Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Sports Bar & Grill (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   The Red Sox Are Finished (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41737)

randallscott35 04-06-2011 09:23 PM

The Red Sox Are Finished
 
0-5 and just plain awful. Hope for Pats foots, all you have

clyde 04-06-2011 09:39 PM

Dahla picked them to win the world series.



Of course she will accuse me of being precociously judgmental based on just 5 games.

All of which they have lost.

Dahoss 04-06-2011 09:44 PM

I can't stand Boston or the Yankees, but there are 157 games left. They haven't even played a home game yet. If they win 2 of 3 from the Yanks this weekend they are right back in the thick of things.

hi_im_god 04-06-2011 09:55 PM

buy bosox.

randy's been selling equities for 2 years.

randallscott35 04-06-2011 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 766728)
buy bosox.

randy's been selling equities for 2 years.

I've been short nothing since '06 but continue your misleading charade on the day the dollar makes another low and gold makes another high. I truly believe you are inbred. Somewhere down the line. No doubt about it.

hi_im_god 04-06-2011 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 766733)
I've been short nothing since '06 but continue your misleading charade on the day the dollar makes another low and gold makes another high. I truly believe you are inbred. Somewhere down the line. No doubt about it.

it's not "moron" but i'll still take that as another positive sign for equities.

randallscott35 04-06-2011 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hi_im_god (Post 766734)
it's not "moron" but i'll still take that as another positive sign for equities.

Lets stay on topic. Red Sox. Don't thread pollute. Mods can fix this. If you need me to bump the initial econ thread where you embarrassed yourself, please ask. Otherwise post your nonsense in the stocks thread where it belongs.

Joey, cleanup aisle sportsbar.

hi_im_god 04-06-2011 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 766736)
Lets stay on topic. Red Sox. Don't thread pollute. Mods can fix this. If you need me to bump the initial econ thread where you embarrassed yourself, please ask. Otherwise post your nonsense in the stocks thread where it belongs.

Joey, cleanup aisle sportsbar.

i just took an easy shot, randy. you're the one keeping it alive.

randallscott35 04-07-2011 08:30 AM

Five games is an absurdly small sample size, the equivalent of the second quarter on opening week of an N.F.L. season. And seven of the eight playoff teams from last season lost five in a row at some point.

Then again, only one team in the wild-card era, the 1995 Cincinnati Reds, has reached the postseason after starting 0-5. No team has won the World Series after starting with so many losses.

dalakhani 04-07-2011 11:31 AM

This is a super talented team...certainly much more talented than any of the other teams that didn't make the playoffs that started 0-5. Carmona is pitching today so they may very well be 0-6. It will just fatten the line up if you want a future bet on them.

I will take all of the heat on this one (as a Red sox HATER) if they end up not making playoffs. I am confident that they will win the division by at least a couple of games.

slotdirt 04-07-2011 02:07 PM

0-162 is still in sight!

randallscott35 04-07-2011 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slotdirt (Post 766896)
0-162 is still in sight!

Yup. Teams are more than pieces. No gel.

slotdirt 04-07-2011 02:21 PM

I just think it's funny that Boston fans try to differentiate themselves from the Evil Empire when the rest of the world sees them as the Evil Empire-New England.

dalakhani 04-07-2011 04:47 PM

I always found that to be a bit comical with Sox fans. Somehow the Yankees "buy" championships but when they sign Manny or Pedro or Crawford or Gonzales, somehow they are "growing" their team the old fashioned way.

Make no mistake, the Sox buy their championships just like any other team.

clyde 04-07-2011 05:04 PM

Dahlakins....the mistake has aleady been made.





Just thayin'.

dalakhani 04-07-2011 05:40 PM

Who do you have Clyde?

clyde 04-07-2011 05:41 PM

Wouldn't you like to know.




;)..kissykissy

GBBob 04-07-2011 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by randallscott35 (Post 766899)
Yup. Teams are more than pieces. No gel.

Sounds like Gales about 365 days ago

lord007 04-07-2011 10:52 PM

Cmon now they are just getting started..lol...I am pretty heated though today's game was a disaster

Cannon Shell 04-08-2011 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 766940)
I always found that to be a bit comical with Sox fans. Somehow the Yankees "buy" championships but when they sign Manny or Pedro or Crawford or Gonzales, somehow they are "growing" their team the old fashioned way.

Make no mistake, the Sox buy their championships just like any other team.

Well not exactly. Did the Giant's "buy" their championship last year?

Boston has built their teams in the 2000's through shrewd moves with a few big money signings.

Pedro was acquired via trade
Gonzalez was acquired via trade
Beckett and Mike Lowell via trade
Pedroia was drafted by Boston
Youkilis was drafted by Boston
Ellsbury was drafted by Boston
Varitek was acquired via trade (along with Derrick Lowe)
Lester was drafted by Boston
Buchholz was drafted by Boston
Papelbon was drafted by Boston
Bard was drafted by Boston
Wakefield was signed by Boston for 175k as a FA after being released by the Pirates
Ortiz signed as a FA for 1.2 million after being released by the Twins
Lowrie drafted by Boston
Millar signed as FA for 2 million a year
Damon signed as FA for 7 million a year (same as previous year)
Schilling was acquired via trade
Foulke signed as FA for 3.5 million (or half of what he had made the previous year)
Arroyo was claimed off of waivers by Boston
Mueller was signed as a FA for 2.1 million (less than his previous 2 years salary with the Cubs)
Bellhorn was given to Boston for nothing by the Rockies
Crisp was acquired by trade
Okajima was signed as an Intl F for 1.2 million
Victor Martinez was acquired via trade

Boston's major FA signings "splurges"
Lugo was signed as a FA for 8 million (not exactly thier finest hour)
JD Drew was signed as a FA for 14 million
Manny was signed as a FA for avg 18 million
Daisuke was signed as an Int'l FA for 8.3 million (they did pay a huge posting fee)
Lackey was signed as a FA for avg 16 million a year
Beltre was a 1 year, 10 million FA signing that netted them a 1st round pick when he signed with Texas
Cameron signed as a FA for 7.5 million


These are the major players on the 2 WS winning teams and players since 2004. Do I really need to go through the Yankees for a comparison?

docicu3 04-08-2011 09:27 PM

These are the major players on the 2 WS winning teams and players since 2004. Do I really need to go through the Yankees for a comparison?[/quote]


Well yes.....if for no other reason that I think I would really enjoy the comparable dialogue.....

dalakhani 04-08-2011 09:32 PM

Calling half of those deals "trades" is laughable. If that is the case, can I call a rod a "trade acquisition"? How about Clemens? Knoblauch?

When a team like the padres "trades" a young stud 1st baseman for minor leaguers and stud subsequently signs 100 trillion dollar contract before he plays an inning, that is in essence a free agent signing. When a team that is about to become history "trades" the best young arm in baseball and said pitcher signs for a trillion dollars, that is in essence a free agent signing.

Yeah, schilling was a "trade". So was Pedro.:rolleyes:

We have already debated this. The yanks last world series was pretty sickening but let's not act like Boston's were homegrown. At least the yanks best players during their dynasty years were farm products. Boston can't even say that.

Cannon Shell 04-09-2011 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 767373)
Calling half of those deals "trades" is laughable. If that is the case, can I call a rod a "trade acquisition"? How about Clemens? Knoblauch?

When a team like the padres "trades" a young stud 1st baseman for minor leaguers and stud subsequently signs 100 trillion dollar contract before he plays an inning, that is in essence a free agent signing. When a team that is about to become history "trades" the best young arm in baseball and said pitcher signs for a trillion dollars, that is in essence a free agent signing.

Yeah, schilling was a "trade". So was Pedro.:rolleyes:

We have already debated this. The yanks last world series was pretty sickening but let's not act like Boston's were homegrown. At least the yanks best players during their dynasty years were farm products. Boston can't even say that.

Despite the overwhelmng evidence you refuse to admit you are wrong as usual.
SO the Red Sox forced these teams to deal with them? What above market deal did they do? Who signed for $250 million dollars?
They gave up Carl Pavano who when he was traded was the 9th ranked prospect in the game by Baseball America.
They gave up Hanley Ramirez for Beckett and Lowell.
They gave up 4 highly ranked prospects for Schilling including Astros current closer Brandon Lyon and 1st round pick Fossum. Schilling made 10 million in 03 with AZ, 12 million in 04 with Boston.
Everyone knew that SD wasn't going to resign with AZ. Do you think he wouldn't have found someone to meet his asking price if they had kept him as a FA? That Boston giving up 2 top prospects doesnt count?

That is the difference. Boston has signed good players to realistic contracts and let guys go at the right time and collected draft picks that they have used wisely. The fact they have the ability to trade top prospects to get players back is the difference. The Yankees for the most part just spend. Who is an important player that they have drafted in the 2000's? Besides Cano who is thier young homegrown talent?
And yeah you can call the Clemens deal a trade. They didn't exactly give him away considering David Wells and Lloyd were top players.

My point isnt that Boston doesn't have a high payroll compared to a lot of other teams but they are no where near the Yankees in throwing money at guys.

Cannon Shell 04-09-2011 08:38 AM

The Yankees have 126 million committed in payroll for 2013! Oh yeah that is for 8 players.

dalakhani 04-09-2011 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 767444)
Despite the overwhelmng evidence you refuse to admit you are wrong as usual.
SO the Red Sox forced these teams to deal with them? What above market deal did they do? Who signed for $250 million dollars?
They gave up Carl Pavano who when he was traded was the 9th ranked prospect in the game by Baseball America.
They gave up Hanley Ramirez for Beckett and Lowell.
They gave up 4 highly ranked prospects for Schilling including Astros current closer Brandon Lyon and 1st round pick Fossum. Schilling made 10 million in 03 with AZ, 12 million in 04 with Boston.
Everyone knew that SD wasn't going to resign with AZ. Do you think he wouldn't have found someone to meet his asking price if they had kept him as a FA? That Boston giving up 2 top prospects doesnt count?

That is the difference. Boston has signed good players to realistic contracts and let guys go at the right time and collected draft picks that they have used wisely. The fact they have the ability to trade top prospects to get players back is the difference. The Yankees for the most part just spend.
And yeah you can call the Clemens deal a trade. They didn't exactly give him away considering David Wells and Lloyd were top players.

My point isnt that Boston doesn't have a high payroll compared to a lot of other teams but they are no where near the Yankees in throwing money at guys.

LOL Daiseke was realistic? Have you lost your mind? They spent 100 million on a guy that is 30 and isn't going to be their fifth starter much longer. That's realistic?

JD Drew? 14 million a year for a guy that platoons?

Mike Lowell? They didn't want that contract but they took it at 9 million per to watch him rot on the bench for two years. How many teams can afford that? How did that "make sense"?

Julio Lugo?

Did Carl Crawford come over for FREE? How about that Gonzales trade? I bet you there are plenty of teams that can afford those moves. REALLY SHREWD ON THEO's PART. That 300 million is a "thrifty" 300 million. ;)

I did not compare the current Sox to the current Yankees. I compared the respective mini dynasties although I would be hard pressed to call what boston accomplished recently a dynasty. Of course, after going close to 90 years, 2 titles in a decade should be considered a dynasty. If the sox win this year, it was bought pure and simple.

Cannon Shell 04-09-2011 02:16 PM

So 9 million a year for a guy who hits .324 with 21 Hr and 121 RBI's and finishes 5th in the MVP voting the year you win a world Series is "bad value"?

So JD Drew didn't exactly work out as planned but him for 5 years and 70 million is hardly outrageous. Perhaps a 5 year deal for an injury prone player wasnt a great idea but 14 million a year for a player with his numbers isnt that far out of the realm especially considering he made 11.4 million his last season with the Dodgers. And JD Drew regularly has 550+ plate appearances, he is hardly a platoon player.

You want to judge Dice-K now but at the time the Red Sox were hardly the only ones bidding for him. Supposedly the Angels bid $45 million in a posting fee and would have given him a similar contract.

They did outbid the Angels for Crawford but they gave up 4 star prospects for Gonzalez. Do you think that the Cubs or Dodgers or Orioles weren't going to pay for Him after this seson? Boston beat them to the punch because they have stockpiled a ton of minor league talent and are able to use it just like they did when getting Beckett and Lowell.
They were able to turn a year of Adrian Beltre at 10 million a year (a deal you hated btw) and 2 good prospects for Gonzalez AND a number 1 draft pick. That isnt a good deal? Where did they OVERPAY?

I didn't want to do it because it is tedious but lets compare the Yankees...

Cannon Shell 04-09-2011 02:41 PM

A Rods contract 10 years 275 million (avg 27.5 million) Not much to say
CC-7 years 161 million (23 million) Completely overbid with 7 yr deal
Teixeria- 8 years 180 million (22.5) completely overbid with 8 year deal
Burnett -5 years 82million (16.5) LOL
Jeters latest 3 years 51 milion (17 million) Think he is worth it now?
Mo 2 years 30 million (15 million) deserves every penny
Posada 4 years 52 million (13 million) produces like a 2 million dollar player now
Soriano- 3 years 35 million (12 million) 12 million for a set up guy?

The Yankees Payrolls since 2004
2010: $213,359,389
2009: $201,449,189
2008: $209,081,577
2007: $189,639,045
2006: $194,663,079
2005: $208,306,817
2004: $184,193,950

The Red Sox Payroll since 2004
(Major League contracts plus pro-rated signing bonuses):
2010: $168,109,833
2009: $121,745,999
2008: $133,390,035
2007: $143,026,214
2006: $120,099,824
2005: $123,505,125
2004: $127,298,500

The Phillies payroll since 2004
2010: $138,178,379
2009: $113,004,046
2008: $ 98,269,880
2007: $ 89,428,213
2006: $ 88,273,333
2005: $ 95,522,000
2004: $ 93,219,167

The Mets payroll since 2004
2010: $126,498,096
2009: $149,373,987
2008: $137,793,376
2007: $115,231,663
2006: $101,084,963
2005: $101,305,821
2004: $ 96,660,970

The White Sox payroll since 2004
2010: $103,080,000
2009: $ 96,068,500
2008: $121,189,332
2007: $108,671,833
2006: $102,750,667
2005: $ 75,178,000
2004: $ 65,212,500

The Cubs payroll since 2004
2010: $144,359,000
2009: $134,809,000
2008: $118,345,833
2007: $ 99,670,332
2006: $ 94,424,499
2005: $ 87,032,933
2004: $ 90,560,00

The Tigers payroll since 2004
2010: $133,995,400
2009: $115,085,145
2008: $137,685,196
2007: $ 95,180,369
2006: $ 82,612,866
2005: $ 69,092,000
2004: $ 46,832,000

Cannon Shell 04-09-2011 02:53 PM

For a team that "buys" championships Boston sure hsn't signed a bunch of huge deals

The most lucrative contracts in baseball history, by total value:
1. Alex Rodriguez, $275,000,000 (2008-17) YANKEES
2. Alex Rodriguez, $252,000,000 (2001-10) RANGERS
3. Derek Jeter, $189,000,000 (2001-10) YANKEES
4. Joe Mauer, $184,000,000 (2011-18) TWINS
5. Mark Teixeira, $180,000,000 (2009-16) YANKEES
6. CC Sabathia, $161,000,000 (2009-15) YANKEES
7. Manny Ramirez, $160,000,000 (2001-08) RED SOX
8. Troy Tulowitzki, $157,750,000 (2011-20) ROCKIES
9. Miguel Cabrera, $152,300,000 (2008-15) TIGERS
10. Carl Crawford, $142,000,000 (2011-17) REDSOX
11. Todd Helton, $141,500,000 (2003-11) ROCKIES
12. Johan Santana, $137,500,000 (2008-13) METS
13. Alfonso Soriano, $136,000,000 (2007-14) CUBS
14. Vernon Wells, $126,000,000 (2008-14) BLUE JAYS
. . . Barry Zito, $126,000,000 (2007-13) GIANTS
. . . Jayson Werth, $126,000,000 (2011-17) NATS
17. Ryan Howard, $125,000,000 (2012-16) PHILS
18. Mike Hampton, $121,000,000 (2001-08) ROCKIES
19. Jason Giambi, $120,000,000 (2002-08) YANKEES
. . . Matt Holliday, $120,000,000 (2010-16) CARDINALS
. . . Cliff Lee, $120,000,000 (2011-15) RANGERS
22. Carlos Beltran, $119,000,000 (2005-11) METS
23. Ken Griffey Jr., $116,500,000 (2000-08) REDS
24. Kevin Brown, $105,000,000 (1999-2005) DODGERS
25. Carlos Lee, $100,000,000 (2007-12) ASTROS
. . . Albert Pujols, $100,000,000 (2004-10) CARDS
27. Carlos Zambrano, $91,500,000 (2008-12) CUBS
28. Mike Piazza, $91,000,000 (1999-2005) METS
. . . Barry Bonds, $90,000,000 (2002-06) GIANTS
. . . Torii Hunter, $90,000,000 (2008-12) ANGELS
. . . Chipper Jones, $90,000,000 (2001-06) BRAVES
. . . Scott Rolen, $90,000,000 (2003-10) PHILS
. . . Ichiro Suzuki, $90,000,000 (2008-12) MARINERS

There seems to be one team in particular with 4 of the top 6 contracts in history AND they wound up paying one of the other ones anyway.


Like I said Boston isn't cheap but since 2004 they have done more with way less money than the Yankees have. "Buying a championship"? The Marlins bought a title and disbanded the team twice. 2 years ago the Yankees spent close to 700 million to resign ARod then the next year bring in CC, Tex and Burnett. That would qualify.

Cannon Shell 04-09-2011 02:59 PM

When you look at it like this it is even more apparent...

Average annual value
The highest-paid players in baseball history, by average annual value:
1. Roger Clemens, $28,000,022 (2007) Yankees
2. Alex Rodriguez, $27,500,000 (2008-17) YAnkees
3. Alex Rodriguez, $25,200,000 (2001-10) TEx/Yankees
4. Ryan Howard, $25,000,000 (2012-16) Philly
5. Cliff Lee, $24,000,000 (2011-15) Philly
6. Joe Mauer, $23,000,000 (2011-18) Minn
. . . CC Sabathia, $23,000,000 (2009-15) Yankees
8. Johan Santana, $22,916,667 (2008-13)Mets
9. Manny Ramirez, $22,500,000 (2009-10) Dodgers
. . . Mark Teixeira, $22,500,000 (2009-16)Yankees
11. Roger Clemens, $22,000,022 (2006) Yankees
12. Carl Crawford, $20,285,714 (2011-17) Red Sox
13. Manny Ramirez, $20,000,000 (2001-08) Red Sox
. . . Roy Halladay, $20,000,000 (2011-13) Philly
15. Miguel Cabrera, $19,037,500 (2008-15) Tigers
16. Derek Jeter, $18,900,000 (2001-10) Yankees
17. Carlos Zambrano, $18,300,000 (2008-12) Cubs
18. Andruw Jones, $18,100,000 (2008-09) Dodgers
19. Barry Bonds, $18,000,000 (2002-06) Giants
. . . Roger Clemens, $18,000,000 (2005) Houston
. . . Ryan Howard, $18,000,000 (2009-11) Phily
. . . Torii Hunter, $18,000,000 (2008-12) Angels
. . . Sammy Sosa, $18,000,000 (2002-05)Cubs
. . . Ichiro Suzuki, $18,000,000 (2008-12) Mariners
. . . Vernon Wells, $18,000,000 (2008-14) Blue jays
. . . Jayson Werth, $18,000,000 (2007-14)Nats
. . . Barry Zito, $18,000,000 (2007-13) Giants
28. Jake Peavy, $17,333,333 (2010-12) White sox
29. Jason Giambi, $17,142,857 (2002-08) Yankees
. . . Matt Holliday, $17,142,857 (2010-16) CArds
31. Jeff Bagwell, $17,000,000 (2002-06) Astros
. . . Carlos Beltran, $17,000,000 (2005-11) Mets
. . . Carlos Delgado, $17,000,000 (2001-04) Mets
. . . Alfonso Soriano, $17,000,000 (2007-14 Cubs

dalakhani 04-09-2011 05:00 PM

Who is comparing anything to the yankees? You are making your own argument there...which is nothing new. The only comparison I drew was between the dynasties and the delusional sox nation.


My point is that the Red Sox spend a lot of money and buy their world series titles. You are trying to disprove this point by...comparing them to the f ucking yankees? LOL That would be like you saying that you are thin and comparing yourself to the butterbean.

Chuck- YOU ARE RIGHT. The Red Sox spend less money than the yankees.:tro:

dalakhani 04-09-2011 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 767543)
A Rods contract 10 years 275 million (avg 27.5 million) Not much to say
CC-7 years 161 million (23 million) Completely overbid with 7 yr deal
Teixeria- 8 years 180 million (22.5) completely overbid with 8 year deal
Burnett -5 years 82million (16.5) LOL
Jeters latest 3 years 51 milion (17 million) Think he is worth it now?
Mo 2 years 30 million (15 million) deserves every penny
Posada 4 years 52 million (13 million) produces like a 2 million dollar player now
Soriano- 3 years 35 million (12 million) 12 million for a set up guy?

The Yankees Payrolls since 2004
2010: $213,359,389
2009: $201,449,189
2008: $209,081,577
2007: $189,639,045
2006: $194,663,079
2005: $208,306,817
2004: $184,193,950

The Red Sox Payroll since 2004
(Major League contracts plus pro-rated signing bonuses):
2010: $168,109,833
2009: $121,745,999
2008: $133,390,035
2007: $143,026,214
2006: $120,099,824
2005: $123,505,125
2004: $127,298,500

The Phillies payroll since 2004
2010: $138,178,379
2009: $113,004,046
2008: $ 98,269,880
2007: $ 89,428,213
2006: $ 88,273,333
2005: $ 95,522,000
2004: $ 93,219,167

The Mets payroll since 2004
2010: $126,498,096
2009: $149,373,987
2008: $137,793,376
2007: $115,231,663
2006: $101,084,963
2005: $101,305,821
2004: $ 96,660,970

The White Sox payroll since 2004
2010: $103,080,000
2009: $ 96,068,500
2008: $121,189,332
2007: $108,671,833
2006: $102,750,667
2005: $ 75,178,000
2004: $ 65,212,500

The Cubs payroll since 2004
2010: $144,359,000
2009: $134,809,000
2008: $118,345,833
2007: $ 99,670,332
2006: $ 94,424,499
2005: $ 87,032,933
2004: $ 90,560,00

The Tigers payroll since 2004
2010: $133,995,400
2009: $115,085,145
2008: $137,685,196
2007: $ 95,180,369
2006: $ 82,612,866
2005: $ 69,092,000
2004: $ 46,832,000

You have to pay those players. Do you think they wanted to pay Jeter that money or even close? Don't be ignorant to prove a point.

Cannon Shell 04-09-2011 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 767592)
Who is comparing anything to the yankees? You are making your own argument there...which is nothing new. The only comparison I drew was between the dynasties and the delusional sox nation.


My point is that the Red Sox spend a lot of money and buy their world series titles. You are trying to disprove this point by...comparing them to the f ucking yankees? LOL That would be like you saying that you are thin and comparing yourself to the butterbean.

Chuck- YOU ARE RIGHT. The Red Sox spend less money than the yankees.:tro:

Well who exactly says that anybody other than the Yankees "buys" championships? Who should i compare them to? The Mariners?

No I am pointing out that the Red Sox dont spend that much more than many of the other contenders. Saying that everyone "buys" a championship is stupid and ignores good management. Sure the Red Sox can afford a mistake more than a mid market team but the team that won the title in 2004 or 07 was hardly a "bought" team any more than the White Sox were in 05 or the Cardinals in 06 or the Phis in 08 or the Giants last year. The Yankees in 2009? Considering they had 4 of the 6 highest players in history on that team...well you know.

Cannon Shell 04-09-2011 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 767596)
You have to pay those players. Do you think they wanted to pay Jeter that money or even close? Don't be ignorant to prove a point.

What do you mean you have to pay those players? They couldn't have let Posada walk? They HAD to sign Texieria? They NEEDED to pay Burnett 80 million? Someone held a gun to their head to give $12 million to a Soriano to be a 8th inning guy? Jeter is obviously a special case because of his place in the teams history but they consistently simply throw money at guys to cover their mistakes. Hell they tried to sign Lee to a monumental contract and couldnt get it done. Say what you want about Boston but at least they seem to have a plan and make most moves logically. They are just as serious a contender as the Yankees are every year since 04 and are doing it for much less. The Yankees have spent 1.398 billion in payroll since 04, Boston has spent 935 million. Thats $463 million less or 66 million a year less.

dalakhani 04-10-2011 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 767734)
What do you mean you have to pay those players? They couldn't have let Posada walk? They HAD to sign Texieria? They NEEDED to pay Burnett 80 million? Someone held a gun to their head to give $12 million to a Soriano to be a 8th inning guy? Jeter is obviously a special case because of his place in the teams history but they consistently simply throw money at guys to cover their mistakes. Hell they tried to sign Lee to a monumental contract and couldnt get it done. Say what you want about Boston but at least they seem to have a plan and make most moves logically. They are just as serious a contender as the Yankees are every year since 04 and are doing it for much less. The Yankees have spent 1.398 billion in payroll since 04, Boston has spent 935 million. Thats $463 million less or 66 million a year less.

The Yankees have had to spend more because of the legacy players from the late nineties and also because of the Arod contract...which Boston would have loved to have inherited! Again, we have had this discussion before. I don't dispute that the Sox have done a better job with payroll. But to a point where they aren't throwing some money around? What do you call Crawford and Gonzales? What do you call Lackey???? Lackey is probably the highest paid number 3 or 4 pitcher in the game. Look at what Boston pays for pitchers 3, 4 and 5. Do I have to dig out the salaries or will you just accept that they are ridiculous numbers in relation to the output especially recently?

I think the Sox are a well run franchise. But they buy their championships. Make no mistake.

dalakhani 04-10-2011 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 767724)
Well who exactly says that anybody other than the Yankees "buys" championships? Who should i compare them to? The Mariners?

No I am pointing out that the Red Sox dont spend that much more than many of the other contenders. Saying that everyone "buys" a championship is stupid and ignores good management. Sure the Red Sox can afford a mistake more than a mid market team but the team that won the title in 2004 or 07 was hardly a "bought" team any more than the White Sox were in 05 or the Cardinals in 06 or the Phis in 08 or the Giants last year. The Yankees in 2009? Considering they had 4 of the 6 highest players in history on that team...well you know.

Do you really want me to pull out the 2004 roster and how those guys were acquired or will you spare me this lesson in futility? How many homegrown players were on that 2004 squad? Lets not be silly chuckers.

dino 04-10-2011 08:58 AM

Probably a little too early for this prediction. When your main competition in the division has one starting pitcher (CC) there's always room for a comeback.

Cannon Shell 04-10-2011 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dalakhani (Post 767822)
Do you really want me to pull out the 2004 roster and how those guys were acquired or will you spare me this lesson in futility? How many homegrown players were on that 2004 squad? Lets not be silly chuckers.

So signing Ortiz for peanuts after he was released, signing Wakefield after he was released for the ML min, buying Millars contract for 3 million, picking up Bellhorn for nothing, getting Varitek as a throw in in a trade, signing Mueller for 2 million a year or less than he was making the previous year, signing Foulke for 3 million, and trading for Pedro and Shilling is "buying" a championship?

Give me a break. They won with 1 big FA signing on the team, Manny. Try to spin the Pedro or Schilling trades all you want but they gave up players for them and didnt pay them more than market value. 3 starting pitchers Lowe, Wakefield and Arroyo won 36 games between them and made less than 9 million combined.

Acting like the 2004 team was "bought" ignores the facts.

The 05 White Sox had 4 players that played significant time Thomas, Crede, Rowand and Beuhrle that were "homegrown". Is anyone saying they "bought" a championship?

The Bid 04-10-2011 06:48 PM

Post the Indians payroll because they are going to win the world series

declansharbor 04-11-2011 08:12 PM

The Red Sox look laughably abysmal tonight...Ewwww

docicu3 04-25-2011 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by declansharbor (Post 768213)
The Red Sox look laughably abysmal tonight...Ewwww

Me thinks they may have righted the ship....when Dice and Lacke pitch like Lester and Becket at their best, they may be scary good if this goes on like the recent road trip......Bring Out Your Dead may be a tad early yet ...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.