![]() |
5/1 (CD): Kentucky Oaks (G1)
Kentucky Oaks field
(PP, Horse, Jockey) 1. Tweeter, M.Mena 2. Be Fair, R.Bejarano 3. Stone Legacy, K.Desormeaux 4. Gabby's Golden Gal, V.Espinoza 5. Justwhistledixie, J.Leparoux 6. Rachel Alexandra, C.Borel 7. Nan, C.Nakatani 8. Flying Spur, G.Gomez |
here's your proof.....http://www.drf.com/news/article/103330.html
|
Quote:
|
I see the top 3 as:
Rachel Alexandra Justwhistledixie Flying Spur Do you think this tri will pay anything? |
Quote:
|
no no she was looking for the 1 dollar tri option in which case its
6.20 |
Quote:
|
Seems that this may be a just watch race - maybe do the oaks/derby double
|
Rachel Draws Post Six
Rachel Alexandra Draws Post Six for KY Oaks
Updated: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:11 PM Posted: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 12:00 PM Email Print RSS ShareThisPost positions, trainers and jockeys for the May 1st Kentucky Oaks: Pgm. # Horse Trainer Jockey Morning Line 1 Tweeter D. Wayne Lukas Miguel Mena 30-1 2 Be Fair D. Wayne Lukas Rafael Bejarano 15-1 3 Stone Legacy D. Wayne Lukas Kent Desormeaux 30-1 4 Gabby's Golden Gal Bob Baffert Victor Espinoza 10-1 5 Justwhistledixie Kiaran McLaughlin Julien Leparoux 5-2 6 Rachel Alexandra Hal Wiggins Calvin Borel 3-5 7 Nan Craig Dollase Corey Nakatani 20-1 8 Flying Spur Bill Mott Garrett Gomez 8-1 |
The big money is made when the favorite runs out. Spend a little more with the mind set that you may take a loss on a winning ticket. If things break your way you may hit a windfall. A single of RA in the win spot on a Tri would be a huge waste.
|
Just checked my TV listing to make sure I have BRAVO!
thank goodness... channel #57... Oaks is going BIGTIME! |
Quote:
NT |
Quote:
|
The way everyone is talking, she may be 1-5 when the load the gate.
|
Quote:
1:2 tops |
Quote:
she should be 1 - 1,000,000 shes so much better than everyone else, including the males (imo) now I'll knock on wood |
Interesting that Leparoux is on Justwhistledixie. From what I understood that was only his mount in the Bonnie Miss because Garcia was in Dubai.
NT |
Quote:
|
If you believe anyone can beat Justwhistledixie or Flying Spur for 2nd or 3rd, I agree that money can be made here.
|
Quote:
I said TOPS... you never know how all the people who only bet on big days are going to bet. 1:2 is a possibility, 2:5 is more likely. I'm going to play a small Oaks/ Derby Double. I know you are kidding, but I can't "empty my wallet" in even a one horse race at 1:2 or less. |
Quote:
|
I guess it was too much to ask for the Oaks card to be out before 3:30.
|
Quote:
NT |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Don't they usually get the Derby card, without the Derby, out much earlier? I hope so, as I have to film shows early Thursday morning covering both days stakes, and I really don't feel like staying up all night looking at them. At least I finished Belmont up through Friday. |
Got the desired result.....opened my mouth and the entries came up.
They made 3:30. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A 1x 4 x All only costs 24 bucks. A 1 x All x All is 42 bucks. If RA wins I don't see the payoff > 100 bucks regardless of who finishes second. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NT |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They really put together a great card. The Alysheba is fascinating...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Don't forget to key him for 7th in the septafecta. He sucks. |
Quote:
That leaves Dr. Pleasure and Bullsbay. Dr. Pleasure, I liked both his races at GP, this is probably a good spot for him to break through as the likely pacesetter by default- Cool Coal Man probably won't go since it's pretty clear where he does his best running- and there's no other horse in here with a ton of early speed. Bullsbay, who knows what happened in the Donn? Clearly it wasn't physical because he wheeled back 2 weeks later and won. Draw a line through that and you have a legitimate contender at a good price, who does have tactical speed, is 2-2 at CD and 3-3 at the distance. I feel very comfortable standing with those two. Tell me what I'm missing here. |
You are dismissing horses with form, whether it is as good as some might think or not, for a horse with no ability. Bullsbay sucks. Did you take a close look at his last race? I don't think so....or you wouldn't be picking him. The Hal's Hope? Come on. Bribon didn't show.....and the rest of the field was hopeless. Look who was 3rd. Would you like him here? I guess you're betting him in the Belmont 8th on Friday.
Like him or not, Mambo in Seattle has run on two synthetic tracks and two sloppy tracks since the Travers, so intimating that he hasn't had excuses in those races is wrong. Now, he might get a wet track on Friday, but otherwise he has a license to beat these. Cool Coal Man was not particularly good last time....but he may be pretty loose here. He's certainly a better horse than Bullsbay ( as, of course, is Mambo....at least on a dry track ). You think Macho Again is a deep closer? I don't. Now, he may move up in the wet, but he's also a better horse than Bullsbay. Ready Set does suck....he still may be better than Bullsbay. I have little interest in the others. Frankly....I don't have a great deal of interest in the race. I just think Bullsbay is a joke. But, hey, if he's 15:1, good luck. Don't let me talk you off of him. |
The Hal's Hope was a much better race than you're giving it credit for. Bribon didn't show up, agreed, although that seems to be his MO in graded stakes. Would you like the pacesetter in that race in here? What about It's a Bird, who got buried?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.