Derby Trail Forums

Derby Trail Forums (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Paddock (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   curlin is going down (http://www.derbytrail.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25277)

hoovesupsideyourhead 09-26-2008 06:56 PM

curlin is going down
 
hes gonna lose sat........

blackthroatedwind 09-26-2008 06:59 PM

Why's that Matt?

pointman 09-26-2008 07:49 PM

Hooves, I respect your opinion, but really, who is going to beat him here unless he beats himself?

hrfan 09-26-2008 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pointman
Hooves, I respect your opinion, but really, who is going to beat him here unless he beats himself?

mambo is pretty logical... on paper there is a ton of speed, should get a perfect setup/run

Bobby Fischer 09-26-2008 10:01 PM

unless Larry Jones' horse some how has a freakish run, an equal effort of the Woodward should be enough to beat this group.

CSC 09-26-2008 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
hes gonna lose sat........

3 races ago, I think that would be considered absurb.

From his last 2 races, I don't think many would consider it to be a major surprise if it did happen.

hoovesupsideyourhead 09-26-2008 10:21 PM

1 hes looked weaker and weaker as he faced foes,,
2 the slop/mud will be taxing on him
3 mombo and some others are at the peak of their form
4 the pace should make him commit to a presser role.
5 wandring boy sets him up / merchant marine /mambo/ timber resurve take m down.............imo.........

blackthroatedwind 09-26-2008 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
1 hes looked weaker and weaker as he faced foes,,
2 the slop/mud will be taxing on him
3 mombo and some others are at the peak of their form
4 the pace should make him commit to a presser role.
5 wandring boy sets him up / merchant marine /mambo/ timber resurve take m down.............imo.........


1. His last wasn't spectacular but it still beats this field unless Wanderin Boy gets totally loose ( possible ) and speed is absolutely deadly.

2. Makes no sense....the best race he ever ran was in the slop and it's far from clear it will be sloppy or muddy.

3. Mambo has to improve dramatically to beat Curlin unless Curlin doesn't show up.

4. I guess it's possible but he will be ridden confidently, as he should be, and only a slop induced speed bias will beat him....not his riding tactics per se.

5. I don't get what you're trying to say.

I don't have the ultimate confidence in Curlin, though he's a fairly likely winner, but he's still 40% to lose ( he's around 1:2 here ) so saying he will lose is hardly going out on a limb. The question is how will you make money on the race with an anti-Curlin opinion and in my opinion there are better places, and ways, to try to make money both tomorrow and any day.

hoovesupsideyourhead 09-26-2008 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
1. His last wasn't spectacular but it still beats this field unless Wanderin Boy gets totally loose ( possible ) and speed is absolutely deadly.

2. Makes no sense....the best race he ever ran was in the slop and it's far from clear it will be sloppy or muddy.

3. Mambo has to improve dramatically to beat Curlin unless Curlin doesn't show up.

4. I guess it's possible but he will be ridden confidently, as he should be, and only a slop induced speed bias will beat him....not his riding tactics per se.

5. I don't get what you're trying to say.

I don't have the ultimate confidence in Curlin, though he's a fairly likely winner, but he's still 40% to lose ( he's around 1:2 here ) so saying he will lose is hardly going out on a limb. The question is how will you make money on the race with an anti-Curlin opinion and in my opinion there are better places, and ways, to try to make money both tomorrow and any day.

in the pick 4 and 3 ..i just think it may be muddy not sloppy and that may be his undoing....imo

stonegossard 09-26-2008 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
1 hes looked weaker and weaker as he faced foes,,
2 the slop/mud will be taxing on him
3 mombo and some others are at the peak of their form
4 the pace should make him commit to a presser role.
5 wandring boy sets him up / merchant marine /mambo/ timber resurve take m down.............imo.........


Congrats Hooves.


You have won the Most Moronic Post of the Year for 2008.


You have won a year subscription to your handicapping site.


Good luck with that.



#2 is hysterical. Miss The BC last year did ya?

#4 was a close 2nd to #4 in level of stupidity.


Luckily I had the 2-4 exacta...even though it only paid $4.60.

RollerDoc 09-26-2008 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
1. His last wasn't spectacular but it still beats this field unless Wanderin Boy gets totally loose ( possible ) and speed is absolutely deadly.

2. Makes no sense....the best race he ever ran was in the slop and it's far from clear it will be sloppy or muddy.

3. Mambo has to improve dramatically to beat Curlin unless Curlin doesn't show up.

4. I guess it's possible but he will be ridden confidently, as he should be, and only a slop induced speed bias will beat him....not his riding tactics per se.

5. I don't get what you're trying to say.

I don't have the ultimate confidence in Curlin, though he's a fairly likely winner, but he's still 40% to lose ( he's around 1:2 here ) so saying he will lose is hardly going out on a limb. The question is how will you make money on the race with an anti-Curlin opinion and in my opinion there are better places, and ways, to try to make money both tomorrow and any day.

If the bettor believes Curlin is going down, and Curlin does go down, and the bettor bet against Curlin, how is this not a good opportunity to make some money?

pick4 09-26-2008 10:57 PM

1. His last wasn't spectacular but it still beats this field unless Wanderin Boy gets totally loose ( possible ) and speed is absolutely deadly.

This scenerio is the most likely one that has Curlin losing.

While Mambo In Seattle is an improving horse I still think he has to make another huge step up to beat this field. I had a lot of wagers tied to this horse and his loss in the Travers was the most painful beat I've suffered as a horseplayer.

I thought Wanderin Boy would be the pacesetter in the Woodward but Pass The Point ran a career best race. I think Wanderin Boy will get the lead here.How much he has to work get and maintain that lead will make the difference. The only horse that I can see upsetting the scenerio I foresee is Merchant Marine. He has the early lick to make Wanderin Boy work hard early.

hoovesupsideyourhead 09-26-2008 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stonegossard
Congrats Hooves.


You have won the Most Moronic Post of the Year for 2008.


You have won a year subscription to your handicapping site.


Good luck with that.



#2 is hysterical. Miss The BC last year did ya?

#4 was a close 2nd to #4 in level of stupidity.


Luckily I had the 2-4 exacta...even though it only paid $4.60.

ok i get the flack i just dont think hes ready to go vs some of these..and did you load up on the brass hat party the last few times...:zz:

dalakhani 09-26-2008 10:59 PM

Timber Reserve.

I agree with Hooves. I think Curlin is going down.

stonegossard 09-26-2008 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
ok i get the flack i just dont think hes ready to go vs some of these..and did you load up on the brass hat party the last few times...:zz:

Nah...I bet him in The Donn this year. Thats it. Threw in the towel after that. His connections have completely mismanaged him since. Hasnt he done enough ?

I cant fault you for trying to beat a favorite. But he isnt the one I would go after. Plus he moves up HUGE in the slop.

hrfan 09-26-2008 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
1 hes looked weaker and weaker as he faced foes,,
2 the slop/mud will be taxing on him
3 mombo and some others are at the peak of their form
4 the pace should make him commit to a presser role.
5 wandring boy sets him up / merchant marine /mambo/ timber resurve take m down.............imo.........

i have been saying the 5 things that you said

stonegossard 09-26-2008 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hrfan
i have been saying the 5 things that you said

Sorry.....only one award can be given out a day.


Please repost this in 23 hrs and 21 minutes.

letswastemoney 09-27-2008 12:15 AM

Yup...he's going down to the winner's circle :)

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2008 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RollerDoc
If the bettor believes Curlin is going down, and Curlin does go down, and the bettor bet against Curlin, how is this not a good opportunity to make some money?


Oh, it is a theoretical opportunity, but you still have to construct a winning play. The question is what exactly is that winning play.

magic_idol 09-27-2008 05:53 AM

All Great Horses have their knockers & when they finally loose they stand up & say I told you so !!!!:(.
Even after all the great wins that make a great horse

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2008 05:55 AM

Curlin is not a " great " horse. He's a very good horse.

Holland Hacker 09-27-2008 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Curlin is not a " great " horse. He's a very good horse.

BTW I'm curious who in your mind is a "great" horse? I know you and several others "blasted" me for saying Ginger Punch was great so I'm wondering what in your mind makes a "great" horse.

By the way did you lose the picture of GP or did you manage to hold onto it for the day?

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2008 06:51 AM

I actually have it....shockingly I didn't lose it.

Repeated superiority while running many fast races. I think greatness is very rare.

Look at it this way, while it is not his fault, what if Bernardini and Invasor had stayed around all last year, and Street Sense, Hard Spun, and Any Given Saturday had stayed around this year. Do you think Curlin would have had an unblemished record? Now, this is no knock on him, more an attempt to put things in perspective. Horses these days don't get the opportunities to prove their potential " greatness " but running mildly fast ( for top horses ) races while beating Barcolo and Past the Point doesn't make a horse great.

Do you think Roses in May was a great horse? Do you honestly think Curlin has shown on the racetrack that he is vastly superior to him? How do you think Ginger Punch would have done against Go for Wand? How about Inside Information or even Heavenly Prize? Forget them....she wouldn't have beaten their much less heralded stablemate Dispute. She may be " great " relative to her current competition but greatness has to be measured against history. Against history these horses are relative also rans.

Curlin would have traded decisions with Albert the Great. He would have gotten dusted by Street Cry. Lido Palace would have given him a rough time ( in his 4YO year ). This is no criticism, as these were exceptionally talented horses, but do you think of them as great? Being better than your competition does not make you great.

Bigsmc 09-27-2008 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hrfan
i have been saying the 5 things that you said

Now that's a ringing endorsement of Hooves' 'capping.

:zz:

magic_idol 09-27-2008 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I actually have it....shockingly I didn't lose it.

Repeated superiority while running many fast races. I think greatness is very rare.


He would have gotten dusted by Street Cry. Lido Palace would have given him a rough time ( in his 4YO year ). This is no criticism, as these were exceptionally talented horses, but do you think of them as great? Being better than your competition does not make you great.

Man i need the drugs your on !!!!!:rolleyes: ,
You actually believe that :confused: ,,All horses have a curve but the question is when all these horses are at the top of their curve who are Great & who are Talented no disrespect but wow if i was a bookie i would take your money & just smile when you handed it over at the race meet street cry vrses Curlin & think cool my family all gets steak tonight ;)

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2008 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by magic_idol
Man i need the drugs your on !!!!!:rolleyes: ,
You actually believe that :confused: ,,All horses have a curve but the question is when all these horses are at the top of their curve who are Great & who are Talented no disrespect but wow if i was a bookie i would take your money & just smile when you handed it over at the race meet street cry vrses Curlin & think cool my family all gets steak tonight ;)


The emoticons don't hide the complete inaccuracy of your post. In fact, they accentuate it.

magic_idol 09-27-2008 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
The emoticons don't hide the complete inaccuracy of your post. In fact, they accentuate it.

In that case all i can do is reply with a emoticon ....


.

blackthroatedwind 09-27-2008 07:22 AM

The interesting thing about your post is the blatant contradiction. If you think the best races of a horse define them then you really need to carefully review Street Cry's Stephen Foster. Quite simply, it is two or three lengths better than any race Curlin ever ran.

hoovesupsideyourhead 09-27-2008 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigsmc
Now that's a ringing endorsement of Hooves' 'capping.

:zz:

yesh i should have zipped my pie hole...though it would get some conversation going..

philcski 09-27-2008 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
yesh i should have zipped my pie hole...though it would get some conversation going..

:D nothing wrong with that. I wanna beat Curlin today too, but there isn't a horse in here that can.

Street Cry vs Curlin? Please. Street Cry, easily.

Thunder Gulch 09-27-2008 08:15 AM

Anyone that says an off track will compromise Curlin today is really reaching.

Bobby Fischer 09-27-2008 09:38 AM

Head To Head??
 
Mambo In Seattle or Stones River?

I'll take Stones River


Angliana or Merchant Marine?

I'll take Angliana


Better Scratch??
Timber Reserve or Frost Giant ? :zz:

dalakhani 09-27-2008 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I actually have it....shockingly I didn't lose it.

Repeated superiority while running many fast races. I think greatness is very rare.

Look at it this way, while it is not his fault, what if Bernardini and Invasor had stayed around all last year, and Street Sense, Hard Spun, and Any Given Saturday had stayed around this year. Do you think Curlin would have had an unblemished record? Now, this is no knock on him, more an attempt to put things in perspective. Horses these days don't get the opportunities to prove their potential " greatness " but running mildly fast ( for top horses ) races while beating Barcolo and Past the Point doesn't make a horse great.

Do you think Roses in May was a great horse? Do you honestly think Curlin has shown on the racetrack that he is vastly superior to him? How do you think Ginger Punch would have done against Go for Wand? How about Inside Information or even Heavenly Prize? Forget them....she wouldn't have beaten their much less heralded stablemate Dispute. She may be " great " relative to her current competition but greatness has to be measured against history. Against history these horses are relative also rans.

Curlin would have traded decisions with Albert the Great. He would have gotten dusted by Street Cry. Lido Palace would have given him a rough time ( in his 4YO year ). This is no criticism, as these were exceptionally talented horses, but do you think of them as great? Being better than your competition does not make you great.

Ive read lots of posts on different boards on the subject of "greatness" and this is one of the best. Thank you.

To add a little bit, MDO would have no doubt beaten Curlin consistently at 9f. The Emoticon poster talks about grading horses at their best, but would Curlin's best beat Aptititude's JCGC? Candy Ride's Pac Classic? St Liam's woodward?

Curlin is a very nice horse and certainly accomplished. In the context of history, he doesnt even rate. In the context of the last ten years? He is not even top five.

Coach Pants 09-27-2008 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philcski
:D nothing wrong with that. I wanna beat Curlin today too, but there isn't a horse in here that can.

Wanderin Boy can have a career best if he gets an uncontested lead; and without an improvement from Curlin's form since Dubai....

pgardn 09-27-2008 10:12 AM

I thought all hooves stated in the first post was
Curlin is going down. So its not legal to make
a prediction without an accompanying plan to make
money on it...

Noted.

CSC 09-27-2008 10:37 AM

This may sound crazy, but I think Merchant Marine can surprise today. He can certainly hit the board and if for whatever reason Curlin isn't at his best. He may even upset the applecart. He's totally off everyone's radar.

Coach Pants 09-27-2008 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CSC
This may sound crazy, but I think Merchant Marine can surprise today. He can certainly hit the board and if for whatever reason Curlin isn't at his best. He may even upset the applecart. He's totally off everyone's radar.

He's definitely got a shot if Curlin doesn't fire.

CSC 09-27-2008 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach Pants
He's definitely got a shot if Curlin doesn't fire.

Usually thing for me is trying to stay away from the wiseguy horses, I do like his pattern of a 7 1/2 f sprint win to a 1 mile work, if he can put up a career best number it will be certainly worth the bang for the buck investment.

Too bad Timber Reserve had to scratch...

RollerDoc 09-27-2008 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
I actually have it....shockingly I didn't lose it.

Repeated superiority while running many fast races. I think greatness is very rare.

Look at it this way, while it is not his fault, what if Bernardini and Invasor had stayed around all last year, and Street Sense, Hard Spun, and Any Given Saturday had stayed around this year. Do you think Curlin would have had an unblemished record? Now, this is no knock on him, more an attempt to put things in perspective. Horses these days don't get the opportunities to prove their potential " greatness " but running mildly fast ( for top horses ) races while beating Barcolo and Past the Point doesn't make a horse great.

Do you think Roses in May was a great horse? Do you honestly think Curlin has shown on the racetrack that he is vastly superior to him? How do you think Ginger Punch would have done against Go for Wand? How about Inside Information or even Heavenly Prize? Forget them....she wouldn't have beaten their much less heralded stablemate Dispute. She may be " great " relative to her current competition but greatness has to be measured against history. Against history these horses are relative also rans.

Curlin would have traded decisions with Albert the Great. He would have gotten dusted by Street Cry. Lido Palace would have given him a rough time ( in his 4YO year ). This is no criticism, as these were exceptionally talented horses, but do you think of them as great? Being better than your competition does not make you great.

Why is Big Brown's name missing from this post? :)

RollerDoc 09-27-2008 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Oh, it is a theoretical opportunity, but you still have to construct a winning play. The question is what exactly is that winning play.

In my opinion is to throw out the top two seeded horses and pick two others that you think could (not will) legitimately win and play them across the board. Other than Mambo and Curlin, I see some very nice odds.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.