Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Rachel Alexandra Retired (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38589)

smuthg 09-28-2010 03:26 PM

Rachel Alexandra Retired
 
Rachel Alexandra Retired
Posted: 4:20 PM ET

Reigning Horse of the Year Rachel Alexandra (f, 4, Medaglia d'Oro) has been retired, majority owner Jess Jackson announced today. "As you know, despite top training and a patient campaign, Rachel Alexandra did not return to her 2009 form," said Jackson. "I believe it's time to retire our champion and reward her with a less stressful life. We are delighted that she will retire healthy and happy to our beautiful farm in Kentucky. Rachel Alexandra owes us nothing. As a three-year-old, she set standards and records that no filly before her ever achieved. And I suspect it will be quite a while before a three year old filly ever equals or surpasses her achievements. Although her fans were thrilled by a series of spectacular victories, I believe they, as we, were simply awed time and again by her sheer beauty, courage and athleticism."

Coach Pants 09-28-2010 03:29 PM

less stressful life...hahaha

Can he be any more insufferable?

Merlinsky 09-28-2010 03:40 PM

So that bullet work was for what? Kicks? :rolleyes: Did she hurt herself or something and he's just not admitting it?

ateamstupid 09-28-2010 03:40 PM

Shocking news. :rolleyes:

iamthelurker 09-28-2010 03:47 PM

He knows she would get smashed in any BC race, trying to save face by pulling an Aga Khan and breeding her to his male champ (Curlin).... so not cool.

MisterB 09-28-2010 03:55 PM

Breed, baby breed. We need horses like you

smuthg 09-28-2010 03:56 PM

I only saw her in person once, and that was in the fantasy at Oaklawn. One of the most impressive performances I've ever seen. Calvin didn't touch until just past the wire when he gave her a slight tap to encourage her to get a 1 1/8th. I think they were halfway down the back stretch before the rest of the field crossed the wire. when you have your first adult beverage (or your next) today, I think a toast is in order to Rachel...

knickslions2 09-28-2010 04:00 PM

This thread should be fun

Thunder Gulch 09-28-2010 04:12 PM

Hate they are taking the easy way out, but I guess the writing was on the wall with a string of disappointments....pretty clear she wasn't ever going to regain that 2008 form with Assmussen pulling the strings.

Princess Doreen 09-28-2010 04:12 PM

I'm just as big a Rachel fan as any Rachel fan can get, but a horse player/lover has to recognize limitations. Rachel will remain one of the greatest 3-year olds to ever grace the racing world. She did not return to such greatness as a 4-year old, but I venture to say that she didn't embarrass herself either. That run she made in the Personal Ensign brings tears to my eyes. Watching this great filly running on heart alone that last furlong was as great as watching her win any race that she did.

Tears of sadness that I will never see her race again or visit her early mornings at Oklahoma, but sad tears mixed with tears of happiness that she retired safe and healthy.

ODE TO A HORSE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMHexZ2I3xI

Merlinsky 09-28-2010 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamthelurker (Post 700574)
He knows she would get smashed in any BC race, trying to save face by pulling an Aga Khan and breeding her to his male champ (Curlin).... so not cool.

http://www.suite101.com/content/oaks...curlin-a115602

He planned on breeding her to Curlin the minute he bought her post-Oaks. It's one of the big reasons he bought her in the first place. She just threw a bullet work out there, so it's hardly evidence of her ability to get smashed.

This was all about Classic or nothing. If she was best suited for the Ladies Classic, we should've known he wouldn't wanna do it period. Can't make all the fuss about facing Zenyatta and running in the BCC, then bail and go the day before.

slotdirt 09-28-2010 04:20 PM

Saw her twice - Oaks and Preakness '09 - probably the two most impressive non-Barbaro races I've ever witnessed in person, superlatives intended.

Why the surprise though? It's not like anybody couldn't have seen this coming.

TheSpyder 09-28-2010 04:31 PM

Will the bullet work be on her final racing form stats? Will they continue to work her as part of her breeding program?

ateamstupid 09-28-2010 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamthelurker (Post 700574)
He knows she would get smashed in any BC race, trying to save face by pulling an Aga Khan and breeding her to his male champ (Curlin).... so not cool.

She would've gotten smashed in the Distaff? By who? Malibu Prayer?

Antitrust32 09-28-2010 04:45 PM

retired after suffering a strained hair braid.

miraja2 09-28-2010 04:48 PM

The way they (and many others) talk it is like she went from being the best horse to ever run in 2009 to being a complete bum this year.
It is complete nonsense. Her races last year weren't that much better than some of the races she has run this year. Last year her performances were overrated....this year underrated.
Retiring her is certainly not a shocking move by them....but it is completely moronic.

johnny pinwheel 09-28-2010 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ateamstupid (Post 700571)
Shocking news. :rolleyes:

agreed

Coach Pants 09-28-2010 04:49 PM

"We don't mind losing as long as she's healthy"

Yeah. So what's the excuse now? Did your life coach give her a look-see and tell you she's stressed out?

Big narcissist ape. It's all about him and she's not up to his lofty, deluded standards.

smartbid09 09-28-2010 04:58 PM

I am shocked. I wish things were different:(

iamthelurker 09-28-2010 04:59 PM

The Rachel lovers can say whatever they want defending him, but Jackson (with the equal help of the Mosses) prevented the biggest possible event in our game today from happening. That WAS a race between two soon to be legendary HOF mares in Zenyatta and Rachel. The match-up would have done wonders for the sports popularity and general public opinion, they failed. No fault to either horse (I love both of these champions), but a strong blame should fall on their owners. I said it before in this thread, he doesn't like to lose, the Aga Khan cop out looked like a better alternative to him and that's what just happened.

Clip-Clop 09-28-2010 05:16 PM

She will be missed on the track, hell of a year last year. Fortunate enough (despite the weather) to see her in the Haskell last year. Always fun to see what the horses she beat up (win or lose) on come back to do next.

Blind Luck to the Beldame?

Clip-Clop 09-28-2010 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus (Post 700623)
I don't recall the changes to the Hall of Fame voting, but if both have been retired at the end of the season and are eligible to be placed on the ballot at at the same time and only one can get in...

That will be decided in 6 weeks.

miraja2 09-28-2010 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamthelurker (Post 700615)
The Rachel lovers can say whatever they want defending him, but Jackson (with the equal help of the Mosses) prevented the biggest possible event in our game today from happening. That WAS a race between two soon to be legendary HOF mares in Zenyatta and Rachel. The match-up would have done wonders for the sports popularity and general public opinion, they failed. No fault to either horse (I love both of these champions), but a strong blame should fall on their owners. I said it before in this thread, he doesn't like to lose, the Aga Khan cop out looked like a better alternative to him and that's what just happened.

Why would "Rachel lovers" want to defend him or the gutless campaigning of the horse this year? Fans of the horse - even more than anyone else - should be pissed at him.

Clip-Clop 09-28-2010 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardus (Post 700626)
The new rules do not segment by category, so it is a moot point.

Under the old rules, it would have been interesting in Internet Land.

My thought was if she wins the Classic again no contest. If not then perhaps RA goes first...

Merlinsky 09-28-2010 05:26 PM

Keep working her til the Eclipse Awards, then announce her unretirement when you don't win HOY. From what I've seen this year, that sets Rachel up well to win the Classic in 2011.

chucklestheclown 09-28-2010 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smuthg (Post 700583)
I only saw her in person once, and that was in the fantasy at Oaklawn. One of the most impressive performances I've ever seen. Calvin didn't touch until just past the wire when he gave her a slight tap to encourage her to get a 1 1/8th. I think they were halfway down the back stretch before the rest of the field crossed the wire. when you have your first adult beverage (or your next) today, I think a toast is in order to Rachel...

Done...thank you Rachel.

randallscott35 09-28-2010 05:35 PM

A great horse, sorry to see her go.

Antitrust32 09-28-2010 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamthelurker (Post 700615)
The Rachel lovers can say whatever they want defending him, but Jackson (with the equal help of the Mosses) prevented the biggest possible event in our game today from happening. That WAS a race between two soon to be legendary HOF mares in Zenyatta and Rachel. The match-up would have done wonders for the sports popularity and general public opinion, they failed. No fault to either horse (I love both of these champions), but a strong blame should fall on their owners. I said it before in this thread, he doesn't like to lose, the Aga Khan cop out looked like a better alternative to him and that's what just happened.

false.

no "match-up" will make horse racing popular.

Coach Pants 09-28-2010 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 700644)
false.

no "match-up" will make horse racing popular.

Chances are it wouldn't but there is no way of knowing because we're stuck with chicken-s.hit owners and trainers at the top level.

Cannon Shell 09-28-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamthelurker (Post 700615)
The Rachel lovers can say whatever they want defending him, but Jackson (with the equal help of the Mosses) prevented the biggest possible event in our game today from happening. That WAS a race between two soon to be legendary HOF mares in Zenyatta and Rachel. The match-up would have done wonders for the sports popularity and general public opinion, they failed. No fault to either horse (I love both of these champions), but a strong blame should fall on their owners. I said it before in this thread, he doesn't like to lose, the Aga Khan cop out looked like a better alternative to him and that's what just happened.

very true.

Cannon Shell 09-28-2010 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 700644)
false.

no "match-up" will make horse racing popular.

It would have been quite an event that would have deservedly gotten a whole lot of attention. It really is disgraceful that the two great fillies never met despite the ample opportunities. In an era where 'historic' races are few and far between, it would have been worthy.

dagolfer33 09-28-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knickslions2 (Post 700585)
This thread should be fun

It will certainly be a great relief to those who touted her as being able to beat Z in the classic. Now they won't have to eat that crow. Happy retirement Rachel, you were the most sensational 3 year old some of us may ever witness.

my miss storm cat 09-28-2010 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iamthelurker (Post 700615)
The Rachel lovers can say whatever they want defending him, but Jackson (with the equal help of the Mosses) prevented the biggest possible event in our game today from happening. That WAS a race between two soon to be legendary HOF mares in Zenyatta and Rachel. The match-up would have done wonders for the sports popularity and general public opinion, they failed. No fault to either horse (I love both of these champions), but a strong blame should fall on their owners. I said it before in this thread, he doesn't like to lose, the Aga Khan cop out looked like a better alternative to him and that's what just happened.

Bullshit.

It never would have happened and besides, even if it had? It would have done zero for the sports popularity.

Anyway here's to a long and happy life. I never did get to see her in person but man... I will never forget her wins and how breathtaking they were.

my miss storm cat 09-28-2010 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32 (Post 700644)
false.

no "match-up" will make horse racing popular.

Oh I didn't see this till now.

Great minds...

Sightseek 09-28-2010 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dagolfer33 (Post 700656)
Happy retirement Rachel, you were the most sensational 3 year old some of us may ever witness.

Really well said.

Danzig 09-28-2010 07:31 PM

this sport somehow manages to leave it's fans unhappy far too often. too bad they were never able to manage to get zenyatta and rachel to meet. now, jess jackson is an ass...but had he not bought rachel, we wouldn't have had a preakness, haskell and woodward like we had last year. they obviously felt rachel wasn't up to the classic in nov, and anything else would have left everyone unsatisfied. best of luck to rachel in the future.

blackthroatedwind 09-28-2010 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell (Post 700648)
It would have been quite an event that would have deservedly gotten a whole lot of attention. It really is disgraceful that the two great fillies never met despite the ample opportunities. In an era where 'historic' races are few and far between, it would have been worthy.

The irony, of course, is that if Shirreffs hadn't sent Zardana to the Fair Grounds, the $5 Million Apple Blossom would have taken place.

Danzig 09-28-2010 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind (Post 700676)
The irony, of course, is that if Shirreffs hadn't sent Zardana to the Fair Grounds, the $5 Million Apple Blossom would have taken place.

makes you wonder, doesn't it? if he wanted the faceoff so bad...why send zardana? everyone knew what would happen if rachel lost that day.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.