Sharron Angle hands election to Harry Reid
 

Sharron ... first, you said children who where raped by their fathers should bear the baby (no abortion permitted) should they become pregnant because it was God's will.

Then, you said you are running on no liquor in Vegas.

And repealing Medicare and Social Security

And your current PR blitz is:

http://www.nationalreview.com/battle...elizabeth-crum

yeah, because 'god has a plan' and when god hands you lemons, apparently you're supposed to make lemonade. :rolleyes:


omg. i just read the link. lol she wants the press to be her friend...she sounded like someone else just then.


sarah palin:

"I think it's appalling and a violation of our freedom of the press."
—Speaking about the negative media coverage of Republican congressional candidate Vaughn Ward, Boise, Idaho, May 21, 2010

Sharron Angle on the press -
"We wanted them to ask the questions we want to answer so that they report the news the way we want it to be reported.”

UPDATE:

I believe what she really wants is some to run her Propaganda campaign... This isn't about being elected, she wants to take control and force her Christian ways upon us all.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._nevada_senate

Despite all the hoopla she trails by 2 % points. Since the economic news looks like it is about to get worse a hard hit state like Nevada is much more likely to forget stuff that happens in July when they are voting in November especially since the GOP finally installed a professional mouthpiece for Angle. The idea that Harry Reid is a lock to win is a bit premature.

Angle used to be ahead by 11.

Edit: and remember that Angle is famously on record recently saying that, as a US Senator, it is "not her job" to help create jobs.

I really want Harry Reid to beat this crazy bitch.

In defense of Angle's abortion position- she's actually being much more consistent than most of America. If one really believes abortion is murder, then it's murder no matter under what circumstances the baby was conceived. A baby conceived from rape is just as innoncent as one conceived from not using a condom.

Opposing abortion except in cases of rape and incest means simply that you are opposed to women having consensual sex for reasons other than procreation. Angle's position is considerably less offensive.

And Republicans have opposed Social Security since its inception. Angle is just being open about the right's position on these issues, rather than hiding behind doublespeak about trickle-down and self-reliance and states' rights and whatever other gobbledygook is spewed to cover up the objective of institutionalizing inequality. She's just being honest. And people are calling her crazy for it.

But yes, she is handing Reid the election on a silver platter. Which, for this liberal, sucks, as I'd rather see someone else in charge of the Senate.

Someone has spoken well of you...perhaps they o d'd on their antihistamines.


All the same...is there a way I can receive a photo of your boo bees today?

I will never set foot in Las Vegas as long as Harry Reid is in office

How's that different from what liberal Democrats have been doing? Is this OK if the press actually is your friend, again, like the liberals have?

Good points, and she might be seen as radical in a blue state.

But if life does begin at conception, which is more likely than any other place, her position is not crazy.

And many oppose social security because of it being an actual Ponzi scheme that must crash, and people will be left holding the bag at retirement no matter how many adjustments are made. That is also not crazy.

But as I led out with in this response, it might be too far a departure from the positions of previous senators for this election.

Angles position is beyond crazy to women that think they should not be forced by law to incubate, birth, financially and physically support, and raise the child of the criminal who raped them.

I disagree that Angle is all that honest in reflecting her beliefs and intentions if elected to the Senate. She is going out of her way to hide those very values from public scrutiny, in an attempt to get elected, from taking her positions off her website to avoiding questions from the press and public.

I will make it two of us. F Reid.

Your first point illustrates what a problem the abortion issue is. You are correct in that of course the crime of rape should not carry longterm or life long additional damages for the woman. The problem is what to do with a life that is by its very definition, innocent. If there is a capital sentence in the crime, it ought not be carried out on an innocent life. No one has found a good answer to this yet.

Your second point seems to be that you fear that Angle will employ exactly the same tactics in getting elected -- I'll quote you here: "She is going out of her way to hide those very values from public scrutiny, in an attempt to get elected, from taking her positions off her website to avoiding questions from the press and public." -- as Obama did. It's just different values this time. She's not a socialist.

:tro:

:zz:

Prior to election, Obama didn't avoid the press nor interviews as Angle is doing. He participated in multiple public candidate debates and press conferences. Obama didn't take controversial or extremist views and issues off his website to hide them from public view. If that's not true, perhaps you could point out what you are specifically talking about.

Keep dreaming!

That's true, the GOP seems to have embraced the Tea Party with open arms.

He kept his views hidden, distancing himself from terrorist Bill Ayers, reverend Jeremiah Wright, and the radicals he has surrounded himself with for years, until he became president and could hire radicals like Van Jones, Cass Sundstein and Anita Dunn. And now he has a redistributionist for the new head of the Medicare and Medicaid programs, who is presumably the guy who will usher in ObamaCare.

He stopped talking about a civilian military-style security force because people were getting nervous. He slipped and told "Joe the Plumber" that he wanted to "spread the wealth around".

He did take things down off of his website, but that was after he was president-elect. The whole "forced volunteerism" thing was taken down in short order.

Without the stealth, the very polished political consultants, the implications of racism against his critics, the watered down "Yes we can" and "Change" slogans, he wouldn't have quite made it.

I am sure Glenn Beck loves you.

Never met the man.

As for the security force quote, not making it up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwaAVJITx1Y

Maybe you hadn't heard it before?

Not exactly! Do you even know what impeccable means?

dough!!




You had to ask??

Honestly I cant stand Harry Reid. But Sharron Angle seems to be an equally bad choice, and at lead Reid isnt bat **** crazy like Angle.

I hope a third person gets voted in.

And the Sharron Angle angle gets better and better:

:D You want to be taken seriously, yet you post that video?

Yes, I've heard that before - the whole speech - not just one cut off sentence!

You want to make the argument that the GOP has not embraced the Tea Party?
Please, go right ahead.

read something other than Rolling Stone,Slate and Newsweek and you'd see!
Forgot to mention DU...silly, I know:eek:

Sorry, I don't read any of the above. I don't know what DU is. I do read Daily Beast.

I haven't seen the argument that "the GOP has not embraced the Tea Party" anywhere - even on conservative sites. How about posting a reference, if that belief is out there in multiple media?

When I can, if I can! You seem to think that something positive will be said about TeaParty and Repubs in MSM!!! Not probable or likely.......but I'll look.
Forgive me for taking the nite off:rolleyes:

Forgiven :)

But we're not talking about finding positive PR regarding the Tea Party and Republican party (and no, I hope there is not "PR" in the MSM as Sharron Angle wishes, just "reporting"), the contention was that the GOP is not trying to embrace the Tea Party. No, have not seen that. Quite the opposite.

please you almost squirted over the Rolliing Stone article with the General bashing Obama & Co! Of course that was personality #3 and not #6

No Dell, I don't read Rolling Stone regularly. Sorry.

Post number 31 of this thread Sybil

I haven't been following the race but figure she couldn't be any worse than Harry

I'm guessing Angle doesn't want the federal government to be big brother
and that has the nannies hyperventilating

When the stuff about McCrystal came out, yes, I went to and read the original article. And no, I don't read Rolling Stone daily or regularly.

I know those are two extremely complex thoughts, and you obviously have a very hard time understanding how both can be true. Good luck :tro:

Classic not-ready-for-prime-time teabagger

Hilarious that they have some slick con helping the doofus now.

Slick con? Bill Clinton?