Monmouth handle & attendance
 

From the Asbury Park Press
Saturday's total handle of $9,787,620 was the largest handle outside of a Haskell or Breeders Cup day in Monmouth's history

The previous largest handle was $9,357,444 set on opening day May 22,2010

Total handle was up 128.3%. On track handle up almost 54% and attendance was up 22.2%

We went over to Monmouth yesterday to catch the stake races. Great weather, good racing but blew the tri when I had everything but Take the Points. Still a nice couple of hours hanging with the family and watching the horses. Heading back on Monday

Some people in Joisey are coming back.

Sadly, the dude I know who lets me use his NJ account pissed through a few thousand in the last 10 days ... will be interesting to see how many times he reloads and comes back firing.

Oyyy.

This just in:

For the present MTH meet:

29 plays, 41% win %, +137% ROI. (more than DOUBLE my money).

And I wasn't going to play this track.

This is the kind of **** that should be relevant to horseplayers. Not how many locals made their way down to the track or how much money was bet or how big the fields are or how good the stock was or how fast they ran, or how many well bred babies were entered or which of those babies' sires had higher Beyers, etc.

Monmouth bought me a new Mazda Miata. I'm AWESOME!

The Thistleydowns got me a brand new industrial park...






I'm bettah!!

He is seriously the greatest.

I'm sure his on track winnings more than offset those losses.

Oh - without a doubt.

I appreciate it. And I give you full credit for being the PREEMINENT BEYERIAN thoroughbred historian. :rolleyes:

Just to be recognized by the innovative inventor of The Fat Charts is truly an honor.

You mean those same charts that produced TWO $40 winners this past week and a $60 winner last month (among many others)?

Btw, I considered your suggesting to put pace numbers on them then decided against it given my results utilizing them as is.

Keep using the Beyers and pace numbers religiously, it suits you. Though you might actually want to go on a limb and discuss a 'live' race every once in a while.

No one cares.

But cool.

I'm showing a top selection flat bet profit for the 3rd straight year with picks I'm making 24 hours ahead of time - before scratches and odds can even be viewed.

Even with my flawed handicapping methods and all.

I walked the Swiss Alps with nothing but a cane and size 30 fotl

Fu.ck ya I wiN!

Who is better? TFM or the dude from Joisey?

I don't know, but I'd pay $100 for a ringside seat with those two in the Octagon.

You're trying to use Mike the Eunuch logic on me? Is there any reason why someone who spends a good deal of their time handicapping a SINGLE track shouldn't be able to do very nicely, even with the prescratch situation? If I were watching every replay at a single track and following every horse, how many winners do you think I'd pick a week: Beforehand or otherwise? And not just me, just about anybody.

I don't doubt your ability. I just get tired of the same nonsense posts here.

I'm going to give TFM the benefit of the doubt ... and say I'll take TFM minus the points.

TFM would tap out 3 seconds before the match started .... not that I wouldn't either.

I'm here solely to entertain myself ... not you.

For me, this is like masturbation in a way.


Sorry you had to find out this way.

While showing a profit at PID is respectable, lets put it in perspective. Absolutely no serious players are wagering there. The pools are non-existent, especially the win pools. If Albert Pujols played AA ball, he'd bat .500 and win the Triple Crown. Nobody would give a damn.

Did you really take time off for a few months to come back with more penis and jerk off jokes?

Very few people would care even if it was something done at a major circuit - where I don't disagree it would be harder to do.

Having to make selections for every single race - 24 hours in advance - before scratches and without seeing odds ... it's a lot like asking a hitter to swing at every single pitch thrown in every at-bat ... or asking an offense to run a scripted set of plays without having the ability to audible and adjust for defensive schemes, looks, and formations.

No matter what track you're playing - you're placed at a signifcant disadvantage in terms of producing profit when you're denied the ability to pass a race or adjust to situations and current odds.

You're wired a whole lot better than me - but I'd like to see how you would handle a person who runs a racetrack basically telling you that you aren't on par as a handicapper with a ditzy girl who has confused Delaware Park's track symbol in the form, with that of Delta Downs on more than one occasion. That you're handicapping is not on par with a guy who makes a horse off a 7 year layoff, for a 1-for-40 trainer, 3/1 on the morning line. And why this conclusion? Because you're so young and you're local... which is like supposed to translate to 'you can't possibly know anything about anything'

I can't imagine anyone as bitter about the lack of recognition or respect recieved in terms of how complete they are as a handicapper.

I think there are a few guys who are as good - and some of those probably even better - in terms of playing for profit. But that's an entirely different animal than being complete.

I'll spend hours of really breaking down trainers, horses, races, post positions stats, etc of obscure tracks I don't ever intend to play. I'll spend hours of researching time periods that have passed, some have long passed. I'll spend hundreds of hours over the course of a year working on stuff that will gain me an edge on rare occasions that I know others aren't going to bother with.

I think that stuff comes at the expense of short term profits you can make if all that focus was directed that way instead. I'd rather know a little more than maybe put myself in position to bank a little more.

That sucks. I thought I was doing good by turning a profit at the track I play, but I guess not. No "serious players are wagering there", the "pools are non-existent" and nobody gives a damn about the place.

****. I'd better get cracking on 'capping bigger tracks.

I thought DrugS was serious about his penis and jerking off, thanks for clearing up the fact that he is only joking.

lol
:tro::{>::wf

If you are turning a profit at a small track, great. I bet small tracks all the time. However, even the small tracks have bigger pools than PID. Nobody can make any real money over time there, because there is none in the pools. Stevie Wonder can see that. It doesn't mean DrugS isn't a good handicapper, not even close. I could show a monstrous ROI on paper on races here in Oklahoma on at Will Rogers Downs and Fair Meadows, but that is a far cry from winning real money.

As for the penis jokes, maybe you guys could PM each other pictures of each others cocks and have a grand old time. Personally, I think it is pretty childish and I can't believe Steve allows it. It ruins a lot of threads around here.

Like I said in my other post, I know you are a good handicapper, I'm just saying the PID thing probably isn't worth the badge of honor you make it out to be.

As for the other part, I'll take the money. This game is mostly all short term...it constantly changes. When synthetics came out, you could make a killing betting turf horses with good figures. It doesn't work any longer. If you go back and study it over the last five years, it is profitable. But the last 18 months, you would lose.

Yeah because there have never been any ruined threads by over-moderating at PA.

And this post will probably be deleted because heaven forbid you guys receive any criticism.

Your logic is so backwards. If you could show a monstrous ROI on paper at WRD or FMT, WHY AREN'T YOU DOING IT THEN?!??!? If you could make $300 a day "virtually guaranteed" there then ****, go do it. If anything, making a flat win bet profit on a small handle track 24 hours ahead of time is even HARDER because it is more difficult to project closing odds since one moderate bet can move the prices significantly.

:tro:

If you have to ask the question, WHY AREN'T YOU DOING IT THEN?!??!?, then you really don't understand the betting side of the game. Are you even familiar, a little, with the pool sizes of the tracks I mention? If I posted selections in the paper every day for those tracks it is a guarantee I would show a + ROI. If I bet as much as $40 on those selections with real money, it would probably turn to a negative ROI, or at the very least shrink considerably.

I like both boards, so I'm not going to get into a pissing contest about that. I will say more threads get edited or deleted here than at PA. I'm just amazed cock references and masturbation techniques seem to be acceptable.

I'm not up on handle for these smaller tracks, though I do bet PID. Not one of my 'must' tracks, however.

I looked at handle for 3 days:

Date Attendance On Track Handle Off Track Handle
7/01 518 $28,509 $620,747
7/02 823 $38,754 $280,170
7/03 1045 $46,255 $156,972 (why is this so low?)


I'm too lazy to compare these to other smaller tracks. But it appears that it would take more than $40 wagers to turn a profit into a loss. Of course, there are incredible odds swings at this track.

Not to imply that I disgree with your overall premise.

I don't really have the time or inclination to do the math, but the win pools are just a fraction of the overall handle. My point is that it is easier to do because the competition is very weak. There is no point in a big player trying to make serious money at these tracks. To devote a large amount of time to a small track like PID or WRD or LNN makes no sense.

My guess why the 7/3 handle is low is because the smaller tracks face fierce Saturday competition from all the other tracks open Sat. I think FL biggest day is Mon ., for instance.

I agree with your overall premise. I don't buy the competition thing because a strong player should be able to win in just about any environment, and, from experience, PID is not an easy track to beat. Doesn't mean it's hard, either, just that it's 'nuanced' and take a bit of getting used to. My point is that playing a single track, whether large or small, is a dated way of going about it. While some might think that 80 hour weeks spent watching replays and keeping notes (and doing a bunch of other things) is the way to win at the game, I think this is just too much grunt work. Playing a handful of races, at best, a day is not keeping up with the times. I was reading over at your forum where someone wrote that before you can beat multiple tracks you need to be able to beat a single track. This is ridiculously banal but what's lost in this is that it's a lot easier to beat a single track than it is to beat multiple tracks.

I think we agree, but I'm not sure you see the big picture of my argument. There is no point putting in time at those places, not the kind of time required to watch replays and such. Sure, a good player can win, but there is a line where the time involved isn't worth the effort.

A +5% ROI in SoCal or NYRA is on much more solid ground than a 20% ROI at PID or PNL. Because big bettors know this, and by and large big bettors are probably better bettors, they aren't going to waste a lot of effort on these smaller places. Thus, the competition is easier. People can argue theories and what ifs all they want, I have studied and bet the pools at most tracks in the US for nearly a decade.

I don't agree with some of this.

PID would be utterly impossible to beat - at 800 races a meet - for anyone if not for the simple fact that - in all 4 meets so far - some pretty powerful and very legit track biases have lingered on for an extended period of time.

It's also a lot better place than most for people who study trainers intently - and it's also a track that runs it's fair share of 2yo maiden races - and you get a lot of debuters in the 3yo maiden races as well ... which, in terms of having to make selections 24 hour out ... would favor me over others I believe. You don't see a lot of public handicappers pick debuters 10/1 on the ML on top .. and in a lot of cases here, those prove to be very bad ML's and those end up being the right horses.

I've had many of my best days betting on the biggest racing days of the year. Breeders Cup Day, Derby day, etc. I've had some of my best meets at Saratoga and AQU Inner. Belmont Spring is the only NYRA meet where I'd been raped and pillaged on more than one occasion.

Bottom line - if PID is a fair racetrack ... your avg good handicapper is dealing with an extremely unattractive situation. Small fields, a lot of uncompetitive races, a lot of maiden races with debuters, Ness running straight down peoples throats. etc.

It's a cold, cruel world CJ. Have a good cry and wipe your nose.

I'd actually prefer that people not be thin-skinned, piss-stained handwringers about stuff like that...espeically when I know they're not that way.

We are all just animals. Squirrels looking for a nut, Chimps looking for a frog.

There are other places that receive a LNN signal?

Saying I don't understand the betting aspect of the game is pretty LOL funny.

I am very familiar with the pool sizes of PID. Let's do a little exercise here: The last race run had a mutuel pool of $14,219. For argument's sake let's say 50% of that was the win pool ($7,109) and takeout at PID on WPS is 17% ($5,901). The winner went off at 4.4-1, which means he had $1,093 on him to win. Add in your $40 bet ($33 after takeout) to the pool and on the winner and your $10.80 winner drops to $10.60 or $10.40, depending on breakage. That's either -1.8% or -3.6% on a common-priced winner, far from enough to crush your suggested +20% ROI.

FYI, for a $40 bet to depress the odds enough to eradicate a 20% the horse would have to pay over $74. I can guarantee to you anyone betting horses at PID at 36-1 has a permanent bed in the poor house.

How much do you know about betting that you are trying to fool us into thinking 50% of the action is in the win pool?

25% is fair....at best. Suddenly a $40 bet drops the price as much as 60 cents.

But, you have to realize this isn't the entire point. The other part of the point is that the betting crowd isn't sophisticated, which leads to relative overlays, so while in theory you can say this would make it easier to make money, there are still two problems here. One, as was already stated, even minor bets significantly change the prices....and two, the paper ROI is rendered meaningless by both the first reason and the second that there is no sophisticated money in the pools. Both factors that inflate the paper ROI would significantly deflate it in the real world.