Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   flower alley nothing special (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2806)

Exceller 08-05-2006 04:54 PM

flower alley nothing special
 
i have been reading all of the nonsene posted on this board about this horse by the so called experts adn how great he is. that horse is nothing special. a fraud if you ask me. Invasor and Bernardini are much better than anything else. poor Sun King. I hope he gets up one day because he deserves it.

Cajungator26 08-05-2006 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
i have been reading all of the nonsene posted on this board about this horse by the so called experts. that horse is nothing special. a fraud.

Wouldn't call him a fraud, but he definitely didn't run his race today. I think he's still running.

miraja2 08-05-2006 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
i have been reading all of the nonsene posted on this board about this horse by the so called experts adn how great he is. that horse is nothing special. a fraud if you ask me. Invasor and Bernardini are much better than anything else. poor Sun King. I hope he gets up one day because he deserves it.

This horse is a tough one to figure sometimes, but I certainly would NOT call him a fraud. If he comes out of this race healthy I wouldn't write him off yet. After winning the Jim Dandy and the Travers last year he ran a clunker like this in the JCGC before rebounding in the BCC. He might not be done just yet.

Exceller 08-05-2006 05:00 PM

he is no ghostzapper and if you want to take off half of the year and be a horse of the year candidate you better show me more than that.

Dunbar 08-05-2006 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
i have been reading all of the nonsene posted on this board about this horse by the so called experts adn how great he is. that horse is nothing special. a fraud if you ask me. Invasor and Bernardini are much better than anything else. poor Sun King. I hope he gets up one day because he deserves it.

You know, it's a lot easier to say a horse is "nothing special" after a poor performance than before it.

--Dunbar

Cajungator26 08-05-2006 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunbar
You know, it's a lot easier to say a horse is "nothing special" after a poor performance than before it.

--Dunbar

I've been saying it and have been made fun of because of it. Either way, the horse is not a fraud. He just ran a clunker today. Unfortunately, he can't afford to run clunkers like that and be taken seriously for HOY.

Bold Brooklynite 08-05-2006 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
i have been reading all of the nonsene posted on this board about this horse by the so called experts adn how great he is. that horse is nothing special. a fraud if you ask me. Invasor and Bernardini are much better than anything else. poor Sun King. I hope he gets up one day because he deserves it.

You're never as good as you look when you win ...

... or as bad as you look when you lose.

Nonetheless ... Flower Alley was ... and is ... vastly overrated.

It's the Pletcher goo-goo factor at work.

Exceller 08-05-2006 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunbar
You know, it's a lot easier to say a horse is "nothing special" after a poor performance than before it.

--Dunbar

i never thought he was anything special. a lot of "experts" have been saying he only needs to race 4 times because he is this great horse. invasor is a tested horse that runs.

Exceller 08-05-2006 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite
You're never as good as you look when you win ...

... or as bad as you look when you lose.

Nonetheless ... Flower Alley was ... and is ... vastly overrated.

It's the Pletcher goo-goo factor at work.

you got it. pletcher goo-goo factor at work. i just thought the lack of respect for a horse coming off two grade 1 wins easily was ridiculous. flower alley is a very good horse but i tire of these experts telling us you can win horse of the year off 4 starts. i loved GZ but even with him 4 starts was ridiculous. he did have a soundness issue as an excuse.

flower alley literally sat around and got fat doing nothing and we were all told to worship him.

Cajungator26 08-05-2006 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
you got it. pletcher goo-goo factor at work. i just thought the lack of respect for a horse coming off two grade 1 wins easily was ridiculous. flower alley is a very good horse but i tire of these experts telling us you can win horse of the year off 4 starts. i loved GZ but even with him 4 starts was ridiculous. he did have a soundness issue as an excuse.

flower alley literally sat around and got fat doing nothing and we were all told to worship him.

The horse deserved 3 months off. As long as he's not hurt, he'll come better his next one out. With that said, I've never been that impressed with him and I like Invasor a lot better.

Bold Brooklynite 08-05-2006 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
flower alley literally sat around and got fat doing nothing and we were all told to worship him.

Isn't it amazing to see ...

... how some trainers actually believe that their horses will improve by standing in a stall for nine months?

Pletcher has never trained a colt to be a consistent winner at classic distances on dirt ... despite hundreds and hundreds of opportunities ... and it's looking more and more like he never will.

Cajungator26 08-05-2006 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite
Isn't it amazing to see ...

... how some trainers actually believe that their horses will improve by standing in a stall for nine months?

Pletcher has never trained a colt to be a consistent winner at classic distances on dirt ... despite hundreds and hundreds of opportunities ... and it's looking more and more like he never will.

Oh please... the colt was off for 3 months NOT 9 months.

Exceller 08-05-2006 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
Oh please... the colt was off for 3 months NOT 9 months.

bb is right. no race for 9 months.

Cajungator26 08-05-2006 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
bb is right. no race for 9 months.

The colt was off of training for 3 months which means that he was NOT sitting in a stall for 9 months. Thank you...

Downthestretch55 08-05-2006 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bold Brooklynite
Isn't it amazing to see ...

... how some trainers actually believe that their horses will improve by standing in a stall for nine months?

Pletcher has never trained a colt to be a consistent winner at classic distances on dirt ... despite hundreds and hundreds of opportunities ... and it's looking more and more like he never will.

More words of "wisdom" from Bold Fraud.
Never puts out a winner.
Always picks the loser.
Criticizes the leading trainer at Saratoga.
And gets his "facts" wrong again.

What would you expect from a bum that lives in a cardboard box under the Cros Bronx Expressway and makes his "living" shining windshields on the exit ramp.
I really hope the library kicks him out so he won't be able to post his nonsense here anymore.

Total constipated BS.
When he lets go, the NYC sewers will be blocked up for months.

eurobounce 08-05-2006 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
The colt was off of training for 3 months which means that he was NOT sitting in a stall for 9 months. Thank you...

Cajun, I believe the horse was out of training from the BCC of 2005 to May of 2006. So that is about 5-6 months. But I am sure he was jogged and all that good stuff. But remember the main goal is the BCC. This is what is wrong with the Breeders Cup.

Thunder Gulch 08-05-2006 05:49 PM

Clearly not good today, but calling this horse a fraud is shortsighted. He's already run faster than almost every horse in the country, so toss this race and let's see what he does next time. The goal is to run his best race at Churchill this fall, and I'm not one to question the methods of the top trainer in America.

sumitas 08-05-2006 05:50 PM

i suppose the tip was when Mayne, on ESPN, said Pletcher said FA was not 100% coming into this race.

Exceller 08-05-2006 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eurobounce
Cajun, I believe the horse was out of training from the BCC of 2005 to May of 2006. So that is about 5-6 months. But I am sure he was jogged and all that good stuff. But remember the main goal is the BCC. This is what is wrong with the Breeders Cup.

he did not race for 8 months.

FA is a really good horse but what I meant by nothing special is that he is not a st liam/ghostzapper type. invasor probably is.

Gander 08-05-2006 07:47 PM

Hes no horse of the year canindate. Thats for sure. Lava Man and Bernardini are the only two possibilities. Flower Alley has no shot. That was a dismal performance and at 3/2 to boot.

Danzig 08-05-2006 08:07 PM

i said elsewhere that i was never high on the horse, but i think fraud is too strong a word. he's got a lot of redeeming to do right now if he wants to get back into the hoy picture....

obviously flower alley wasn't ready for today. whether he was short, out of shape, or lack of seasoning....or a bit of all. pletcher said he wasn't fit, that he expected him to peak in two more races. but wow, no way tap thought flower alley would finish out of the money.

Danzig 08-05-2006 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gander
Hes no horse of the year canindate. Thats for sure. Lava Man and Bernardini are the only two possibilities. Flower Alley has no shot. That was a dismal performance and at 3/2 to boot.

you don't think invasor has a shot at hoy? i'd say he has more of a shot at it right now than bernardini.

Gander 08-05-2006 08:11 PM

Trainers have said before there horse werent 100% coming into a race and they have looked extraordinary and won races, so I kind of get a little suspect of an excuse before the race even starts. Todd was right and I guess we as bettors should applaud him saying that. I didnt use him at all but still lost.

But how freaking long did he have to get ready for this race? Pletcher had this whole campaign mapped out before the year even started and cant get a horse in shape for a 750K race? If I were the owners I wouldnt be too happy with that.

Gander 08-05-2006 08:12 PM

Sorry I left out Invasor. Sure, if he went on to win the BC Classic, why not.
Basicall whoever wins the BC Classic out of Lava Man, Bernardini and Invasor.

Danzig 08-05-2006 08:16 PM

maybe the horse isn't the horse everyone thought he was....maybe he was done maturing last fall. and now everyone else has passed him. or maybe he just had an off day. wait and see what everyone has to say about him...wait and see what he does next. we've all seen horses fail to live up to their expectations. some of them come back and wow everyone again, others cause ulcers in the future!
he certainly had a lot of hype all year. at this point he looks undeserving of all the accolades. it's kind of funny he's gotten so much praise, he's only won one race (the salvator mile) since the travers a year ago. one win in a year. i think a lot of people got way ahead of themselves with this guy.

paisjpq 08-05-2006 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danzig188
maybe the horse isn't the horse everyone thought he was....maybe he was done maturing last fall. and now everyone else has passed him. or maybe he just had an off day. wait and see what everyone has to say about him...wait and see what he does next. we've all seen horses fail to live up to their expectations. some of them come back and wow everyone again, others cause ulcers in the future!
he certainly had a lot of hype all year. at this point he looks undeserving of all the accolades. it's kind of funny he's gotten so much praise, he's only won one race (the salvator mile) since the travers a year ago. one win in a year. i think a lot of people got way ahead of themselves with this guy.

Agreed. Completely.

Danzig 08-05-2006 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gander
Sorry I left out Invasor. Sure, if he went on to win the BC Classic, why not.
Basicall whoever wins the BC Classic out of Lava Man, Bernardini and Invasor.

bernardini has to get thru the travers first.


things are really starting to get exciting.

Bold Brooklynite 08-05-2006 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cajungator26
The colt was off of training for 3 months which means that he was NOT sitting in a stall for 9 months. Thank you...

Dearest Madam,

I was speaking metaphorically when I said he was standing ... not sitting ... in a stall for nine months. That was a figure of speech ... for the fact that the horse hadn't raced in nine months.

You know what a "figure of speech" is don't you? That's correct.

One, two, three, four ... when spoken ... are all figures of speech.

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeesh !!!

pgardn 08-05-2006 09:19 PM

I dont see how a horse that came in a very tough second as a 3 YEAR OLD at the BCC can be considered a fraud. How many races can Invasor run like that? That had to take the starch out. Heroic effort to hold off Sun King in a meltdown.

jpops757 08-05-2006 09:36 PM

If surf Cat can return and the conections will send him east he should be in line for some consideration for HOY. Nothing but brialance on the track.

alysheba4 08-05-2006 10:02 PM

i just hope he didnt get hurt, i have a bad feeling though because he is no fraud.......

Pointg5 08-05-2006 10:15 PM

He's no fraud and he had a "problem" in the JCGC, I wouldn't be surprised if that problem reared up again. It's funny how short of memories some of you have, but then again most of you are stupid...

eurobounce 08-05-2006 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
he did not race for 8 months.

FA is a really good horse but what I meant by nothing special is that he is not a st liam/ghostzapper type. invasor probably is.

I know he hasnt raced in 8 months. I was talking about training not racing.

eurobounce 08-05-2006 11:36 PM

This might be Todd Pletchers worse training performance of his career. If Flower Alley goes on to lose the JCGC and BCC then it is all on Pletcher. He had the route mapped out since last Dec.

1st_Saturday_in_May 08-05-2006 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
he did not race for 8 months.

FA is a really good horse but what I meant by nothing special is that he is not a st liam/ghostzapper type. invasor probably is.

He's probably as good as Saint Liam or atleast close. Neither of them (SL or Invasor) are like Ghostzapper. He was far superior when on his game...

eurobounce 08-05-2006 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1st_Saturday_in_May
He's probably as good as Saint Liam or atleast close. Neither of them (SL or Invasor) are like Ghostzapper. He was far superior when on his game...

See I dont get where St Liam was all that good.

1st_Saturday_in_May 08-05-2006 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eurobounce
See I dont get where St Liam was all that good.

St. Liam wasnt that great at all but the best of his season. I think Invasor is currently the best of his season but neither have knocked my socks off so to speak with talent so I rank them very similarly. Invasor could and maybe will prove to be better, but St. Liam did show up for the most part when asked so he has a BC win in his favor. For speculations sake (and nothing more), if Invasor goes on to win the BCC I think he and St. Liam will go down in history viewed about the same. Nice horses, not overly spectacular, more gritty than flashy. I just think Ghostzapper was in a league of his own.

eurobounce 08-05-2006 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1st_Saturday_in_May
St. Liam wasnt that great at all but the best of his season. I think Invasor is currently the best of his season but neither have knocked my socks off so to speak with talent so I rank them very similarly. Invasor could and maybe will prove to be better, but St. Liam did show up for the most part when asked so he has a BC win in his favor. For speculations sake (and nothing more), if Invasor goes on to win the BCC I think he and St. Liam will go down in history viewed about the same. Nice horses, not overly spectacular, more gritty than flashy. I just think Ghostzapper was in a league of his own.

I couldnt agree more. St Liam won by default last year in the BCC.

Dunbar 08-06-2006 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1st_Saturday_in_May
For speculations sake (and nothing more), if Invasor goes on to win the BCC I think he and St. Liam will go down in history viewed about the same. Nice horses, not overly spectacular, more gritty than flashy. I just think Ghostzapper was in a league of his own.

Ghostzapper didn't look like he was "in a league of his own" when St Liam had him fully extended to win the only race the ran against each other. St Liam ran with him around the turn and the entire stretch, only to lose by a fraction of a length. GZ WAS a special horse, I agree. But elevating GZ at St Liam's expense doesn't cut it.

It's still too early to rate Invasor. But I don't see how anyone can fault what Invasor has done so far. VERY nice horse.

--Dunbar

oracle80 08-06-2006 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exceller
i have been reading all of the nonsene posted on this board about this horse by the so called experts adn how great he is. that horse is nothing special. a fraud if you ask me. Invasor and Bernardini are much better than anything else. poor Sun King. I hope he gets up one day because he deserves it.

How in the world canyou bash a horse who has won a grade one when the stable you belong to has been taking investor's money for years and never even won ONE grade one. Flower Alley has won more Grade One stakes than your stable has in its existence. Isn't that hysterical? LOL!!!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.