![]() |
Meltdown??
Japanese sources just announced that a meltdown may be under way at one of their nuke plants. Yesterday we heard that this was extremely unlikely but today?? Damage throughout country appears far worse than originally thought!
|
i find it interesting that the news is not really focusing on the leak. i dont think thats good.
can that radioactive cloud hit the U.S.? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
that will give me time to take cover here on the east coast. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They're still waiting on the plumber's union to agree to a contract to restore the cooling pipes...
Just kidding of course. I hope that they catch a break here and get that thing safely contained VERY soon! |
The Japanese are amazing engineers, look at those Tokyo buildings swaying feet in the earthquake, but not falling down. Which is why it is astounding, with their care and redundancy and history of excellence, that we are facing three reactor meltdowns because there isn't electricity to run the cooling. And the backup generators don't work, because they didn't think of raising them above disaster flood level.
|
Quote:
|
Mini-reactors seems an extraordinarily promising and affordable nuclear energy. Exactly the type of green innovation we should be heavily funding (google this for more recent info, you can see Toshiba, Bill Gates, lots of people going this way):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...ors-los-alamos That is a far safer nuclear energy I can fully support. Not to mention what it could do for 3rd world countries, emergency energy needs, etc. Can you imagine your neighborhood purchasing it's own energy source? Outstanding! |
A Power plant getting blown up, cuz they don't have enough power. That's a real beauty.
|
I wouldnt be so sure about the radiation in the atmosphere not being able to reach the U.S. If you look at the jet stream and water to surface airflow patterns it is possible for some to come to the U.S. hitting Hawaii first and then catching the pinapple express and making its way into So-Cali.
|
A third explosion, and a fire in a reactor extinguished, and threat of weak radiation reaching Tokyo.
:eek::( |
Quote:
Imagine what will be in the sushi. |
http://www.radiationnetwork.com/RadiationNetwork.htm
At this site you can see if you are about to grow a second head...... |
fubar..sell your g.e stock short..by the way there in nothing in those buildings you see on tv thats explosive..they are trying to seal the unit. that was demo.then they will pour 50k yards of concrete on it.the use of seawater 5 days ago is last and final option. guess the tree huggers blew this one...fossil fuels rule..hey obama still want to put small nukes all over..:rolleyes:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Don't buy a limited date flight ticket to Tokyo ....
|
The Japanese version of Larry, Moe, n' Curly better start getting a bit more creative. I detect the presence of a group of people with the creativity of pudding.
|
|
Heard an expert last night rail the Japanese government handling of the catastrophe allowing a private company and a crew of 50 to do the job? Where is the International Atomic Energy Agency?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
listen it does not matter who does what ,those units are phucked.im sure they sub- contracted out the willing mice at a nice price.in the us an most other countrys you have a allowable exposure time /rads..when you reach it you can not work in the plant..the only agency worth a damn is the nrc.us sets the rules and loves to shut down big buck power companys at the drop of a hat.they are the 800lb gorilla..those 'heros' are pawns .not highly skilled people..trust me .dog and pony show for the media.
|
Quote:
|
The people that actually run reactors are quite a bit more than a trained monkey equivalent, and at this point the 50 left are volunteers (actually there are more, they rotate in and out)
Do you guys realize what happens if they walk out? And allow things to continue to degenerate? That's not really an option. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is no choice involved about abandoning preventing continued meltdown in the 4th reactor, or in preventing that initiation in the other three. They simply can't do that. They have to attempt to prevent a runaway reaction at all costs, as long as there is continuing prevention possible. There are 4 reactors involved. Three reactors have not had core exposure or meltdown, they think the fourth (spent fuel rod) reactor had some core exposure with meltdown. They can't abandon trying to prevent that, to leave all four to initiate meltdown. Consider firemen and policemen (and military) who put themselves into life-threatening situations. It's the same thing. People that work such jobs know what the risks are. On a technical aspect, they are rotating people in and out of the various reactors, they pulled back for a couple hours today, totally, due to temporary increased radiation release, and now they are back in. |
^^^^ The usual suspects....insane, all of them.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I haven't seen anything about "fatal levels" (by which I assume you mean definitively lethal) in reactor 4, only that there was a rise with withdrawal of personnel today, now they are back. Here's a pretty good update from this afternoon: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,7701045.story |
![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.