![]() |
Voters being illegally removed from rolls
|
Quote:
|
You clearly didn't read a word of the article, and if you did, you grossly misinterpreted it.
Since I doubt your ignorant ass would bother to try to understand it the second time around.. There's a federal law requiring that state identification databases be used first to confirm voter eligibility and Social Security be used only as a last resort, since the database is fraught with errors. Certain states are not using state identification first and are wrongly flagging registrations as invalid because of Social Security database errors. Many of these new voters are being illegally taken off the rolls, without notice. You don't see anything wrong with that? |
Not directly related to this, but I saw the great :rolleyes: James Carville on CNN the other night, immediately after the debate. He brought up the prospect of what might happen if Obama goes into election day with a widely reported 6,8 or 10 point lead in the polls, then loses to McCain. He didn't elaborate, but suggested that there would be real ugliness to follow. I don't think he meant just the black communities would revolt. Liberal, and now all Dems , were pushed to the edge with the GW Bush election result.
If Obama loses, I won't believe it |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
crescent rolls?
|
Quote:
Seriously, get this inane partisan bullshit out of my thread. I'm trying to bring up a major issue. |
Oh come on..they polls have been cheating for years now.
This is nothing new....just more of the same. |
|
Quote:
So what would that make a blog that cites the New York Post? Way to go Timmi! We will show them. Foxnews polls are Rigged for the liberals!!!! |
Quote:
CNN has links(vids) about the Obama/Ayers link..for the past 20 years! I don't hear you mentioning that....just that everyone who disagrees with you is a moron.....bring back Oracle,then! |
Quote:
You may think I'm partisan, but either way, this wasn't supposed to be a partisan thread. I should've known, however, that Jwhateverska or you or one of the other ignorant nutjobs would come in here and bring up some right-wing talking point. |
the most important right we have is the right to vote. i don't understand why anyone would think it wasn't that big a deal, or wasn't a problem if some are taken off the rolls, etc. it's a serious issue. again, not sure why it's a party issue to some, it's a basic rights issue, and affects all voters, not just dems, not just reps, not just independant voters. after all, how would you feel if you went to vote and were denied that ability--when you had registered and knew full well you should be able to cast your ballot?
|
Quote:
how is that worse than having a registered voter be denied his right to vote? you're comparing two completely different things. your post serves nothing, as i'd imagine that an equally damning article on an investigation could be found on mccain. dogs chasing their tails, while fundamental rights are taken away from american citizens. |
Quote:
![]() |
Quote:
I did have to laugh at Morty's post though. |
:)
|
morty rules........
|
Quote:
correct me if you think I'm wrong but being illegally registred 10-15 times or dead people voting is a little worse than people who haven't voted, or moved, being stricken from the voting roster. It wasn't meant as a party thing, but since the Dems are driving people to the Mosques to register, I'll leave you to your own conclusion! http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ents-to-acorn/ you can't tell me that you approve of these thing. |
did you read the article? it has to do with certain states not following the law about removing voters from rolls. didn't mention the # of voters, how they compare to the population as a whole. has a lot to do with people having moved, and not having all their paperwork completely up to date for one--so, the state sees something doesn't tally with the ss paperwork, and off you go. probably has a lot to do with people updating their SS stuff(so as not to affect getting their federal tax return for example, as we all know you must give a proper physical address) while remaining in their home state, and their drivers license shows their old addy. after all, who updates their DL when they move in state? probably not many folks, i'd imagine they wait til the thing expires to avoid an extra fee.
the article doesn't discuss possible improper registration, but illegal removal of voters. BIG difference. |
Quote:
it's pretty elitist to think a dead person can't vote but a junior high drop out can. and i hate the idea that american muslims might participate in mainstream politics. we're much better off keeping them marginalized. i wonder if some smart republican will ever figure out that a culture built around the family might be their natural constituency if you stopped dumbfu<k yahoo's from driving them the other direction. |
Quote:
i don't know what to say. what, folks who worship in mosques have lost their right to register? i didn't know that. but you know...had the founding fathers realized just how much trouble we'd have from muslim americans, no doubt there'd be something in the constitution about everyone but them having religious freedom. no doubt about it. :rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...4%7D&dist=hppr |
Quote:
Make it quick...no google. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/...ims/index.html And its from CNN Who cares what I know about ACORN, the facts are out there now. Go ahead and explain away DALA. |
Quote:
http://www.rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html |
Quote:
Im not getting into this one. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think everyone should be able to vote, but if you do not have some form of government ID you should NOT be allowed to vote. It really isn't that hard to come up with a drivers license or a picture ID. I think this is the most ridiculous thing going. All you have to do is walk up and say you are somebody and vote. Unreal.
|
we show a license here when we vote, i thought everyone did.
|
Quote:
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/ma...photo_id_vote/ They actually took this to court and the court said it is ok for a state to make a law stating ID is required, but states still don't have to do it. MSNBC: The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states can require voters to produce photo identification without violating their constitutional rights, validating Republican-inspired voter ID laws. In a splintered 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Indiana's strict photo ID requirement, which Democrats and civil rights groups said would deter poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots. Its backers said it was needed to prevent fraud. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.