which is an ill concieved joke of a race and hopefully will not be continued)

Isn't the Turf Sprint pretty much along the same lines, a joke?

Antitrust32 12-02-2011 10:26 AM

it's an absolute disgrace that the Hopeful is no longer a Grade 1. In my opinion it is a premier 2yo race right up there with the BC Juv.

Who the hell makes these kind of decisions?

Linny 12-02-2011 11:53 AM

The way 2yo's are campaigned nowadays, I understand the Hopeful downgrade. Most years of late it's been a glorified NW1x. In fact, I tend to think that the Euro's have it right in that only their major year end "destination" races for 2yo's have G1 status. I thus think that the Del Mar Futurity should also be downgraded. History can only go so far. Many of the "great races" won by the sports champions have vanished due to lack of ongoing interest or competition from other venues. Just ask Pimlico. The Special was once a must on the resumes of top older horses.

When the elite horses are scheduled to have 5 and 6 race campaigns the sport simply cannot support the number of G1's it once did.

I guss I get the BC upgrades, but in all honesty the turf sprint division remains very broad but not very deep. Maybe they want the spinoff 2yo grass fillies to have the same status as the colts but again we just really don't have a 2yo grass division so I think that this race is a nod to egt more Wuro partication from the highest ranks.

The Jenny Wiley has attracted good fields but I'm not sure it's really a G1 either.

I am surprised that the Gazelle didn't get chopped.

Danzig 12-02-2011 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 821388)
What is the justification for making the BC Juvie Fillies Turf a Grade 1 ( other than allowing them to justify keeping it's biggest prep, the Alcibiades, as a Grade 1 )?

How is the Spinster still a Grade 1?

probably trying to draw euros. no other justification for it comes to mind. about half of the bc races shouldn't be graded at all.

blackthroatedwind 12-02-2011 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 821434)
probably trying to draw euros. no other justification for it comes to mind. about half of the bc races shouldn't be graded at all.

Races can't be Graded in an attempt to attract horses.

rgustafson 12-02-2011 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmorioles (Post 821396)
Isn't the Turf Sprint pretty much along the same lines, a joke?

There has been such a large proliferation of this type of race in recent years, especially at some major venues (NYRA tracks in particular) that eventually some halfway decent horses find their way into these races. On the other hand, 1 3/4 miles on the dirt......um. not so much.:D

blackthroatedwind 12-02-2011 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rgustafson (Post 821442)
There has been such a large proliferation of this type of race in recent years, especially at some major venues (NYRA tracks in particular) that eventually some halfway decent horses find their way into these races. On the other hand, 1 3/4 miles on the dirt......um. not so much.:D

So " halfway decent horses " make up Grade 1 races now?

Cannon Shell 12-02-2011 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 821451)
So " halfway decent horses " make up Grade 1 races now?

Only the better Grade 1's

Cannon Shell 12-02-2011 01:51 PM

The graded stakes system is not only fairly useless in its present state but is harmful to the sport of horse racing by creating undeserved credentials for too many horses who use the graded blacktype as a justification to stop racing. A complete revamp of the system is badly needed but will never happen because the TOBA is a farce of an organization. They desperately fight against lasix (despite the fact that taking it away will lead to the devaluation of bloodstock accross the board) yet they adhere to this bloated system and wont drastically cut the number of graded events because they fear the effects it will have on the value of bloodstock (fewer graded blacktype horses, fewer credentialed mares, etc)

Assigning a "grade" to a race without knowing who is running in it is moronic. Assigning some sort of performance rates to stakes races after the season has concluded would not only be more accurate but would lead to increased competition and less ducking for fear of a year end downgrade. Had Zenyatta's connections had to choose between staying in CA and racing in races which would clearly be graded poorly due to the weak competition or racing in better races, well what do you think they might have done? Obviously classic races and certsin designated races could have some sort of special designation but far too many graded races are nothing more than allowance level races but for one or two horses.

Danzig 12-02-2011 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 821439)
Races can't be Graded in an attempt to attract horses.

it just seems that this is what they're attempting to do. i know most bc races were grade 1 right from the start. i don't know what else can explain it.

Danzig 12-02-2011 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 821454)
The graded stakes system is not only fairly useless in its present state but is harmful to the sport of horse racing by creating undeserved credentials for too many horses who use the graded blacktype as a justification to stop racing. A complete revamp of the system is badly needed but will never happen because the TOBA is a farce of an organization. They desperately fight against lasix (despite the fact that taking it away will lead to the devaluation of bloodstock accross the board) yet they adhere to this bloated system and wont drastically cut the number of graded events because they fear the effects it will have on the value of bloodstock (fewer graded blacktype horses, fewer credentialed mares, etc)

Assigning a "grade" to a race without knowing who is running in it is moronic. Assigning some sort of performance rates to stakes races after the season has concluded would not only be more accurate but would lead to increased competition and less ducking for fear of a year end downgrade. Had Zenyatta's connections had to choose between staying in CA and racing in races which would clearly be graded poorly due to the weak competition or racing in better races, well what do you think they might have done? Obviously classic races and certsin designated races could have some sort of special designation but far too many graded races are nothing more than allowance level races but for one or two horses.


:tro::$:

ateamstupid 12-02-2011 02:49 PM

Like most of the changes. :eek: @ the Hopeful being downgraded though.

Patrick333 12-02-2011 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3kings (Post 821296)
Good news for Parx.

It sure is. Good to see the Smarty Jones get graded.

RolloTomasi 12-02-2011 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny (Post 821430)
In fact, I tend to think that the Euro's have it right in that only their major year end "destination" races for 2yo's have G1 status.

France and Ireland hold their first Group 1 events for juveniles in August/September just as the US does.

Only Britain follows the pattern you describe, but inexplicably, it held its first two, the Dewhurst (7f) and Middle Park (6f), on the same day at the same racecourse this year. That cannot make any long term sense.

If the Juvenile Turf races are Grade 1 in order to attract top class Euro participation, then they have done poorly. For the most part, Coolmore and the like have sent nothing over but second string horses to take chunks of the $1 million purses back home. Not a single Group 1 winner has faced the starter in the 9 total runnings. I think only Pounced (who never started again) and Together were even placed in a Group 1 prior to the BC. And Lillie Langtry (injured in the 2009 running) might be the only horse to win a European Group 1 race in subsequent seasons.

That said, last year's renewal of the Juvenile Turf at the very least served as a good preview of the following year's crop of American turf 3yos. Despite Pluck's remarkable double misfire for any semblance of a campaign, and Soldat's modestly successful Derby trail on dirt, last year's race featured Willcox Inn, Banned, Humble And Hungry, and Air Support. Collectively, those 4 took down 9 stakes and placed in 8 others, the vast majority being graded stakes. Grade 2 status sounds about right.

rgustafson 12-02-2011 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 821451)
So " halfway decent horses " make up Grade 1 races now?

Yes, but only if they have been run for four consecutive years and only if they are part of the Breeders Cup program because after all this is racing's "Championship Day(s).":D

King Glorious 12-02-2011 04:55 PM

For the most part I agree with Cannon. The one problem I can see with grading races after the fact is you will have many different trainers and tracks claiming their horse or race is the star or marquee and the others are avoiding them. At least by grading them ahead of time, we all know which are supposed to be the biggest races and where the stars are supposed to be.

outofthebox 12-02-2011 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VOL JACK (Post 821375)
General Quarters followed his Bluegrass with a G1 win in the Woodford Reserve at CD on Derby Day 2010.

My bad. How could i forget the retired school teacher winning on Derby Day. Great story!

Cannon Shell 12-02-2011 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Glorious (Post 821495)
For the most part I agree with Cannon. The one problem I can see with grading races after the fact is you will have many different trainers and tracks claiming their horse or race is the star or marquee and the others are avoiding them. At least by grading them ahead of time, we all know which are supposed to be the biggest races and where the stars are supposed to be.

We should already know what races are supposed to be the biggest races and where the "stars" are supposed to be. End of the year evaluation encourages competition as opposed to the system currently in place. Grading of races was supposed to be for breeders to use to determine what black type races were of what class. Of course this was 40 years ago before information was readily available like it is now. The sad thing is that if you bring any of this up to members of the committee or most racetrack execs or breeders they look at you like you are crazy. Again there is zero sentiment to adjust the system because it is putting money in peoples pockts, gives tracks a marketing tool (though I am skeptical about anyone other than serious fans actually being swayed by a grade of a race-I'm sure Parx will not see a big spike in attendance for next years Cottillion) and gives the year end voters something that they can use regardless of how weak certain highly graded races were in a given year.

PatCummings 12-03-2011 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 821543)
(though I am skeptical about anyone other than serious fans actually being swayed by a grade of a race-I'm sure Parx will not see a big spike in attendance for next years Cottillion)

For what it's worth, which isn't much, I would be surprised if Parx didn't put the PA Derby and Cotillion on the same card now, plus the Turf Amazon and Gallant Bob...they have zero draw for the Cotillion in its current spot on the calendar and seem ready to have a big day when there isn't much else going on...so in that sense, if they run the Cotillion on PA Derby day, there will be a significant spike in attendance. Of course, the spike has everything to do with the race being moved to already a popular day attendance-wise, not because the Cotillion is a G1

Travis Stone 12-03-2011 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 821543)
We should already know what races are supposed to be the biggest races and where the "stars" are supposed to be. End of the year evaluation encourages competition as opposed to the system currently in place. Grading of races was supposed to be for breeders to use to determine what black type races were of what class. Of course this was 40 years ago before information was readily available like it is now. The sad thing is that if you bring any of this up to members of the committee or most racetrack execs or breeders they look at you like you are crazy. Again there is zero sentiment to adjust the system because it is putting money in peoples pockts, gives tracks a marketing tool (though I am skeptical about anyone other than serious fans actually being swayed by a grade of a race-I'm sure Parx will not see a big spike in attendance for next years Cottillion) and gives the year end voters something that they can use regardless of how weak certain highly graded races were in a given year.

The marketing appeal of a grade is virtually non-existent unless you can say you have a card with five G1's. Still debatable though.

Merlinsky 05-05-2012 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 821463)
Like most of the changes. :eek: @ the Hopeful being downgraded though.

I'll Have Another was 6th in the Hopeful last year. Hmm.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.