Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   casey anthony (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42935)

Danzig 07-03-2011 09:49 AM

casey anthony
 
closing arguments today.


guilty or not guily?

somerfrost 07-03-2011 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 788586)
closing arguments today.


guilty or not guily?

Sad case, my prayers go out to the little girl who's life ended so tragically, I have no opinion on Casey's guilt or innocence, have seen recaps of testimony but that hardly put me in a position to judge...soon we will know the jury's decision.

keithting 07-03-2011 11:18 AM

If you're asking - what will the jury's decision be - who can predict?

She's obviously guilty of something pretty significant - when she doesn't call police for 31 days.... and lies about everything....If it was an accident, why not call police immediately???

A case this complicated... when many experts are not agreeing on the facts versus circumstantial evidence...how will the jury react?

While I believe that she is guilty of murder one, in the end, I believe that she will be not be given the death penalty since the entire Anthony family obviously have some psychological issues....

clyde 07-03-2011 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 788586)
closing arguments today.


guilty or not guily?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtNHuqHWefU

lord007 07-03-2011 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clyde (Post 788601)

:tro:

clyde 07-03-2011 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lord007 (Post 788614)
:tro:

:tro:

Stickhorse 07-04-2011 03:52 PM

Sad, sad but so to is so much focus on this circus.

Just found out this has been covered from gavel to gavel via cable. C'mon society tune in to ATR it'll do you a lot more good!

bigrun 07-05-2011 01:25 PM

:mad:


Casey-----NOT GUILTY OF MURDER....WTF....was that the OJ jury...

GUILTY of providing false info..to everyone.....slap on the hand....

jms62 07-05-2011 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigrun (Post 788904)
:mad:


Casey-----NOT GUILTY OF MURDER....WTF....was that the OJ jury...

GUILTY of providing false info..to everyone.....slap on the hand....

Stupid ****ing people in this country...

somerfrost 07-05-2011 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jms62 (Post 788906)
Stupid ****ing people in this country...

That's why this is the greatest nation on earth, because we don't convict if there is reasonable doubt...all the haters can cry all they want, the jury looked at the evidence and said, "NO"...end of story! We don't send a young woman to her death because we THINK she's guilty, because in our opinion she acts guilty, we have a higher standard than that...thank god we do!

randallscott35 07-05-2011 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 788908)
That's why this is the greatest nation on earth, because we don't convict if there is reasonable doubt...all the haters can cry all they want, the jury looked at the evidence and said, "NO"...end of story! We don't send a young woman to her death because we THINK she's guilty, because in our opinion she acts guilty, we have a higher standard than that...thank god we do!

Yeah Thank God a ridiculous defense duped a group of idiots in Florida. Bravo

bigrun 07-05-2011 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 788909)
Yeah Thank God a ridiculous defense duped a group of idiots in Florida. Bravo


Jackasz D.A. laughing at the defense summation really helped a lot.....for the defense....guy should be disbarred.......

somerfrost 07-05-2011 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 788909)
Yeah Thank God a ridiculous defense duped a group of idiots in Florida. Bravo

As her lead counsel stated in his close...this case is where reasonable doubt lives! Easy to be critical when it's not you holding the very life of a young woman in your hands, the prosecution was arrogant in court and fell short of providing proof...if you feel someone is to blame, I'd start there!

Antitrust32 07-05-2011 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 788908)
That's why this is the greatest nation on earth, because we don't convict if there is reasonable doubt...all the haters can cry all they want, the jury looked at the evidence and said, "NO"...end of story! We don't send a young woman to her death because we THINK she's guilty, because in our opinion she acts guilty, we have a higher standard than that...thank god we do!

yes, great place where people like OJ and Casey can take lives and then live free.

of course she did it. no one else could have. She just got lucky that the body wasnt found until it was fully decomposed so they couldnt rule on the matter of death. she got lucky that she dumped the being she gave birth to in the woods so she wasnt found for 6 months.

yeah :rolleyes: this is what makes America wonderful, huh?


here's hoping she becomes an addict and gets HIV. that's the only appropriate karma I can think of. Instead she'll write a book and make millions... for murder.

Antitrust32 07-05-2011 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigrun (Post 788911)
Jackasz D.A. laughing at the defense summation really helped a lot.....for the defense....guy should be disbarred.......

that was ridiculous. I agree. You shouldnt be allowed to be a D.A. if you are going to pull that kind of crap.

Antitrust32 07-05-2011 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 788912)
As her lead counsel stated in his close...this case is where reasonable doubt lives! Easy to be critical when it's not you holding the very life of a young woman in your hands, the prosecution was arrogant in court and fell short of providing proof...if you feel someone is to blame, I'd start there!

no thanks, I'll blame the bitch who killed her kid and dumped her in the woods in a trash bag.

this is a travesty. the defense was allowed to make up anything they wanted to, based off no evidence, and it worked for them. you shouldnt be allowed to blatenly lie in court. and I hope Cindy gets charged with lying.

bigrun 07-05-2011 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 788917)
no thanks, I'll blame the bitch who killed her kid and dumped her in the woods in a trash bag.

this is a travesty. the defense was allowed to make up anything they wanted to, based off no evidence, and it worked for them. you shouldnt be allowed to blatenly lie in court. and I hope Cindy gets charged with lying.


The defense doesn't have to prove anything....just throw sh'it against the wall and hope something sticks in the minds of jurors....

dagolfer33 07-05-2011 02:39 PM

Now everyone in America knows how to handle the situation of unwanted children. How to cover it up, what to do with body, how to lie to the police, and the sum of it all...... How to get away with it.

Dahoss 07-05-2011 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 788591)
but that hardly put me in a position to judge..

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 788908)
That's why this is the greatest nation on earth, because we don't convict if there is reasonable doubt...all the haters can cry all they want, the jury looked at the evidence and said, "NO"...end of story! We don't send a young woman to her death because we THINK she's guilty, because in our opinion she acts guilty, we have a higher standard than that...thank god we do!

At least you aren't judging.

Let's be honest, you've probably pulled your pud a few times to Casey, while imagining she's a vampire or something so you're going to go off on your lecture crusade now.

Phuck off creep.

Danzig 07-05-2011 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigrun (Post 788911)
Jackasz D.A. laughing at the defense summation really helped a lot.....for the defense....guy should be disbarred.......

their only 'defense' was the child drowned, and that the accidental death was made to look like a homicide. what kind of bs defense is that? and then the judge ruled they couldn't even mention it in closing, as it wasn't even close to being proven.

the woman lied from beginning to end-and now she walks. horrendous.

alysheba4 07-05-2011 04:02 PM

an all time low:(

Antitrust32 07-05-2011 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alysheba4 (Post 788938)
an all time low:(

sad day for all.. unless you are Casey or Somer of course.

somerfrost 07-05-2011 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 788928)
At least you aren't judging.

Let's be honest, you've probably pulled your pud a few times to Casey, while imagining she's a vampire or something so you're going to go off on your lecture crusade now.

Phuck off creep.

Typical response from you...you disagree with me so you attack, you disagree with the verdict so more hatred....sorry to disappoint you but your opinion simply doesn't matter. I'm not going back and forth with you, perhaps you see yourself as the arbiter of all that's right in the world...enjoy.

keithting 07-05-2011 05:01 PM

A sad day for the U.S. justice system

But the good news is that that juror will make her cruise afterall (departing on the 7th).....

Dahoss 07-05-2011 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by somerfrost (Post 788945)
Typical response from you...you disagree with me so you attack, you disagree with the verdict so more hatred....sorry to disappoint you but your opinion simply doesn't matter. I'm not going back and forth with you, perhaps you see yourself as the arbiter of all that's right in the world...enjoy.

You're such a douche. You say you know nothing about the case, then applaud the result. Don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out why.

The funny thing is everything you project on me, is what makes you the douche that you are. Your opinion doesn't matter. You see yourself as the arbiter of what is right and wrong. You can't wait to hop on here and tell people how they should think, how they should react. No one cares about your lectures or your world views.

Like I said to you before....go back into your cave you creep.

Princess Doreen 07-05-2011 05:34 PM

I don't think this jury undestood the meaning of "reasonable doibt."

It would be hard to convict someone on a couple of examples of circumstantial evidence. But, in this case, they could throw out a 100 of the examples and still not be left with reasonable doubt.

I would submit that this jury was too tired and worn out serving on that sequestered jury for 6 weeks to spend the time to fully examine the evidence. They just wanted to put an end to it and took the quick and easy way out.

The distaff version of OJ. What a tragedy.

Danzig 07-05-2011 06:43 PM

i agree princess. unless you have 100 witnesses who all say the same thing, there will always be some 'reasonable' doubt.

its too bad that it ended like that. i am amazed. honest people with nothing whatsoever to hide don't make up a string of lies a mile long.
people have been convicted of murder without a body! this girl gets away with it, and they had the body. unbelievable.

keithting 07-05-2011 07:02 PM

I would so love for someone to name a thoroughbred "Casey Did It"".......

geeker2 07-05-2011 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keithting (Post 788968)
I would so love for someone to name a thoroughbred "Casey Did It"".......

or Bella Vita

declansharbor 07-05-2011 08:22 PM

I wish PackerBacker would invite BuffyFrost over to his trailer and a daisycutter just so happens to precisely fall into their arms as they hug each other.

Antitrust32 07-06-2011 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Princess Doreen (Post 788952)
I don't think this jury undestood the meaning of "reasonable doibt."

It would be hard to convict someone on a couple of examples of circumstantial evidence. But, in this case, they could throw out a 100 of the examples and still not be left with reasonable doubt.

I would submit that this jury was too tired and worn out serving on that sequestered jury for 6 weeks to spend the time to fully examine the evidence. They just wanted to put an end to it and took the quick and easy way out.

The distaff version of OJ. What a tragedy.

exactly.. i was listening to an interview of Juror 14 (2nd alternate). Asked about Casey partying for a month (it doesnt look good, but doesnt prove anything). they basically said not guilty because of three things: 1) no exact cause of death (because casey through the body in the woods and there were only bones left) 2) no time of death (also because of casey's doing) and 3) they didnt believe George, therefor giving credibility to Casey's ridiculous defense of drowning and molestation, neither of which were supported by a SHRED of real or circumstencial (sp?) evidence.

Basically, the jury rejected the circumstencial evidence, even though it overwhelmed them to a point where I couldnt see them letting her off. the jury was filled with by the book morons.

GenuineRisk 07-06-2011 09:05 AM

I confess, I didn't know anything about the trial until about two weeks ago, and then didn't follow it because the subject matter upset me too much, but the verdict doesn't mean she didn't do it; it means the prosecution didn't make their case. Cases built on circumstantial evidence, which this was, from what I gather, are very, very hard to prove, and it sounds like the prosecution, in their rush to bring this to trial, did a sh*tty job of it.

The onus of guilt must always be on the state to prove, not on the defendant to disprove. We give that up, in our rush to have a perpetrator to blame, then we might as well give up any notion that we believe in a free society.

And we can never underestimate the power of the media to shape the narrative we see, and clearly the media wanted the narrative to be that this woman did it. Again, I'm not saying she didn't; I didn't follow the case. But, and be honest with yourself, how many of us were absolutely sure that Gary Condit was involved in Chandra Levy's disappearance? Because that was the narrative the media wanted, and that's what they put forth, to the exclusion of any other possibilities.

Danzig 07-06-2011 09:25 AM

see, i don't see it as being like gary condit. he was a slimeball, but there was nothing tying him to her crime. no smelly car, no string of lies, etc.

now, the atlanta bombing and richard jewell...that was definitely a media frenzy, as was the duke rape case.

Antitrust32 07-06-2011 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig (Post 789031)
see, i don't see it as being like gary condit. he was a slimeball, but there was nothing tying him to her crime. no smelly car, no string of lies, etc.

now, the atlanta bombing and richard jewell...that was definitely a media frenzy, as was the duke rape case.

exactly, condit was purely speculation. this case was nothing like that.

it was a lot like the Peterson california murder case though.

Princess Doreen 07-06-2011 12:06 PM

A California jury convicting Scott Peterson was making up for what the OJ jury did. The Casey Anthony jury had far more CE than the Scott Peterson jury had.

Casey is saying that the first thing she wants to do when she gets out of prison is have another baby. I guess she wants to sucker her parents into supporting and taking care of another kid.

This gal is a sociopath - she'll not be able to overcome it, and she'll be even more vulnerable to trouble now because the predators will swoop down on her like a plague. Kharma will catch up with her... I'm hoping.

Bigsmc 07-06-2011 12:10 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 1778

clyde 07-06-2011 12:15 PM

I'm sorry to say this ( no I'm not!) , but everyone who has been vexing over this is a control freak.


A Black Wolf is going to eat you.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.