Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   Sports Bar & Grill (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Lets hope Halladay is a playoff stud like Lee (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=33243)

Antitrust32 12-14-2009 04:01 PM

Lets hope Halladay is a playoff stud like Lee
 
Phillies getting Halladay and trading Cliff Lee. Aparently, the Phillies were not getting anywhere with Lee in extention talks, and Lee was going to test the FA market after next season.

Phillies would have about a 0% chance of signing Lee in FA and Lee was asking for $23m per year and no home team discount.

This deal is based on a multi-year deal with Halladay.

As much as it saddens me to see Cliff Lee go.. If he wasnt going to sign long term, getting Halladay for 3-4 years is the right deal.

Besides, at last years mid season trade deadline.. nobody was saying Cliff Lee was the best pitcher in baseball.. that accolade went to Halladay.

I just hope Halladay can do even 75% as good as Lee in the playoffs.

Its a given if he stays healthy Halladay is going to tear up the NL.

Cannon Shell 12-15-2009 03:25 PM

Id like to see the actual deal

MaTH716 12-16-2009 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
Phillies getting Halladay and trading Cliff Lee. Aparently, the Phillies were not getting anywhere with Lee in extention talks, and Lee was going to test the FA market after next season.

Phillies would have about a 0% chance of signing Lee in FA and Lee was asking for $23m per year and no home team discount.

This deal is based on a multi-year deal with Halladay.

As much as it saddens me to see Cliff Lee go.. If he wasnt going to sign long term, getting Halladay for 3-4 years is the right deal.

Besides, at last years mid season trade deadline.. nobody was saying Cliff Lee was the best pitcher in baseball.. that accolade went to Halladay.

I just hope Halladay can do even 75% as good as Lee in the playoffs.

Its a given if he stays healthy Halladay is going to tear up the NL.

Reguardless, they are still in the same spot. Substitute Halladay for Lee and they win the same amount of games in the Series. Now if they were able to get Roy and not trade Lee that would be a horse of a different color. Going forward it's a good move because they are upgrading the spot slightly (Lee was excellent for them but I think Halladay is a better pitcher) and locking up Halladay for 4 years. But they are still in the same position with the rest of the staff. Not to mention what the closer situation will be.
Who knows, Happ could be a stud but I have to see more out of him after Charlie Manuel didn't have enough faith to pitch him in the series. I guess Hamels could rebound after last year. Blanton, is mediocore. Then you have Pedro and Moyer. It just seems like they didn't need to address the #1, it was the depth that needed fixing. Plus they lost Drabek too (not sure about the prospects they are getting).

Antitrust32 12-16-2009 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716
Reguardless, they are still in the same spot. Substitute Halladay for Lee and they win the same amount of games in the Series. Now if they were able to get Roy and not trade Lee that would be a horse of a different color. Going forward it's a good move because they are upgrading the spot slightly (Lee was excellent for them but I think Halladay is a better pitcher) and locking up Halladay for 4 years. But they are still in the same position with the rest of the staff. Not to mention what the closer situation will be.
Who knows, Happ could be a stud but I have to see more out of him after Charlie Manuel didn't have enough faith to pitch him in the series. I guess Hamels could rebound after last year. Blanton, is mediocore. Then you have Pedro and Moyer. It just seems like they didn't need to address the #1, it was the depth that needed fixing. Plus they lost Drabek too (not sure about the prospects they are getting).

i agree the only difference in the playoffs is Roy can go 3 games in a 7 game series and Phils wouldnt do that with Lee.

They are really basing this move on a faith in cole hamels, he's the key. if he becomes the 2008 version having hamels pitch 3 games and roy 3 in a 7 game series is tough.

Cliff Lee is only $9 mil next year. Its unbelievable on the philly message boards the fans are begging ownership to just charge $3 more per ticket and pay for Lee. LOL

Gander 12-16-2009 12:30 PM

The Phillies are still by far the 2nd best team in baseball and its going to take a lot from somebody else to have a different world series matchup next year. I can't remember a time when the 1 and 2 teams are this much better than the rest. They may as well start selling tickets now.

MaTH716 12-16-2009 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gander
The Phillies are still by far the 2nd best team in baseball and its going to take a lot from somebody else to have a different world series matchup next year. I can't remember a time when the 1 and 2 teams are this much better than the rest. They may as well start selling tickets now.

I think the Red Sox have addressed a need and probably will make at least one more major move. Something like re-signing Bay or trading for Adrian Gonzalez. They have some trading chips so I do think something else will be done. The Yanks need another arm, I'm just not sold on Joba or Hughes going back into the rotation. Add that to Andy Pettite who's not getting any younger and it could end up dooming them this year.

Gander 12-16-2009 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716
I think the Red Sox have addressed a need and probably will make at least one more major move. Something like re-signing Bay or trading for Adrian Gonzalez. They have some trading chips so I do think something else will be done. The Yanks need another arm, I'm just not sold on Joba or Hughes going back into the rotation. Add that to Andy Pettite who's not getting any younger and it could end up dooming them this year.

Red Sox are pretty much officially out of the Bay chase, and that really stinks because they need hitters, specifically power hitters. They arent going to beat the Yankees with singles! I like their pitching rotation slightly better than the Yankees but not enough to think at this point they are any better than a 2nd place team. As far as Joba goes, I think hes a better reliever. I dont think he has the temperment to be a starter and you take away his raw power of just coming in and throwing 15-20 pitches and he becomes incredibly average.

SniperSB23 12-16-2009 04:41 PM

I can't believe they gave Lee up to not pay him $9 million. If Seattle falls out of contention they will get better prospects trading Lee at the All Star break then the Phillies gave up in trading him now. Really strange and cheap move, don't get it at all. Could have understood it if they had to give up Lee to keep Taylor and Drabek but can't understand it in this context.

Antitrust32 12-16-2009 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
I can't believe they gave Lee up to not pay him $9 million. If Seattle falls out of contention they will get better prospects trading Lee at the All Star break then the Phillies gave up in trading him now. Really strange and cheap move, don't get it at all. Could have understood it if they had to give up Lee to keep Taylor and Drabek but can't understand it in this context.


i agree. 9 freaking million is nothing for a player like Cliff Lee.

If anything they would get two draft picks for him at FA next year.

All because they were fuc.king idiots and gave Jamie Moyer a 2 year 18 mil deal.

Just man up and pay 9 mil. You had 102% attendence for the year PLUS playoff home games. They can afford it.

Bad move but they said they needed to do it to fill up a depleted minor league system.. which was one of the best last year and now had nobody but Dominic Brown and this Phillipe canadian pitcher dude.

Way to be cheapo's!

NTamm1215 12-16-2009 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
i agree. 9 freaking million is nothing for a player like Cliff Lee.

If anything they would get two draft picks for him at FA next year.

All because they were fuc.king idiots and gave Jamie Moyer a 2 year 18 mil deal.

Just man up and pay 9 mil. You had 102% attendence for the year PLUS playoff home games. They can afford it.

Bad move but they said they needed to do it to fill up a depleted minor league system.. which was one of the best last year and now had nobody but Dominic Brown and this Phillipe canadian pitcher dude.

Way to be cheapo's!

Didn't it also have something to do with their chances of re-signing Lee after next year? I guess the idea of getting Halladay now before you have to potentially overpay in free agency won out.

Kyle Drabek has already had Tommy John surgery, so one has to wonder if he might just be a #3 prospect, as Tim Kurkjian said on ESPN this morning.

It seemed like Halladay was basically begging them to trade for him and I'm confident he's a better pitcher than Cliff Lee.

NT

SniperSB23 12-16-2009 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215
Didn't it also have something to do with their chances of re-signing Lee after next year? I guess the idea of getting Halladay now before you have to potentially overpay in free agency won out.

Kyle Drabek has already had Tommy John surgery, so one has to wonder if he might just be a #3 prospect, as Tim Kurkjian said on ESPN this morning.

It seemed like Halladay was basically begging them to trade for him and I'm confident he's a better pitcher than Cliff Lee.

NT

If all goes well with Halladay he'll be there for 4 years $80 million. I have a hard time believing the Phillies would have had any difficulty getting an extension with Lee if they were willing to talk those sort of numbers. Wouldn't you rather pay Halladay money to Lee and keep your prospects? 6'6" 250 lb guys that can run the bases and don't strike out often don't grow on trees.

Cheapest part of this deal is that the Phillies got $6 million from the Blue Jays in it. If anything they should cut prices to their season ticket holders for being so cheap.

horseofcourse 12-16-2009 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
If all goes well with Halladay he'll be there for 4 years $80 million. I have a hard time believing the Phillies would have had any difficulty getting an extension with Lee if they were willing to talk those sort of numbers. Wouldn't you rather pay Halladay money to Lee and keep your prospects? 6'6" 250 lb guys that can run the bases and don't strike out often don't grow on trees.

Cheapest part of this deal is that the Phillies got $6 million from the Blue Jays in it. If anything they should cut prices to their season ticket holders for being so cheap.

I think the Phillies did the right thing. Halladay is better than Lee despite what Lee did in the post season last year. Halladay was willing to sign long term...Lee wasn't. My guess is Lee wouldn't have signed with the Phillies. The Mariners got a good pitcher cheap for one year and are legitimate contenders this year with Felix/Lee 1-2 in the rotation. And if it doesn't work, the Mariners can get prospects back that they traded for Lee at the trading deadline. It made sense all the way around for all teams.

Antitrust32 12-17-2009 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NTamm1215
Didn't it also have something to do with their chances of re-signing Lee after next year? I guess the idea of getting Halladay now before you have to potentially overpay in free agency won out.

Kyle Drabek has already had Tommy John surgery, so one has to wonder if he might just be a #3 prospect, as Tim Kurkjian said on ESPN this morning.

It seemed like Halladay was basically begging them to trade for him and I'm confident he's a better pitcher than Cliff Lee.

NT

Yes, but the Lee trade to Seattle ended up having no players from that go to Toronto, so they could have got Halladay anyway.

Even if your chances on signing Lee next year are slim, if you wait and trade him during the season at the trading deadline I bet you'd get better prospects... and even if you just lose him next year you still get two draft picks cause he's a type A free agent.

And 9 million gets you Halladay, Lee, Hamels, Happ as your rotation for a whole year and a clear favorite to win the world series.

They Phillies staff said they had to make the trade to fill up their now depleted farm.

MaTH716 12-17-2009 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
Yes, but the Lee trade to Seattle ended up having no players from that go to Toronto, so they could have got Halladay anyway.

Even if your chances on signing Lee next year are slim, if you wait and trade him during the season at the trading deadline I bet you'd get better prospects... and even if you just lose him next year you still get two draft picks cause he's a type A free agent.

And 9 million gets you Halladay, Lee, Hamels, Happ as your rotation for a whole year and a clear favorite to win the world series.

They Phillies staff said they had to make the trade to fill up their now depleted farm.

Yeah, but if gets hurt or stinks they would be screwed. Also if they were for some reason out of the playoff race (which is most unlikely) then they would be the team getting leveraged. If they were in it, they would simply keep him.
All that being said, with the team that they have I would have kept Lee and went for it. They are built to win now, I'll worry about the future/prospects 2 years from now.

SCUDSBROTHER 12-17-2009 11:23 AM

The reason they didn't get one nice overlapping year with a minimum of 2 allstar starting pitchers is what? :$: , or :zz: The rest of the league would like to thank the Philly management.

Cannon Shell 12-17-2009 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER
The reason they didn't get one nice overlapping year with a minimum of 2 allstar starting pitchers is what? :$: , or :zz: The rest of the league would like to thank the Philly management.

99% :$: . The prospects they got back for Lee are not top of the line guys. The fact that Toronto gave them $6 million in the trade makes it even more unforgivable.

Sniper-zero chance lee signs a deal like Halladay did. He is going to want a long term deal with a whole lot more guaranteed money. Halladay's signing for a far below market rate may be the bigest surprise of all.

Smooth Operator 12-18-2009 08:04 AM

Looks like Amaro and Montgomery are developing the same LOSER mentality that the local pro football team with ZERO rings has.


UNBELIEVABLE



REAL Philly sports fans wanted them to find a way to keep you in red and white, Cliff.

Thanks for that STELLAR performance last season.

Good luck, bro…

MaTH716 12-18-2009 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator
Looks like Amaro and Montgomery are developing the same LOSER mentality that the local pro football team with ZERO rings has.


UNBELIEVABLE



REAL Philly sports fans wanted them to find a way to keep you in red and white, Cliff.

Thanks for that STELLAR performance last season.

Good luck, bro…

Don't Fret Smooth dude, at least you still have USC!

Oh Wait.........................

















THUD!

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator
Looks like Amaro and Montgomery are developing the same LOSER mentality that the local pro football team with ZERO rings has.


UNBELIEVABLE



REAL Philly sports fans wanted them to find a way to keep you in red and white, Cliff.

Thanks for that STELLAR performance last season.

Good luck, bro…


You know what Booth, you really have no clue dont you?

Comparing the Phillies to the Eagles is an insult to everyone in Red. So they traded a guy they werent going to be able to sign and helped rebuild the farm. they also signed THE BEST PITCHER IN BASEBALL for the next FOUR years!!!!

It would have been incredible to keep Lee... the screwed up by givng Moyer a two year contract. **** happens. We have Polanco instead of Feliz. At this very moment we are a slightly BETTER team than last year... oh by the way we won the past two pennants and a world series. and we are better now. Roy Halladay is every teams wet dream and he's a proven AL East Killer.

So while of course all of us fans would have loved to keep Lee.. that means we would NOT have Halladay (they werent going to do the deal without getting some prospects back). and in 2011 Hamels would be our #1 guy and we'd have no Lee or Halladay.

Get a grip.. dont get so tough on the team who is the best in the NL and the favorites to go back to the series the THIRD time in a row!

SniperSB23 12-18-2009 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716
Yeah, but if gets hurt or stinks they would be screwed. Also if they were for some reason out of the playoff race (which is most unlikely) then they would be the team getting leveraged. If they were in it, they would simply keep him.
All that being said, with the team that they have I would have kept Lee and went for it. They are built to win now, I'll worry about the future/prospects 2 years from now.

You mean as opposed to if that happens with Halladay!!! Halladay gets hit by a bus tomorrow and is in a wheelchair the rest of his life and they are out $60 million plus the buyout for the option. That happens to Cliff Lee and they are out $9 million. You can't justify certain moves on the worst case scenario while ignoring the worst case scenario for other moves.

SniperSB23 12-18-2009 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
So while of course all of us fans would have loved to keep Lee.. that means we would NOT have Halladay (they werent going to do the deal without getting some prospects back). and in 2011 Hamels would be our #1 guy and we'd have no Lee or Halladay.

What would have prevented the Phillies from signing Halladay as a free agent in 2011?

Smooth Operator 12-18-2009 01:06 PM

Spin this HORRIBLE call any way you want, Antichrist32


When they have a real shot to get two rings in three years … winners GO FOR IT with everything they have!!!

They don't stand around like a couple of little girls worrying about "the future".



UNBELIEVEABLE that they could let this guy go


Khrist, is this Reid-Lurie all over again??????????????????

MaTH716 12-18-2009 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
You mean as opposed to if that happens with Halladay!!! Halladay gets hit by a bus tomorrow and is in a wheelchair the rest of his life and they are out $60 million plus the buyout for the option. That happens to Cliff Lee and they are out $9 million. You can't justify certain moves on the worst case scenario while ignoring the worst case scenario for other moves.

I was responding soley to the point Aunty made about waiting to the deadline thinking that they would have gotten more for Lee if they traded him then. Also I mentioned that for some reason they stunk they probably would have gotten less for him also, so it wasn't only a look at the worst case scenario.
Personally like I stated I would have rolled the dice and tried to keep them both for this season. Possibly making it back/winning the World Series would offset losing Lee for nothing. They should have went for it.

SniperSB23 12-18-2009 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716
I was responding soley to the point Aunty made about waiting to the deadline thinking that they would have gotten more for Lee if they traded him then. Also I mentioned that for some reason they stunk they probably would have gotten less for him also, so it wasn't only a look at the worst case scenario.
Personally like I stated I would have rolled the dice and tried to keep them both for this season. Possibly making it back/winning the World Series would offset losing Lee for nothing. They should have went for it.

The main problem is I think the $6 million the Phillies got for Lee is worth far more than the 3 prospects they got from Seattle. If they got Ackley or Saunders it would have been one thing but the three guys they got are not even remotely close to the top 50 prospects in the nation. You don't give up Cliff Lee for that to save $9 million and get another $6 million in cash. That is just a kick in the balls to your season ticket holders. They didn't refuel their minor league system, all they did was put $15 million into their pockets in exchange for giving up World Series favoritism.

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
What would have prevented the Phillies from signing Halladay as a free agent in 2011?


would have cost us more $$ then...

come on now. Signing Halladay right now for Drabeck and Taylor was a TERRIFIC move for the Phillies. An absolute steal for the extension also (if 20mill per year can possibly be a steal)

The trade in question is the Lee trade. Obviously the fans wanted it NOT to happen. I dont think Amaro really wanted it to happen but nobody wanted Blanton and we made the mistake with Moyer.

We are still a better team now than we were last year. Halladay is > Lee (though not by too much).

Only in Philly can people complain when they just landed the best pitcher in baseball!

I'm not too upset, excited to have Halladay.. bummed about Lee moving but if he wants to "retire as a Phillie" like he said yesterday he can come take less $ from us next year!

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator
Spin this HORRIBLE call any way you want, Antichrist32


When they have a real shot to get two rings in three years … winners GO FOR IT with everything they have!!!

They don't stand around like a couple of little girls worrying about "the future".



UNBELIEVEABLE that they could let this guy go


Khrist, is this Reid-Lurie all over again??????????????????


We have just as good of a shot to get back there next year as we did last year. What, you think by adding Halladay and Polanco now we are going to miss the playoffs?? (granted anything can happen)

We are a BETTER TEAM RIGHT NOW THAN THE PAST TWO BACK TO BACK NL PENNANT WINNING TEAMS

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
The main problem is I think the $6 million the Phillies got for Lee is worth far more than the 3 prospects they got from Seattle. If they got Ackley or Saunders it would have been one thing but the three guys they got are not even remotely close to the top 50 prospects in the nation. You don't give up Cliff Lee for that to save $9 million and get another $6 million in cash. That is just a kick in the balls to your season ticket holders. They didn't refuel their minor league system, all they did was put $15 million into their pockets in exchange for giving up World Series favoritism.


People forget that Halladay can pitch on 3 days rest (go 3 of 7 in a 7 game series) and we have upgraded our 3rd base.

We HAVE to be the favorites to get back to the series, and we are better off now with Halladay.

& the Phils have said all along that they dont want their salary to be above 140mil. They stuck to it. I really cant be upset with this move or this team after the past two years.

As much as I wish they would have kept Lee for one more year.. they did the right thing in getting Halladay.

MaTH716 12-18-2009 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
People forget that Halladay can pitch on 3 days rest (go 3 of 7 in a 7 game series) and we have upgraded our 3rd base.

We HAVE to be the favorites to get back to the series, and we are better off now with Halladay.

Two question marks, back end of the rotation and Brad Lidge. The Phills are a very talented team, but are they going to have to depend on the two headed monster of Martinez/Moyer to give them clutch innings down the stretch? Also which Brett Myers will show up or will he be back in the pen? Then there is Hamels.......Finally, who will be closing games for them come September? If he is anything like he was in his first season then you should feel pretty confident. If he's like the guy from last year, then you might encounter some real problems.
I think they are a very talented team, but I'm really not sure you can state that they are better right now, then teams that won and went to the series the last 2 seasons.

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716
Two question marks, back end of the rotation and Brad Lidge. The Phills are a very talented team, but are they going to have to depend on the two headed monster of Martinez/Moyer to give them clutch innings down the stretch? Also which Brett Myers will show up or will he be back in the pen? Then there is Hamels.......Finally, who will be closing games for them come September? If he is anything like he was in his first season then you should feel pretty confident. If he's like the guy from last year, then you might encounter some real problems.
I think they are a very talented team, but I'm really not sure you can state that they are better right now, then teams that won and went to the series the last 2 seasons.

How the heck are they not better than last year?? Polanco is a upgrade over Feliz and Halladay is a slight upgrade over Lee. Other than that we are exactly the same.. except our bench is a lot BETTER than last year. (our bench went something like 1/32 in the whole post season last year.. not good)

I expect Happ to be freaking awesome again this year.. (glad they traded Drebeck and not Happ)

the 5th starter and some bullpen guys need to be figured out.

I really wouldnt be surprised to see them make another mid season trade for another starter like they've done the past two years.

Lidge sucked last year and we still ran away with the Pennant. He cant possibly be any worse. And if he sucks just as bad and Manuel puts him in as closer in the Post Season AGAIn than Manuel should be fired.

Hamels also cant possibly be any worse than last year. Amaro is really basing this trade around Hamels being 2008 Hamels. I'm not confident but am hopefull.

Myers is not on this team anymore.

Look to see them pick up a Smoltz type guy and another bullpen pitcher who can close if needed.

Also we need to sign Chan Ho Park and Durbin.. big time.

MaTH716 12-18-2009 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
How the heck are they not better than last year?? Polanco is a upgrade over Feliz and Halladay is a slight upgrade over Lee. Other than that we are exactly the same.. except our bench is a lot BETTER than last year. (our bench went something like 1/32 in the whole post season last year.. not good)

I expect Happ to be freaking awesome again this year.. (glad they traded Drebeck and not Happ)

the 5th starter and some bullpen guys need to be figured out.

I really wouldnt be surprised to see them make another mid season trade for another starter like they've done the past two years.

Lidge sucked last year and we still ran away with the Pennant. He cant possibly be any worse. And if he sucks just as bad and Manuel puts him in as closer in the Post Season AGAIn than Manuel should be fired.

Hamels also cant possibly be any worse than last year. Amaro is really basing this trade around Hamels being 2008 Hamels. I'm not confident but am hopefull.

Myers is not on this team anymore.

Look to see them pick up a Smoltz type guy and another bullpen pitcher who can close if needed.

Also we need to sign Chan Ho Park and Durbin.. big time.

Granted Polonco is an upgrade. Halladay is also an upgrade, but you already had a guy in that spot who was comparable (Halladay is better but Lee was no slouch, either way you had a #1 stud/ace).
I agree with you about Happ, he could turn out to be a good one.
But I just think you are basing the rest on the fact that they came close to winning it again last year, with several of the guys just having awful seasons. So you automatically think that they will be a better team this year because they can't play any worse than they did last season. But what if those guys regress again?
I'm not saying that they aren't a good team, but there are obvious question marks reguarding their pitching that warrents consideration.

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaTH716
Granted Polonco is an upgrade. Halladay is also an upgrade, but you already had a guy in that spot who was comparable (Halladay is better but Lee was no slouch, either way you had a #1 stud/ace).
I agree with you about Happ, he could turn out to be a good one.
But I just think you are basing the rest on the fact that they came close to winning it again last year, with several of the guys just having awful seasons. So you automatically think that they will be a better team this year because they can't play any worse than they did last season. But what if those guys regress again?
I'm not saying that they aren't a good team, but there are obvious question marks reguarding their pitching that warrents consideration.


Can Lidge and Hamels possibly regress any further? I guess Lidge could blow every save he's involved in.. but you really cant get any worse than those two did given their talent.

Hamels pitched tons of innings in 2008, he won the WS MVP and then was involved in a lot of extra activites on the off season. He admitted he wasnt in shape when spring training started AND he was nagged with injuries all year. He may not be the 2008 Hamels, but he WILL be better than 2009 Hamels this upcoming year.

We will be picking up more pitchers before the season starts, and we have some guys on our Farm that could do okay in the pen.

I am basing my statement of us being better on the fact that our lineup is better than last year, our bench is better than last year, and our #1 pitcher is better than last year. Our 2-5 pitching and pen will end up being at least equal but most likely better than last year.


Also, I was really responding to idiot Booth Operator who's a complete dumbass and knows nothing about sports. How he can root for Philly teams and then root for USC is beyond me. How he thinks getting Roy Halladay makes the Phils "like the eagles" is also beyond me. Booth should be a Cowboys/Mutts fan not a Philly fan.

SniperSB23 12-18-2009 03:11 PM

The Rockies went to the World Series in 2007, improved in the offseason and finished 14 games under .500 the next season. The NL is always so balanced without the elite teams so whoever gets hot down the stretch winds up in the World Series. The Phillies had a chance to completely offset that and become the elite National League team and opted for $15 million and some second rate prospects instead. It's a cheap move, plain and simple. They remain a top contender in the National League but they could have been THE contender.

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
The Rockies went to the World Series in 2007, improved in the offseason and finished 14 games under .500 the next season. The NL is always so balanced without the elite teams so whoever gets hot down the stretch winds up in the World Series. The Phillies had a chance to completely offset that and become the elite National League team and opted for $15 million and some second rate prospects instead. It's a cheap move, plain and simple. They remain a top contender in the National League but they could have been THE contender.


They will be the preseason favorite for the NL easily. And in the top 3 favs to win the Series out of all of baseball. Any team that goes to back to back WS is an elite team. We have some clutch hitters that love to be in the big spots. That seperates us from other contenders (like the Rockies)

I completely agree that trading Lee was a cheap move and should not have been done. But people keep forgetting that we do have the BEST pitcher in baseball now.

If we kept Lee and none of these trades happened nobody would be down on the Phillies. They made some moves that not only make us better next year but for the next 4 years. They did the right thing getting Halladay. If Lee needed to be sacrificed to get Halladay it was the right move. I really wish they would have man upped and paid Lee his 9 mil. But hey, I'm not going to be as greedy as Yankee fans.

Its not going to be easy to get to a 3rd straight World Series. I'm not sure if its been done with an NL team in the history of baseball.. and if it has it was 50+ years ago. But we are in the right position to make that run.

remember our lineup is still going to be:

Rollins, Polanco, Utley, Howard, Werth, Ibanez, Victorino, Ruiz. Best lineup in baseball. If they were smart they'd put Victorino in the leadoff spot and Rollins in the 7th spot but they have this thing with loyalty that sometimes goes too far (pitching Lidge in the WS).

Smooth Operator 12-18-2009 03:32 PM

Of course they cheaped out, Sniper

It was a bush-league call … like we've come to expect from the ringless 'geniuses' who run the show with the football team.

Spin-maestro losers like Antichrist32 always have a tough time handling the truth...

SniperSB23 12-18-2009 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
They will be the preseason favorite for the NL easily. And in the top 3 favs to win the Series out of all of baseball. Any team that goes to back to back WS is an elite team. We have some clutch hitters that love to be in the big spots. That seperates us from other contenders (like the Rockies)

I completely agree that trading Lee was a cheap move and should not have been done. But people keep forgetting that we do have the BEST pitcher in baseball now.

If we kept Lee and none of these trades happened nobody would be down on the Phillies. They made some moves that not only make us better next year but for the next 4 years. They did the right thing getting Halladay. If Lee needed to be sacrificed to get Halladay it was the right move. I really wish they would have man upped and paid Lee his 9 mil. But hey, I'm not going to be as greedy as Yankee fans.

Its not going to be easy to get to a 3rd straight World Series. I'm not sure if its been done with an NL team in the history of baseball.. and if it has it was 50+ years ago. But we are in the right position to make that run.

remember our lineup is still going to be:

Rollins, Polanco, Utley, Howard, Werth, Ibanez, Victorino, Ruiz. Best lineup in baseball. If they were smart they'd put Victorino in the leadoff spot and Rollins in the 7th spot but they have this thing with loyalty that sometimes goes too far (pitching Lidge in the WS).

If you gave me the over/under on games played in 2010 with the line set as their games played in 2009 I would bet the under on all of them and make a lot of money. No one stays that healthy two years in a row, especially not when they played additional games in the postseason.

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
If you gave me the over/under on games played in 2010 with the line set as their games played in 2009 I would bet the under on all of them and make a lot of money. No one stays that healthy two years in a row, especially not when they played additional games in the postseason.


Utley and Ibanez were both hurt at certain times last year

As well as Hamels and other pitchers.

I'm not making predictions based on assuming guys will get injured. There are steriods to make you heal better as well. ;)

And we picked up a bench guy who will be able to give Rollins and Utley more games off in 2010.

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smooth Operator
Of course they cheaped out, Sniper

It was a bush-league call … like we've come to expect from the ringless 'geniuses' who run the show with the football team.

Spin-maestro losers like Antichrist32 always have a tough time handling the truth...


The truth being that we are still the team to beat in the NL?


The Eagles are nothing like the Phillies. the Phillies have guys who LOVE clutch situations, the Eagles have guys that puke.

What the f is your problem?

Do you think Halladay sucks or something?

You sound like a Yankee fan.

SniperSB23 12-18-2009 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antitrust32
Utley and Ibanez were both hurt at certain times last year

As well as Hamels and other pitchers.

I'm not making predictions based on assuming guys will get injured. There are steriods to make you heal better as well. ;)

And we picked up a bench guy who will be able to give Rollins and Utley more games off in 2010.

Utley played 156 games last year. Ibanez played 134 which is a lot to expect from him next year at his age. And yes, steroids do help them heal. The Mets need to get that guy that was supplying everyone in the Mitchell Report back.

Antitrust32 12-18-2009 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
Utley played 156 games last year. Ibanez played 134 which is a lot to expect from him next year at his age. And yes, steroids do help them heal. The Mets need to get that guy that was supplying everyone in the Mitchell Report back.

Ibanez had a great 1st half of the season.. maybe in the top 3 best in baseball, got hurt and was not the same after that.

Utley played 156 games because there was noone competent to replace him a few games. We fixed that. He has a bad hip. He just plays hurt alot. Tough as nails.

Cannon Shell 12-18-2009 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SniperSB23
The main problem is I think the $6 million the Phillies got for Lee is worth far more than the 3 prospects they got from Seattle. If they got Ackley or Saunders it would have been one thing but the three guys they got are not even remotely close to the top 50 prospects in the nation. You don't give up Cliff Lee for that to save $9 million and get another $6 million in cash. That is just a kick in the balls to your season ticket holders. They didn't refuel their minor league system, all they did was put $15 million into their pockets in exchange for giving up World Series favoritism.

:$: :$:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.