Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Stakes Archive (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   10/8 (KEE): Phoenix S. (G3), Darley Alcibiades S. (G1) (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38704)

philcski 10-05-2010 02:06 PM

10/8 (KEE): Phoenix S. (G3), Darley Alcibiades S. (G1)
 
8TH (4:45) Phoenix S. (G3)

6 Furlongs (All Weather Track) | Open | 3 Year Olds And Up Stakes | Purse: $175,000

1 Goldzar Lebron V 118 L
2 Greeley's Conquest Mena M 118 L
3 Wise Dan Bejarano R 116 LA
4 Wild L Corbett G W 118 LA
5 Warrior's Reward Leparoux J R 124 L
6 Moralist Sellers S J 118 LA
7 Hollywood Hit McAleney J S 122 L
8 Super Robusto Baze M C 118 LA
9 Ez Dreamer Albarado R J 118 LA
10 Rockin' Rockstar Martinez W 116 LA
11 Canonize Espinoza V 118 L



9TH (5:20) Darley Alcibiades S. (G1)

1 1/16 Miles (All Weather Track) | Fillies | 2 Year Olds Stakes | Purse: $400,000

1 Poof Too Husbands P 118 LA
2 Harlan's Ruby Leparoux J R 118 LA
3 Jordy Y Alvarado J 118 LA
4 Wonderlandbynight Baird E T 118 L
5 Brushfirefairytale Goncalves L R 118
6 Wickedly Perfect Bejarano R 118 LA
7 Forest Legend Lenclud F 118 LA
8 Dos Lunas Court J K 118 L

chucklestheclown 10-05-2010 02:10 PM

Ezdreamer by a mile, wonderlandbynight by two.

NTamm1215 10-05-2010 02:15 PM

These are nice races and the card is solid.

Interesting decision to cut Warrior's Reward back to 6 furlongs. He's going to take money and will be a horrible bet in the Phoenix. Giving weight on a course that he ran poorly over last year at a distance that's at least a furlong shorter than his best is a bad idea.

I'm surprised they're staying the sprint route with him and not looking more at the Dirt Mile. He could have prepped in the Kelso and carried basically level weights with the favorites but is instead giving weight (albeit 2 lbs) to a freaky sprinter like Hollywood Hit.

Charlie Lopresti's Wise Dan is an interesting horse, I thought his Derby day race was good and the nation has become a little bit more familiar with him thanks to Here Comes Ben.

NT

blackthroatedwind 10-05-2010 02:29 PM

And one of the horses from the Alcibiades will be a Grade 1 winner.

NTamm1215 10-05-2010 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 703696)
And one of the horses from the Alcibiades will be a Grade 1 winner.

The Alcibiades has accumulated quite the illustrious history since being moved to synthetics. Its winners include:

2006 - The maiden Bel Air Beauty, who went 1-7 the rest of her career and later picked up a win in the Valley View.

2007 - The maiden Country Star, who went on to win the Hollywood Starlet but needed a drop in class to allowance company to get her only win in a 3YO campaign that was tremendously disappointing.

2008 - Dream Empress, who went 0-7 afterwards with a 3rd place finish her best performance. But hey, McPeek was going to run her at Ascot!

2009 - Negligee, who effectively ruined the chances of Biofuel in the BC Juv Fillies and came back for a 3YO season which has been highlighted by...absolutely nothing. She's 0-4.

parsixfarms 10-05-2010 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 703696)
And one of the horses from the Alcibiades will be a Grade 1 winner.

I agree, but in fairness, couldn't we say the same thing about the Spinaway, and in all likelihood, this weekend's Frizette?

hockey2315 10-05-2010 02:38 PM

I completely agree with your take on Warrior's Reward, Nick. Personally, though, I don't think he'd have any shot whatsoever in the Mile. He's just not a very good horse. It feels like he's rested on the laurels of his dream-trip Borel and mud-aided Churchill allowance win for his entire career. I know that he has won a GI since then, but it was a weak renewal of the event. With all that said, the sprint division is so incredibly weak now that he's got a better shot to hit the board there.

Fatal Bullet was an excellent single last year in this race, and ended up being a higher price than he should have been (still favored I think) because dirt horses took money. Don't have the PPs on my blackberry, but I'd guess that Hollywood Hit will probably be similarly single-worthy here.

I love betting Keeneland even though nothing that happens on that surface has any relevance the rest of the year. You can eliminate 60% of the field in a glance, and a lot of those horses are chalks. Take your PPs for a Keeneland card, cross out every horse who hasn't run on poly or turf, and then see how you do.

NTamm1215 10-05-2010 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms (Post 703699)
I agree, but in fairness, couldn't we say the same thing about the Spinaway, and in all likelihood, this weekend's Frizette?

The Frizette is soon to be cancelled and re-carded for Sunday morning at 7:30 AM on the training track. It will be dubbed the Pletcher since he has basically every quality 2YO filly eligible for the race.

parsixfarms 10-05-2010 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215 (Post 703698)
The Alcibiades has accumulated quite the illustrious history since being moved to synthetics. Its winners include:

2006 - The maiden Bel Air Beauty, who went 1-7 the rest of her career and later picked up a win in the Valley View.

2007 - The maiden Country Star, who went on to win the Hollywood Starlet but needed a drop in class to allowance company to get her only win in a 3YO campaign that was tremendously disappointing.

2008 - Dream Empress, who went 0-7 afterwards with a 3rd place finish her best performance. But hey, McPeek was going to run her at Ascot!

2009 - Negligee, who effectively ruined the chances of Biofuel in the BC Juv Fillies and came back for a 3YO season which has been highlighted by...absolutely nothing. She's 0-4.

This race could be Exhibit A in what's wrong with the Graded Stakes system. In the last ten years, only Runway Model and Take Charge Lady won the Alcibiades and went on to become fillies of note.

blackthroatedwind 10-05-2010 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms (Post 703699)
I agree, but in fairness, couldn't we say the same thing about the Spinaway, and in all likelihood, this weekend's Frizette?

I was thinking similarly....but at least those are Graded horses. The Alcibiades field is really awful.

Linny 10-05-2010 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parsixfarms (Post 703702)
This race could be Exhibit A in what's wrong with the Graded Stakes system. In the last ten years, only Runway Model and Take Charge Lady won the Alcibiades and went on to become fillies of note.

KEE has been the beneficiary of "grade creep" for years. Remember when the Oak Tree Mile was sending out BC winner/runners-up in droves and the Shadwell Mile got an upgrade?

So few barns run their serious horses before September of their 2yo season (and when they do run it's very infrequent) that we should look at the Euro model of only calling late season destination races G1.

philcski 10-05-2010 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Linny (Post 703786)
KEE has been the beneficiary of "grade creep" for years. Remember when the Oak Tree Mile was sending out BC winner/runners-up in droves and the Shadwell Mile got an upgrade?

So few barns run their serious horses before September of their 2yo season (and when they do run it's very infrequent) that we should look at the Euro model of only calling late season destination races G1.

Glad I'm not the only one who thinks this. There are several races at KEE that deserve to be downgraded that haven't been. Alcibiades included.

chucklestheclown 10-05-2010 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 703900)
Glad I'm not the only one who thinks this. There are several races at KEE that deserve to be downgraded that haven't been. Alcibiades included.

You don't like the 4?

chucklestheclown 10-05-2010 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215 (Post 703698)
The Alcibiades has accumulated quite the illustrious history since being moved to synthetics. Its winners include:

2006 - The maiden Bel Air Beauty, who went 1-7 the rest of her career and later picked up a win in the Valley View.

2007 - The maiden Country Star, who went on to win the Hollywood Starlet but needed a drop in class to allowance company to get her only win in a 3YO campaign that was tremendously disappointing.

2008 - Dream Empress, who went 0-7 afterwards with a 3rd place finish her best performance. But hey, McPeek was going to run her at Ascot!

2009 - Negligee, who effectively ruined the chances of Biofuel in the BC Juv Fillies and came back for a 3YO season which has been highlighted by...absolutely nothing. She's 0-4.

Wow...4 years.Country Star was a very nice filly who had issues, Negligee just has a shitty trainer.

Dahoss 10-05-2010 08:44 PM

I'm probably reaching a lot here, but I'm going to bet a few dollars on Forest Legend in the Alcibiades. Before her win last out, Vicki Oliver was just 2 for 45 with firsters over the last five years and 1 for 18 with 2 year old firsters.

I guess that explains why she went off at those odds last time, because she is really bred well for the grass. That isn't a redboard, I didn't bet her, but her dam could really run and she's a half to recent Ballston Spa runnerup Silver Reunion. I think this one can run a bit.

There is decent amount of speed in here and this race has seen it's fair share of surprise winners, since it's been run on poly. Oliver is 33% in the money going turf to poly at Keeneland and Keeneland is her home track. I'm going to bet her to win and then underneath Harlan's Ruby, Jordy Y and Wonderlandbynight in exactas.

philcski 10-05-2010 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 703925)
I'm probably reaching a lot here, but I'm going to bet a few dollars on Forest Legend in the Alcibiades. Before her win last out, Vicki Oliver was just 2 for 45 with firsters over the last five years and 1 for 18 with 2 year old firsters.

I guess that explains why she went off at those odds last time, because she is really bred well for the grass. That isn't a redboard, I didn't bet her, but her dam could really run and she's a half to recent Ballston Spa runnerup Silver Reunion. I think this one can run a bit.

There is decent amount of speed in here and this race has seen it's fair share of surprise winners, since it's been run on poly. Oliver is 33% in the money going turf to poly at Keeneland and Keeneland is her home track. I'm going to bet her to win and then underneath Harlan's Ruby, Jordy Y and Wonderlandbynight in exactas.

There is no such thing as reaching on synthetics, especially with 2yo's at Keeneland. Just about anything can happen and usually does. I say take a shot with her.

I kind of like Dos Lunas in here who will be a similar price. I loved her debut, very good synthetic pedigree and word is the work on Saturday was excellent. Cross out the Saratoga try and she fits well.

Dahoss 10-05-2010 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 703942)
There is no such thing as reaching on synthetics, especially with 2yo's at Keeneland. Just about anything can happen and usually does. I say take a shot with her.

I kind of like Dos Lunas in here who will be a similar price. I loved her debut, very good synthetic pedigree and word is the work on Saturday was excellent. Cross out the Saratoga try and she fits well.

I bet Dos Lunas last time at Woodbine because her race two back was huge I thought. But what kind of odds are you expecting? I'll be shocked if she isn't a lot shorter than Forest Legend oddswise.

miraja2 10-06-2010 07:32 AM

I was hoping to bet against Wonderlandbynight and Jordy Y because all they did was pick up the pieces (in pretty unimpressive fashion) after the Arlington Lassie completely fell apart in front of them. Unfortunately, I'm not sure this is going to end up being the right spot to bet against them, and Wonderlandbynight isn't awful. At least she has proven she can win routing on synthetic.

I think I'll probably end up skipping this one.

philcski 10-06-2010 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 703951)
I bet Dos Lunas last time at Woodbine because her race two back was huge I thought. But what kind of odds are you expecting? I'll be shocked if she isn't a lot shorter than Forest Legend oddswise.

15-1ish maybe? I figure Wickedly Perfect will be around 3/2, 8/5 and Harlan's Ruby, Jordy Y, and Wonderlandbynight all around 4-1, 5-1. Forest Legend probably will be 30-1, 40-1. Harlan's Ruby will be overbet because it's McPeek/Leparoux. Have not seen the TG's yet though which could move the numbers around some.

Gate Dancer 10-06-2010 08:54 AM

I'll be using Poof Too as my exacta horse for this race. Interesting comparison between the maiden breaker for Poof Too and the Ontario Debutante that Wonderlandbynight ran in. The maiden race was faster at each call and final time. Breeding suggests no problem for her either on the stretchout. With a little second race improvement, I think she might be in the mix. Rail post is still nice at Keeneland in route races. Price should be appealing as well.

LARHAGE 10-06-2010 09:30 AM

I haven't heard of 80% of the horses in any of these races, such is the state of racing today, I won't even watch these races, I have vacuming to do.

ateamstupid 10-06-2010 09:34 AM

The Phoenix is actually really solid for a G3. Obviously the Alcibiades needs to be downgraded, but a good opening day card put together by Keeneland.

blackthroatedwind 10-06-2010 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 704078)
15-1ish maybe? I figure Wickedly Perfect will be around 3/2, 8/5 and Harlan's Ruby, Jordy Y, and Wonderlandbynight all around 4-1, 5-1. Forest Legend probably will be 30-1, 40-1. Harlan's Ruby will be overbet because it's McPeek/Leparoux. Have not seen the TG's yet though which could move the numbers around some.


I'm sorry, you think Dos Lunas will be around 15:1?

I'm confused...right? She looks around 7:2 or less to me.

philcski 10-06-2010 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 704093)
I'm sorry, you think Dos Lunas will be around 15:1?

I'm confused...right? She looks around 7:2 or less to me.

I think she will be the 5th choice behind Wickedly Perfect, Wonderlandbynight, Jordy Y, and Harlan's Ruby. If all of those horses are 4-1, 5-1 or less she almost has to be 10-1 or higher by default. Really depends on how much money Wickedly Perfect takes- if she's a tepid 3-1 favorite then she will be closer to 8-1, if she is heavily bet like I think she might be, Dos Lunas will be closer to 15-1.

7/2 would be really surprising to me, honestly.

blackthroatedwind 10-06-2010 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 704096)
I think she will be the 5th choice behind Wickedly Perfect, Wonderlandbynight, Jordy Y, and Harlan's Ruby. If all of those horses are 4-1, 5-1 or less she almost has to be 10-1 or higher by default. Really depends on how much money Wickedly Perfect takes- if she's a tepid 3-1 favorite then she will be closer to 8-1, if she is heavily bet like I think she might be, Dos Lunas will be closer to 15-1.

7/2 would be really surprising to me, honestly.

She is 5:1 ML.

I don't know how you think she can be that price. It doesn't seem even remotely possible.

miraja2 10-06-2010 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 704101)
She is 5:1 ML.

I don't know how you think she can be that price. It doesn't seem even remotely possible.

Well, he may well be right about her being the 5th choice on the board come post time, but it seems to me that this is the sort of race where the 5th choice might be 9/2 while the favorite is 5/2.

All I know for sure here is that I wouldn't want the Catalano.

philcski 10-06-2010 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 704101)
She is 5:1 ML.

I don't know how you think she can be that price. It doesn't seem even remotely possible.

I could very well be wrong and she could go off around there, especially if my guess on the McPeek taking a lot of money is wrong. But if you want to analyze it off the ML- if the morning lines are correct on the other horses in the race... she would be 11-1.

Coach Pants 10-06-2010 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 703942)
There is no such thing as reaching on synthetics, especially with 2yo's at Keeneland. Just about anything can happen and usually does. I say take a shot with her.

I kind of like Dos Lunas in here who will be a similar price. I loved her debut, very good synthetic pedigree and word is the work on Saturday was excellent. Cross out the Saratoga try and she fits well.

I like Dos Lunas as well but only at 8-1 or greater.

blackthroatedwind 10-06-2010 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants (Post 704165)
I like Dos Lunas as well but only at 8-1 or greater.

I'm only betting Goldikova in the BC Mile if she's over 17:1. Maybe 15....but I want 17:1.

Coach Pants 10-06-2010 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 704171)
I'm only betting Goldikova in the BC Mile if she's over 17:1. Maybe 15....but I want 17:1.

Yeah I'm that far off.

*canned laughter*

blackthroatedwind 10-06-2010 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants (Post 704172)
Yeah I'm that far off.

*canned laughter*

No, you're not....but she can't be 8:1.

Coach Pants 10-06-2010 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 704188)
No, you're not....but she can't be 8:1.

Yeah it's reaching. Maybe if there were 2 more horses in the race.

Mike 10-08-2010 01:24 PM

I'll pass the Alcibiades.
In the Phoenix, I'll side with the longshot, Super Robusto

High Quality in the 7th

philcski 10-08-2010 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 704188)
No, you're not....but she can't be 8:1.

:rolleyes:

Coach Pants 10-08-2010 04:32 PM

Too bad she was.

Dahoss 10-08-2010 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 705135)
:rolleyes:

To be fair, you weren't exactly close with her odds. First you thought she would be "a similar price" to Forest Legend. FL was 39-1, DL was 8-1. Not really similar. You also thought she would be 15-1 if Wickedly Perfect got bet hard. She did and DL was still half of that.

philcski 10-08-2010 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 705141)
To be fair, you weren't exactly close with her odds. First you thought she would be "a similar price" to Forest Legend. FL was 39-1, DL was 8-1. Not really similar. You also thought she would be 15-1 if Wickedly Perfect got bet hard. She did and DL was still half of that.

I don't really want to argue this any more, especially because nobody won on the race, but 8-1 to 15-1 (plus a scratch) is a LOT closer to 7/2 in a parimutuel pool.

I also said FL would be 30-1, 40-1 versus an admittedly hopeful 15-1 on DL.

Dahoss 10-08-2010 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 705158)
I don't really want to argue this any more, especially because nobody won on the race, but 8-1 to 15-1 (plus a scratch) is a LOT closer to 7/2 in a parimutuel pool.

I also said FL would be 30-1, 40-1 versus an admittedly hopeful 15-1 on DL.

The point is, you were wrong also, right? Don't you generally have to be right in order to pat yourself on the back? If anyone could, it would be CP, who was dead on with her odds.

RockHardTen1985 10-08-2010 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski (Post 705158)
I don't really want to argue this any more, especially because nobody won on the race, but 8-1 to 15-1 (plus a scratch) is a LOT closer to 7/2 in a parimutuel pool.

I also said FL would be 30-1, 40-1 versus an admittedly hopeful 15-1 on DL.

TO be fair, I was live to your house at 8-1 and Hoss horse at 40-1 in the pick 3 for $2.50.... So you both suck.

philcski 10-08-2010 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dahoss (Post 705160)
The point is, you were wrong also, right? Don't you generally have to be right in order to pat yourself on the back? If anyone could, it would be CP, who was dead on with her odds.

I wasn't right on the race at all. My selection finished a well-beaten 6th. No back patting going on here, guy.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.